Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

How Female Is the Future of Urology? Projecting Various Trajectories of the United States Urology Workforce

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To project the number and proportion of women in the urology workforce using recent demographic trends and develop an app to explore updated projections using future data.

      Methods

      Demographic data were obtained from AUA Censuses and ACGME Data Resource Books. The proportion of female graduating urology residents was characterized with a logistic growth model. ‘Stock and Flow’ models were used to project future population numbers and proportions of female practicing urologists, accounting for trainee demographics, retirement trends, and growth in the field.

      Results

      Assuming growth in urology graduate numbers and continued logistic growth in the proportion of women, 10,957 practicing urologists (38%) will be female by 2062. If the rate of women entering urology residency stagnates, 7,038 urologists (24%) will be female. If the retirement rates for women in urology change to mirror those of men and the proportion of female residents continues to experience logistic growth, 11,178 urologists (38%) will be female. An interactive app was designed to allow for a range of assumptions and future data: https://stephenrho.shinyapps.io/uro-workforce/.

      Conclusions

      Workforce projections should incorporate recent growth in numbers of female residents. If current growth continues, 38% of urologists will be female by 2062. The app allows for exploration of different scenarios and can be updated with new data. The projections demonstrate the need for targeted efforts to recruit women into urology, address disparities within the field, and work towards retaining female urologists. We must continue working towards an equitable future workforce that can address the impending shortage of urologists.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        AAMC Statement on Gender Equity. 2020;
        • Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education
        Data Resource Book Academic Year. 2021; : 2020-2021
        • Findlay B.L.
        • Bearrick E.N.
        • Granberg C.F.
        • Koo K.
        Path to Parity: Trends in Female Representation Among Physicians, Trainees, and Applicants in Urology and Surgical Specialties.
        Urology. 2023; 172: 228-233https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.033
        • Woolley A.W.
        • Chabris C.F.
        • Pentland A.
        • Hashmi N.
        • Malone T.W.
        Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.
        Science. 2010; 330: 686-688https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
        • Psutka S.P.
        • Morgan T.
        • Albertsen M.
        • et al.
        The European Urology Commitment to Gender Equityand Diversity: Expanding Cognitive Diversity throughInclusivity at the Podium.
        European Urology. 2021; 80: 450-453https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.001
        • Chyu J.
        • Peters C.E.
        • Nicholson T.M.
        • et al.
        Women in Leadership in Urology: The Case for Increasing Diversity and Equity.
        Urology. 2021; 150: 16-24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.079
        • Wallis C.J.
        • Ravi B.
        • Coburn N.
        • Nam R.K.
        • Detsky A.S.
        • Satkunasivam R.
        Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: A population based matched cohort study.
        BMJ (Online). 2017; : 359https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4366
        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        2019 Fall Applicant, Matriculant, and Enrollment Data Tables. 2019;
      1. United States Census Bureau. American Community Survey.
        • Acuña A.J.
        • Sato E.H.
        • Jella T.K.
        • et al.
        How Long Will It Take to Reach Gender Parity in Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States? An Analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry.
        Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2021; 479: 1179-1189https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001724
        • Bennett C.L.
        • Baker O.
        • Rangel E.L.
        • Marsh R.H.
        The Gender Gap in Surgical Residencies.
        JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2171
      2. The American Urological Association. 2020-2021: Urologists in Training Residents and Fellows in the United States. Published online 2022 .

        • The American Urological Association
        2021: The State of the Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States. 2022;
        • Prunty M.
        • Rhodes S.
        • Sun H.
        • et al.
        Redefining the Gender Gap in Urology Authorship: An 18-Year Publication Analysis.
        European Urology Focus. Published online. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.12.001
        • Zillioux J.
        • Tuong M.
        • Patel N.
        • Shah J.
        • Rapp D.E.
        Trends in Female Authorship Within Urologic Literature: A Comparison of 2012 and 2017.
        Urology. 2021; 150: 35-40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.039
        • Shukla D.C.
        • Simma-Chiang V.
        • Kyprianou N.
        • Tewari A.K.
        • Lundon D.J.
        Does Gender Matter in Academic Surgery? Author and Mentor Gender Impact Publication Citations in Surgical Research.
        Urology. 2021; 157: 64-70https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.049
        • Richter K.P.
        • Clark L.
        • Wick J.A.
        • et al.
        Women Physicians and Promotion in Academic Medicine.
        New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 383: 2148-2157https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1916935
        • Jena A.B.
        • Olenski A.R.
        • Blumenthal D.M.
        Sex differences in physician salary in US public medical schools.
        JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016; 176: 1294-1304https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284
        • Han J.
        • Stillings S.
        • Hamann H.
        • Terry R.
        • Moy L.
        Gender and Subspecialty of Urology Faculty in Department-based Leadership Roles.
        Urology. 2017; 110: 36-39https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.044
        • Rickard M.
        • Hannick J.H.
        • Blais A.S.
        • Wang J.
        • Santos J.Dos
        • Lorenzo A.J.
        Female Authorship Publishing Trends and Forecasting in Pediatric Urology: Are We Closer to Gender Equality?.
        Urology. 2020; 139: 141-150https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.037
        • Prunty M.
        • Rhodes S.
        • Sun H.
        • et al.
        A Seat at the Table: The Correlation Between Female Authorship and Urology Journal Editorial Board Membership.
        European Urology Focus. 2022; (Published online November 1) (Published online November 1)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.009
        • Harris A.M.
        • Teplitsky S.
        • Kraft K.H.
        • Fang R.
        • Meeks W.
        • North A.
        Burnout: A Call to Action From the AUA Workforce Workgroup.
        Journal of Urology. 2023; (Published online January 4) (Published online January 4)https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003108
        • Williams T.E.
        • Satiani B.
        • Thomas A.
        • Ellison E.C.
        The impending shortage and the estimated cost of training the future surgical workforce.
        Annals of Surgery. 2009; 250: 590-596https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b6c90b
        • Nam C.S.
        • Daignault-Newton S.
        • Kraft K.H.
        • Herrel L.A.
        Projected US Urology Workforce per Capita, 2020-2060.
        JAMA Network Open. 2021; (Published online) (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33864
        • Nam C.S.
        • Daignault-Newton S.
        • Herrel L.A.
        • Kraft K.H.
        The Future is Female: Urology Workforce Projection From 2020 to 2060.
        Urology. 2021; 150: 30-34https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.043
        • Koo K.
        • North A.C.
        • Granberg C.F.
        Trends in FemaleRepresentation in UrologyResidency: Impact onWorkforce Projections.
        Urology. 2021; 147: 324-325https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.047
        • Rahman R.
        • Zhang B.
        • Humbyrd C.J.
        • LaPorte D.
        How Do Medical Students Perceive Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery, and How Do Their Perceptions Change After an Orthopaedic Clinical Rotation?.
        Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2021; 479: 434-444https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001569
        • Silver M.P.
        • Williams S.A.
        Reluctance to Retire: A Qualitative Study on Work Identity, Intergenerational Conflict, and Retirement in Academic Medicine.
        The Gerontologist. 2018; 58: 320-330https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw142
      3. Society of Women in Urology. SIWU Speaker Database. Published 2022. Accessed February 4, 2022 . 〈https://swiu.org/resources/speaker-db.aspx〉

      4. Society of Urologic Oncology. Women in Urologic Oncology Directory. Published 2022. Accessed February 4, 2022 . 〈https://suonet.org/about-us/wuo/directory.aspx〉