Advertisement

Gender Disparities and Differences Among Urologists Included in Top Doctor Lists

Published:November 28, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.012

      Objective

      To understand gender trends among urologists included in “Top Doctor” lists as more women practice urology, we (1) Evaluated whether Top Doctor lists reflect a contemporary distribution of urologists by gender; (2) Describe regional differences in gender composition of lists; (3) Report similarities and differences among men and women Top Doctors.

      Methods

      All urologists in regional Top Doctor Castle Connolly lists published in magazines between January 1, 2020 and June 22, 2021 were included. Physician attributes were abstracted. American Urological Association (AUA) census data was used to compare the number of men and women Top Doctor urologists to the number of practicing men and women urologists within each list's zip codes. Log odds ratios (OR) and (95% confidence intervals) were used to compare likelihood of list inclusion by gender overall and by region.

      Results

      Four hundred and ninety-four Top Doctor urologists from 25 lists were analyzed, of which 42 (8.50%) were women. Women urologists comprised 0%-27.8% of each list, with 7 lists (28.0%) including zero women urologists. Using AUA census data, OR for list inclusion of men urologists compared to women was 1.31 (1.01, 1.70) overall, with OR = 0.78 (0.36, 1.72) in the West, OR = 1.39 (1.03, 1.89) South, OR = 1.46 (0.8, 2.67) Northeast, OR = 1.90 (0.50, 7.18) Midwest. Women top urologists completed fellowship more often than men (66.7%, 55.1%) and were significantly more likely to complete female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) fellowship (P <.001).

      Conclusion

      Men urologists were significantly more likely to be included in Top Doctor lists than women urologists. Top women urologists were significantly more likely to complete FPMRS fellowship
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bennett CL
        • Baker O
        • Rangel EL
        • Marsh RH.
        The gender gap in surgical residencies.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 893-894
        • Association AU.
        The State of Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States.
        Urology Workforce Census Bureau. 2020; 7
        • Haskins J.
        Where are all the women in surgery?.
        AAMC Diversity and Inclusion | Med Educ. 2019;
        • Salles A
        • Awad M
        • Goldin L
        • et al.
        Estimating implicit and explicit gender bias among health care professionals and surgeons.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2e196545
        • Freedman-Weiss MR
        • Chiu AS
        • Heller DR
        • et al.
        Understanding the barriers to reporting sexual harassment in surgical training.
        Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 608-613
        • Bernardi K
        • Shah P
        • Lyons NB
        • et al.
        Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: a multicenter mixed methods study.
        Surgery. 2020; 167: 743-750
        • Holton MR
        • Bailey K.
        Women in urology.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2021; 48: 187-194
        • Porten SP
        • Gaither TW
        • Greene KL
        • Baradaran N
        • Anger JT
        • Breyer BN.
        Do Women Work Less Than Men in Urology: Data From the American Urological Association Census.
        Urology. 2018; 118: 71-75
        • Wun YT
        • Lam TP
        • Lam KF
        • Goldberg D
        • Li DK
        • Yip KC.
        How do patients choose their doctors for primary care in a free market?.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16: 1215-1220
        • Emmert M
        • Sander U
        • Pisch F.
        Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.
        J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15: e24
        • Kadry B
        • Chu LF
        • Kadry B
        • Gammas D
        • Macario A.
        Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
        J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13: e95
        • Lopez A
        • Detz A
        • Ratanawongsa N
        • Sarkar U.
        What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27: 685-692
        • Gao GG
        • McCullough JS
        • Agarwal R
        • Jha AK.
        A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
        J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14: e38
        • Lagu T
        • Hannon NS
        • Rothberg MB
        • Lindenauer PK.
        Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25: 942-946
        • Ikonen C.
        Top doctor warns of new symptom that could be added to official Covid-19 list.
        Hereford Times (Hereford, England). 2020;
        • O'Dowd A.
        UK must become more self reliant for sake of healthcare workforce, says top doctor.
        BMJ. 2019; 367
        • Levine J.
        Sitting down is KILLING you! Heart disease, obesity, depression and crumbling bones - a terrifying new book by a top doctor reveals they are all linked to the hours we spend in chairs.
        Daily Mail. 2014;
        • Holliday AM
        • Kachalia A
        • Meyer GS
        • Sequist TD.
        Physician and patient views on public physician rating websites: a cross-sectional study.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32: 626-631
        • Donnally 3rd, CJ
        • Li DJ
        • Maguire Jr., JA
        • et al.
        How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
        Spine J. 2018; 18: 2081-2090
      1. Connolly C. Nominations. https://nominations.castleconnolly.com/login

        • Breyer BN
        • Butler C
        • Fang R
        • et al.
        Promotion disparities in academic urology.
        Urology. 2020; 138: 16-23
        • Wenzel J
        • Dudley A
        • Agnor R
        • et al.
        Women are underrepresented in prestigious recognition awards in the american urological association.
        Urology. 2022; 160: 102-108
        • Silver JK
        • Slocum CS
        • Bank AM
        • et al.
        Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies.
        PM R. 2017; 9: 804-815
        • Silver JK
        • Bank AM
        • Slocum CS
        • et al.
        Women physicians underrepresented in American Academy of Neurology recognition awards.
        Neurology. 2018; 91: e603-e614
        • Calderwood AH
        • Roberts JA
        • Silver JK
        • Schmitt CM
        • Enestvedt BK.
        Representation by Gender of Recognition Award Recipients from Gastroenterology and Hepatology Professional Societies.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30: 1508-1518
        • Huang BI.
        The ‘inexorable zero.
        Harv Law Rev. 2004; 117: 1215-1235
      2. Sarsons H. Interpreting Signals in the Labor Market: Evidence from Medical Referrals. 2017. Available at: https://scholarharvardedu/files/sarsons/files/sarsons_jmp.pdf. Accessed 8/18/2022.

        • McGrath RJ
        • Priestley J.L.
        • Zhou Y.
        • Culligan P.J.
        The validity of online patient ratings of physicians: analysis of physician peer reviews and patient ratings.
        JMIR. 2018; 7
        • Saifee DH
        • Hudnall M.
        • Raja U.
        Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians' Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews.
        JMIR. 2022; 24
        • Dunivin Z
        • Zadunayski L
        • Baskota U
        • Siek K
        • Mankoff J
        Gender, soft skills, and patient experience in online physician reviews: a large-scale text analysis.
        J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22: e14455
        • Ko DG
        • Mai F.
        • Shan Z.
        • Zhang D.
        Operational efficiency and patient-centered health care: a view from online physician reviews.
        Operations Management. 2019; 65