The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Objectives. To develop a brief, reliable, self-administered measure of erectile function that is cross-culturally valid and psychometrically sound, with the sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment-related changes in patients with erectile dysfunction.
      Methods. Relevant domains of sexual function across various cultures were identified via a literature search of existing questionnaires and interviews of male patients with erectile dysfunction and of their partners. An initial questionnaire was administered to patients with erectile dysfunction, with results reviewed by an international panel of experts. Following linguistic validation in 10 languages, the final 15-item questionnaire, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), was examined for sensitivity, specificity, reliability (internal consistency and test-retest repeatability), and construct (concurrent, convergent, and discriminant) validity.
      Results. A principal components analysis identified five factors (that is, erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction) with eigenvalues greater than 1.0. A high degree of internal consistency was observed for each of the five domains and for the total scale (Cronbach's alpha values of 0.73 and higher and 0.91 and higher, respectively) in the populations studied. Test-retest repeatability correlation coefficients for the five domain scores were highly significant. The IIEF demonstrated adequate construct validity, and all five domains showed a high degree of sensitivity and specificity to the effects of treatment. Significant (P values = 0.0001) changes between baseline and post-treatment scores were observed across all five domains in the treatment responder cohort, but not in the treatment nonresponder cohort.
      Conclusions. The IIEF addresses the relevant domains of male sexual function (that is, erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction), is psychometrically sound, and has been linguistically validated in 10 languages. This questionnaire is readily self-administered in research or clinical settings. The IIEF demonstrates the sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment-related changes in patients with erectile dysfunction.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence: Impotence
        JAMA. 1993; 270: 83-90
        • Feldman HA
        • Goldstein I
        • Hatzichristou DG
        • Krane RJ
        • McKinlay JB
        Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study.
        J Urol. 1994; 151: 54-61
        • Saenz de Tejada I
        • Goldstein I
        • Azadzoi K
        • Krane RJ
        • Cohen RA
        Impaired neurogenic and endothelium-mediated relaxation of penile smooth muscle from diabetic men with impotence.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 1025
        • Shabsigh R
        • Fishman IJ
        • Schum C
        • Dunn JK
        Cigarette smoking and other risk factors in vasculogenic impotence.
        Urology. 1991; 38: 227
        • Conte HR
        Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: a review and critique.
        Arch Sex Behav. 1983; 12: 555-576
        • Anderson BL
        • Broffit B
        Is there a reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual function?.
        Arch Sex Behav. 1988; 17: 509-525
        • Stewart AL
        • Ware JE
        Measuring Functioning and Well-Being. Duke University Press, 1992
        • Derogatis LR
        • Melisaratos N
        The DSFI: a multi-dimensional measure of sexual functional.
        J Sex Marital Ther. 1979; 5: 244-281
        • Libman E
        • Rothenberg I
        • Fichten CS
        • Amsel R
        The SSES-E: a measure of sexual self-efficacy in erectile functioning.
        J Sex Marital Ther. 1985; 11: 233-244
        • Reynolds III, CF
        • Frank E
        • Thase ME
        • Houck PR
        • Jennings JR
        • Howell JR
        • Lilienfeld SO
        • Kupfer DJ
        Assessment of sexual function in depressed, impotent, and healthy men: factor analysis of a Brief Sexual Function Questionnaire for men.
        Psychiatry Res. 1988; 24: 231-250
        • O'Leary MP
        • Fowler FJ
        • Lenderking WR
        • Sagnier PP
        • Guess HA
        • Barry MJ
        A brief male sexual function inventory for urology.
        Urology. 1993; 46: 697-706
        • Cronbach IJ
        Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
        Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297
        • Rosen R
        • Riley A
        • Wagner G
        • Osterloh I
        • Kirkpatrick J
        • Mishra A
        The Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IED): a multi-dimensional scale for assessment of male erectile dysfunction (abstract).
        J Urol. 1996; 155: 466A
        • Gorsuch RL
        Factor Analysis. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1974
        • Boolell M
        • Gepi-Attee S
        • Gingell JC
        • Allen MJ
        Sildenafil, a novel effective oral therapy for male erectile dysfunction.
        Br J Urol. 1996; 78: 257-261
        • Boolell M
        • Allen MJ
        • Ballard SA
        • Muirhead GJ
        • Naylor AM
        • Osterloh IH
        • Gingell C
        Sildenafil: an orally active type 5 cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction.
        Int J Impotence Res. 1996; 8: 47-52
        • Kimmel D
        • Van der Veen F
        Factors of marital adjustment in Locke's marital adjustment test.
        J Marriage Fam. 1974; 29: 57-63
        • Crowne DP
        • Marlowe D
        A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1960; 24: 349-354
        • Kleinbaum DG
        • Kupper LL
        • Morgenstern H
        Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. Lifetime Learning Publications, New York1982: 152
        • Juniper EF
        • Guyatt GH
        Comparison of methods for selecting items for a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire: importance versus factor analysis.
        Qual Life Res. 1994; 3: 51-52
        • Hays RD
        • Hadorn D
        Responsiveness to change as an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension.
        Qual Life Res. 1992; 1: 73-75
        • Williams JI
        • Naylor DC
        How should health status measures be assessed? Cautionary notes on procrustean frameworks.
        Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 1347-1351
        • Ware Jr, JD
        Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.
        J Chron Dis. 1987; 40: 473-480
        • Rosen RC
        • Leiblum SR
        • Spector I
        Psychologically based treatment for male erectile disorder: a cognitive-interpersonal model.
        J Sex Marital Ther. 1994; 20: 67-85