Advertisement
UROLOGY
Advanced searchSave search
Adult Urology| Volume 54, ISSUE 2, P346-351, August 1999

Download started.

Ok

Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00099-0
Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function
Previous ArticleDiscussion
Next ArticleReview of cleveland clinic experience with penile fracture

      Abstract

      Objectives. To evaluate the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) as a diagnostic tool to discriminate between men with and without erectile dysfunction (ED) and to develop a clinically meaningful gradient of severity for ED.
      Methods. One thousand one hundred fifty-one men (1035 with and 116 without ED) who reported attempting sexual activity were evaluated using data from four clinical trials of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) and two control samples. The statistical program Classification and Regression Trees was used to determine optimal cutoff scores on the EF domain (range 6 to 30) to distinguish between men with and without ED and to determine levels of ED severity on the EF domain using the IIEF item on sexual intercourse satisfaction.
      Results. For a 0.5 prevalence rate of ED, the optimal cutoff score was 25, with men scoring less than or equal to 25 classified as having ED and those scoring above 25 as not having ED (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 0.88). Sensitivity analyses revealed a robust statistical solution that was well supported with different assumed prevalence rates and several cross-validations. The severity of ED was classified into five categories: no ED (EF score 26 to 30), mild (EF score 22 to 25), mild to moderate (EF score 17 to 21), moderate (EF score 11 to 16), and severe (EF score 6 to 10). Substantial agreement was shown between these predicted and “true” classes (weighted kappa 0.80).
      Conclusions. The EF domain possesses favorable statistical properties as a diagnostic tool, not only in distinguishing between men with and without ED, but also in classifying levels of ED severity. Clinical validation with self-rated assessments of ED severity is warranted.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosen R.C
        • Riley A
        • Wagner G
        • et al.
        The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction.
        Urology. 1997; 49: 822-830
        View in Article

      2. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, et al: for the Sildenafil Study Group: Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 338: 1397–1404, 1998.

        View in Article

      3. Goldstein I, and the Vasomax Study Group: Efficacy and safety of oral phentolamine (Vasomax) for the treatment of minimal erectile dysfunction. J Urol 159(suppl): 240, 1998.

        View in Article
        • Feldman H.A
        • Goldstein I
        • Hatzichristou D.G
        • et al.
        Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts male aging study.
        J Urol. 1994; 151: 54-61
        View in Article
        • Feldman H.A
        • Goldstein I
        • Hatzichristou D.G
        • et al.
        Construction of a surrogate variable for impotence in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 457-467
        View in Article
        • O’Leary M.P
        • Fowler F.J
        • Lenderking W.R
        • et al.
        A brief male sexual function inventory for urology.
        Urology. 1995; 46: 697-706
        View in Article
        • NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence
        Impotence.
        JAMA. 1993; 270: 83-90
        View in Article
        • Cappelleri J.C
        • Rosen R.C
        • Smith M.D
        • et al.
        Some developments on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).
        Drug Inf J. 1999; 33: 179-190
        View in Article
        • Steinberg D
        • Colla P
        CART. Salford Systems, San Diego1995
        View in Article

      10. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, et al: Classification and Regression Trees. Pacific Grove, Wadsworth, 1984.

        View in Article
        • Benet A.E
        • Melman A
        The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction.
        Urol Clin North Am. 1995; 22: 699-709
        View in Article

      12. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, version 6, 4th ed. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute, 1990, vol 2, p 944.

        View in Article

      13. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, et al: Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1980, pp 75–130.

        View in Article

      14. Dawson-Saunders B, and Trapp RG: Basic & Clinical Biostatistics, 2nd ed. Norwalk, Connecticut, Appleton & Lange, 1994, pp 232–248.

        View in Article
        • Cohen J
        A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20: 37-46
        View in Article
        • Cohen J
        Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.
        Psychol Bull. 1968; 70: 213-220
        View in Article

      17. StatXact 3 for Windows: Statistical Software for Exact Nonparametric Inference User Manual. Cambridge, CYTEL Software Corporation, 1995, pp 399–401, 639–663, 675–680.

        View in Article

      18. Siegel S, and Castellan NJ: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1988, pp 235–254.

        View in Article
        • Lamm S
        • Couzens G.S
        The Virility Factor. Simon & Schuster, New York1998: 98
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Accepted: February 5, 1999
      Received in revised form: February 5, 1999
      Received: December 4, 1998

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00099-0

      Copyright

      © 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX