To describe the initial outcomes of a new multidisciplinary gender-affirming surgery (GAS) program comprised of plastic and urologic surgeons.
We retrospectively examined consecutive patients who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty or vulvoplasty between April 2018 and May 2021. We used logistic regression modeling to analyze associations between pre-operative risk factors and post-operative complications.
Between April 2018 and May 2021, 77 genital GAS (gender-affirming surgery) procedures were performed at our institution (56 vaginoplasties, 21 vulvoplasties). All surgeries were performed in combination with urology and plastic surgery primarily using the perineal penile inversion technique. Mean patient age was 39.6 years, and mean BMI was 26.2 (Table 1a). The most common pre-existing conditions were hypertension and depression, with nearly 14% of patients reporting a previous suicide attempt.
The complication rate for vaginoplasty was 53.7% within the first 30 days (Table 4). The most common complications were yeast infection (14.8%) and hematoma (9.3%). For vulvoplasty, the 30-day complication rate was 57.1%, with urinary tract infection (14.3%) and granulation tissue (9.5%) being the most common. 88.1% and 91.7% of the complications were Clavien-Dindo grade I or II for vaginoplasties and vulvoplasties, respectively. No association was found between pre-operative patient factors and post-operative complications. Revision surgeries were performed for 38.9% of vaginoplasty patients during the study period, most commonly including urethral revision (29.6%), labia majoraplasty (20.4%), and labia minoraplasty (14.8%).
Collaboration between urology and plastic surgery is a safe and effective means to establish a GAS program.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Urology
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States?.UCLA Williams Institude of Law, 2016 (Accessed June 2, 2021)
- The phenomenology of gender dysphoria in adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.Clin Psychol Rev. 2020; 80: 1-2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101875
- The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey.National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016: 5-6 (Accessed June 2, 2021)
- WHOQOL-100 Before and After Sex Reassignment Surgery in Brazilian Male-to-Female Transsexual Individuals.J Sex Med. 2016; 13: 988-993https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.03.370
- Sexual and Physical Health After Sex Reassignment Surgery.Arch Sex Behav. 2005; 34: 679-690https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-7926-5
- Association Between Gender-Affirming Surgeries and Mental Health Outcomes.JAMA Surg. 2021; 156: 611-618https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0952
- Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States.JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 609-616https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6231
- Demographic and temporal trends in transgender identities and gender confirming surgery.Transl Androl Urol. 2019; 8: 184-190https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.04.09
- How Accessible Is Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery for Transgender Patients With Commercial and Public Health Insurance in the United States? Results of a Patient-Modeled Search for Services and a Survey of Providers.Sex Med. 2020; 8: 664-672https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.005
- Outcome of Vaginoplasty in Male-to-Female Transgenders: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques.J Sex Med. 2015; 12: 1499-1512https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12868
- Systematic review of studies reporting perioperative and functional outcomes following male-to-female gender assignment surgery (MtoF GAS): a call for standardization in data reporting.Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol. 2019; 71: 479-486https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03407-6
- Robotic Peritoneal Flap Revision of Gender Affirming Vaginoplasty: a Novel Technique for Treating Neovaginal Stenosis.Urology. 2021; 154: 308-314https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.024
- Penile inversion vaginoplasty outcomes: Complications and satisfaction.Andrology. 2021; (Published online May 27): 1-2https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13030
- Vaginoplasty Complications.Clin Plast Surg. 2018; 45: 361-368https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.03.007
- Predictors of Patient Satisfaction and Postoperative Complications in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 911e-921ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004427
- Surgical Outcome after Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: A Retrospective Study of 475 Transgender Women.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 999-1007https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002684
- Male-to-Female Gender Reassignment Surgery: An Institutional Analysis of Outcomes, Short-term Complications, and Risk Factors for 240 Patients Undergoing Penile-Inversion Vaginoplasty.Urology. 2019; 131: 228-233https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.043
- Postoperative Complications following Primary Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty among 330 Male-to-Female Transgender Patients.J Urol. 2018; 199: 760-765https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.013
Accepted: March 1, 2023
Received: December 21, 2022
Publication stageIn Press Journal Pre-Proof
Conflict of Interest declaration: The authors declare that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.