x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Oncology
- Andriole, Gerald LRemove Andriole, Gerald L filter
- 2018 - 2023Remove 2018 - 2023 filter
Author
- Kim, Eric H5
- Shetty, Anup S5
- Vetter, Joel M5
- Ippolito, Joseph E3
- Fowler, Kathryn J2
- Abern, Michael R1
- Arett, Christopher T1
- Bhat, Nisha R1
- Drake, Bettina F1
- Freedland, Stephen J1
- Henning, Grant M1
- Meng, Yifan1
- Mima, Mahmoud1
- Monda, Steven M1
- Moreira, Daniel M1
- Ohlander, Samuel J1
- Pagani, Rodrigo L1
- Parker, Alexander A1
- Pickersgill, Nicholas A1
- Raval, Neel S1
- Schwarzman, Logan S1
- Weese, Jonathan R1
Oncology
6 Results
- Oncology
Diagnostic Properties of Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen to Predict Overall and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Among Men With Low Testosterone and Prior Negative Biopsy
UrologyVol. 137p97–101Published online: November 13, 2019- Logan S. Schwarzman
- Rodrigo L. Pagani
- Samuel J. Ohlander
- Mahmoud Mima
- Michael R. Abern
- Gerald L. Andriole
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 4To evaluate whether total serum PSA, free-PSA ratio and PSA density have similar diagnostic properties for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically-significant (cs) PCa in men with normal testosterone compared to men with low testosterone with a prior negative biopsy. - Oncology
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in African-American Men
UrologyVol. 134p181–185Published online: August 13, 2019- Grant M. Henning
- Joel M. Vetter
- Bettina F. Drake
- Joseph E. Ippolito
- Anup S. Shetty
- Gerald L. Andriole
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 5To compare test performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in African-American men (AAM) and white men (WM) using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in unmatched groups as well as a cohort matched for clinical factors. - Oncology
The Accuracy of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation: Impact of the Individual Radiologist and Clinical Factors
UrologyVol. 127p68–73Published online: February 23, 2019- Nicholas A. Pickersgill
- Joel M. Vetter
- Neel S. Raval
- Gerald L. Andriole
- Anup S. Shetty
- Joseph E. Ippolito
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 14To compare test performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of prostate cancer between individual radiologists using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and to identify clinical factors that may predict test performance. - Oncology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Significantly Improves the Risk Prediction for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Biopsy
UrologyVol. 126p152–157Published online: December 20, 2018- Nisha R. Bhat
- Joel M. Vetter
- Gerald L. Andriole
- Anup S. Shetty
- Joseph E. Ippolito
- Eric H. Kim
Cited in Scopus: 23To evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and MRI interpretation for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). - Oncology
Improved Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Software-assisted Systematic Biopsy Using MR/US Fusion in Patients With Negative Prostate MRI
UrologyVol. 120p162–166Published online: June 26, 2018- Yifan Meng
- Joel M. Vetter
- Alexander A. Parker
- Christopher T. Arett
- Gerald L. Andriole
- Anup S. Shetty
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 3To compare detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 7 or above) between standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (TRUSGB) and software-assisted systematic biopsy (SASB) using magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion in the setting of negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in biopsy-naïve patients. - Oncology
Cognitive Versus Software Fusion for MRI-targeted Biopsy: Experience Before and After Implementation of Fusion
UrologyVol. 119p115–120Published online: June 22, 2018- Steven M. Monda
- Joel M. Vetter
- Gerald L. Andriole
- Kathryn J. Fowler
- Anup S. Shetty
- Jonathan R. Weese
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 25To compare the diagnostic performance of the 2 most common approaches of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (TB)—cognitive registration targeted biopsy (COG-TB) and software fusion targeted biopsy (FUS-TB)—we assessed our institutional experience with both methods. TB has emerged to complement systematic template biopsy (SB) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis; however, which magnetic resonance imaging targeting methodology is diagnostically better remains unclear.