Advertisement

Prenatal Diagnosis of Bladder Exstrophy and OEIS over 20 Years

Published:November 29, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.020

      Abstract

      Objective

      To examine the prenatal diagnosis rates of bladder exstrophy (BE) and Omphalocele-Exstrophy-Imperforate anus-Spinal Defect Syndrome (OEIS) in a large cohort of patients over a 20-year period. We hypothesized that prenatal diagnosis rates improved over time due to evolving techniques in fetal imaging.

      Methods

      A multi-institutional database was queried to identify BE or OEIS patients who underwent primary closure between 2000 and 2020. We retrospectively determined prenatal or postnatal diagnosis. Those with unknown prenatal history were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate temporal pattern in rate of prenatal diagnosis while adjusting for sex and treating institution.

      Results

      Among 197 BE and 52 OEIS patients, 155 BE and 45 OEIS patients had known prenatal history. Overall prenatal diagnosis rates of BE and OEIS were 47.1% (73/155) and 82.2% (37/45), respectively. Prenatal diagnosis rate was significantly lower in BE compared to OEIS (P <.0001). The prenatal diagnosis rate for BE significantly increased over time (OR 1.10; [95%CI: 1.03-1.17]; P = .003). Between 2000 and 2005, the prenatal diagnosis rate of BE was 30.3% (10/33). Between 2015 and 2020, prenatal diagnosis rate of BE was 61.1% (33/54). Prenatal diagnosis rate for OEIS did not change over time. Rates of prenatal diagnosis did not differ by sex or treating institution.

      Conclusion

      Rates of prenatal diagnosis of BE and OEIS are higher than previously reported. Prenatal diagnosis rate of BE doubled in the last 5 years compared to the first 5 years of the study period. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of both BE and OEIS patients remain undiagnosed prior to delivery.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hall SA
        • Manyevitch R
        • Mistry PK
        • et al.
        New insights on the basic science of bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex.
        Urology. 2020; 147: 256-263
        • Gondo K
        • Yokomine M
        • Yoshizato T
        • et al.
        Clues and pitfalls in prenatal diagnosis of classic cloacal exstrophy using ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging: a case with sequential observation from 17 to 30 weeks' gestation and literature review.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020; 46: 1443-1449
        • Weiss DA
        • Oliver ER
        • Borer JG
        • et al.
        Key anatomic findings on fetal ultrasound and MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of bladder and cloacal exstrophy.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2020; 16: 665-671
        • Gearhart JP
        • Ben-Chaim J
        • Jeffs RD
        • et al.
        Criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 961-964
        • Goldman S
        • Patricia OS
        • Rondon A
        • et al.
        Prenatal diagnosis of bladder exstrophy by fetal MRI.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2013; 9: 3-6
        • Goyal A
        • Fishwick J
        • Hurrell R
        • et al.
        Antenatal diagnosis of bladder/cloacal exstrophy: challenges and possible solutions.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2012; 8: 140-144
        • Jayachandran D
        • Bythell M
        • Platt MW
        • et al.
        Register based study of bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex: prevalence, associated anomalies, prenatal diagnosis and survival.
        J Urol. 2011; 186: 2056-2060
        • Gambhir L
        • Holler T
        • Muller M
        • et al.
        Epidemiological survey of 214 families with bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex.
        J Urol. 2008; 179: 1539-1543
        • Hsieh K
        • O'Loughlin MT
        • Ferrer FA
        Bladder exstrophy and phenotypic gender determination on fetal magnetic resonance imaging.
        Urology. 2005; 65: 998-999
        • Cacciari A
        • Pilu GL
        • Mordenti M
        • et al.
        Prenatal diagnosis of bladder exstrophy: what counseling?.
        J Urol. 1999; 161 (discussion 262): 259-261
        • Siddique J
        • Lauderdale DS
        • VanderWeele TJ
        • et al.
        Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006.
        Med Care. 2009; 47: 1129-1135
        • O'Keeffe DF
        • Abuhamad A
        Obstetric ultrasound utilization in the United States: data from various health plans.
        Semin Perinatol. 2013; 37: 292-294