Advertisement

Kidney stone prevalence based on self-report and Electronic Health Records: insight into the prevalence of active medical care for kidney stones

Published:November 23, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.009

      Objective

      To compare rates of patient-reported kidney stone disease to Electronic Health Records (EHR) kidney stone diagnosis using a common dataset to evaluate for socio-demographic differences, including between those with and without active care.

      Methods

      From the All of Us research database, we identified 21,687 adult participants with both patient-reported and EHR data.  We compared differences in age, sex, race, education, employment status and healthcare access between patients with self-reported kidney stone history without EHR data to those with EHR-based diagnoses.

      Results

      In this population, the self-reported prevalence of kidney stones was 8.6% overall (n=1877), including 4.6% (n=1004) who had self-reported diagnoses but no EHR data. Among those with self-reported kidney stone diagnoses only, the median age was 66. The EHR-based prevalence of kidney stones was 5.7% (n=1231), median age 67. No differences were observed in age, sex, education, employment status, rural/urban status, or ability to afford healthcare between groups with EHR diagnosis or self-reported diagnosis only. Of patients who had a self-reported history of kidney stones, 24% reported actively seeing a provider for kidney stones.

      Conclusions

      Kidney stone prevalence by self-report is higher than EHR-based prevalence in this national dataset. Using either method alone to estimate kidney stone prevalence may exclude some patients with the condition, although the demographic profile of both groups is similar.  Approximately one in four patients report actively seeing a provider for stone disease.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Scales Jr., CD
        • Smith AC
        • Hanley JM
        • Saigal CS
        Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.
        European urology. 2012; 62: 160-165
        • Penniston KL
        • McLaren ID
        • Greenlee RT
        • Nakada SY.
        Urolithiasis in a rural Wisconsin population from 1992 to 2008: narrowing of the male-to-female ratio.
        The Journal of urology. 2011; 185: 1731-1736
        • Semins MJ
        • Trock BJ
        • Matlaga BR.
        Validity of administrative coding in identifying patients with upper urinary tract calculi.
        The Journal of urology. 2010; 184: 190-192
        • Ward MM.
        Estimating disease prevalence and incidence using administrative data: some assembly required.
        J Rheumatol. 2013; 40: 1241-1243
        • Yabroff KR
        • Warren JL
        • Banthin J
        • et al.
        Comparison of approaches for estimating prevalence costs of care for cancer patients: what is the impact of data source?.
        Med Care. 2009; 47: S64-S69
        • Soucie JM
        • Coates RJ
        • McClellan W
        • Austin H
        • Thun M.
        Relation between geographic variability in kidney stones prevalence and risk factors for stones.
        American journal of epidemiology. 1996; 143: 487-495
        • Brikowski TH
        • Lotan Y
        • Pearle MS.
        Climate-related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States.
        Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008; 105: 9841-9846
        • Hill AJ
        • Basourakos SP
        • Lewicki P
        • et al.
        Incidence of Kidney Stones in the United States: The Continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
        The Journal of urology. 2021; (101097ju0000000000002331)
        • Ramirez AH
        • Sulieman L
        • Schlueter DJ
        • et al.
        The All of Us Research Program: data quality, utility, and diversity.
        medRxiv. 2020; (2020.2005.2029.20116905)
        • Denny JC
        • Rutter JL
        • Goldstein DB
        • et al.
        The "All of Us" Research Program.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2019; 381: 668-676
        • Curhan GC
        • Willett WC
        • Rimm EB
        • Stampfer MJ.
        A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones.
        The New England journal of medicine. 1993; 328: 833-838
        • Golomb D
        • Nevo A
        • Goldberg H
        • Ehrlich Y
        • Margel D
        • Lifshitz D.
        Long-Term Adherence to Medications in Secondary Prevention of Urinary Tract Stones.
        Journal of endourology. 2019; 33: 469-474
        • Brooks NA
        • Paul CJ
        • Ghareeb GM
        • Tracy CR.
        Pushing Stones Uphill: Why Patients Are Lost to Follow-Up After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy.
        Journal of endourology. 2017; 31: 135-140
        • Hosking DH
        • Erickson SB
        • Van den Berg CJ
        • Wilson DM
        • Smith LH.
        The stone clinic effect in patients with idiopathic calcium urolithiasis.
        The Journal of urology. 1983; 130: 1115-1118
        • Pearle MS
        • Goldfarb DS
        • Assimos DG
        • et al.
        Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline.
        The Journal of urology. 2014; 192: 316-324
        • Alkomos MF
        • Mendez D
        • Mazzei-Pifano D
        • et al.
        Patients' reasons for missing scheduled clinic appointments and their solutions at a major urban-based academic medical center.
        J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2020; 10: 426-430
        • Quarrier S
        • Li S
        • Penniston KL
        • et al.
        Lower Socioeconomic Status is Associated With Adverse Urinary Markers and Surgical Complexity in Kidney Stone Patients.
        Urology. 2020; 146: 67-71
        • Bayne DB
        • Usawachintachit M
        • Armas-Phan M
        • et al.
        Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Stone Burden at Presentation to Tertiary Referral Center: Data From the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.
        Urology. 2019; 131: 57-63
        • Sulieman L
        • Cronin RM
        • Carroll RJ
        • et al.
        Comparing medical history data derived from electronic health records and survey answers in the All of Us Research Program.
        Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2022;