Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusion
- Mari A
- Tellini R
- Antonelli A
- et al.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and Methods

Definition of Factors Related
Statistical Analysis
RESULTS
General Information of the Study
Univariable Logistic Regression Analysis
Late > 25% Loss of eGFR | AKI | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value |
Age | 1.04 | 1.01, 1.07 | .004 | 1.00 | 0.98, 1.02 | .72 |
Gender | ||||||
Female | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Male | 2.61 | 1.38, 5.31 | .005 | 3.06 | 1.82, 5.36 | <.001 |
BMI | 1.25 | 1.14, 1.38 | <.001 | 1.19 | 1.11, 1.29 | <.001 |
Diabetes | ||||||
Absent | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Present | 4.03 | 2.06, 7.69 | <.001 | 1.39 | 0.72, 2.58 | .30 |
Hypertension | ||||||
Absent | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Present | 2.43 | 1.38, 4.36 | .002 | 1.29 | 0.82, 2.02 | .27 |
Dyslipidemia | ||||||
Absent | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Present | 1.93 | 1.07, 3.44 | .03 | 1.00 | 0.59, 1.66 | .99 |
Operative time | 1.01 | 1.00, 1.02 | .002 | 1.02 | 1.01, 1.02 | <.001 |
OT >100 | 3.32 | 1.83, 6.29 | <.001 | 5.64 | 3.39, 9.71 | <.001 |
OT >110 | 4.17 | 2.35, 7.62 | <.001 | 3.36 | 2.12, 5.38 | <.001 |
EBL | 1.00 | 0.998, 1.001 | .96 | 1.00 | 1.00, 1.00 | .14 |
Ischemia time | 1.00 | 0.995, 1.014 | .40 | 1.04 | 1.01, 1.06 | .002 |
WIT>20 min in LPN and RAPN | 1.76 | 0.807, 4.161 | .17 | 1.99 | 1.08, 3.85 | .03 |
Uric acid preoperative | 1.00 | 1.000, 1.006 | .02 | 1.00 | 1.00, 1.01 | <.001 |
eGFR preoperative | 0.98 | 0.964, 0.991 | .0012 | 0.98 | 0.96, 0.99 | <.001 |
eGFR 1-d postoperative | 0.96 | 0.944,0.971 | <.001 | |||
AKI | 7.52 | 4.18, 13.81 | <.001 | |||
ZS score | 1.27 | 1.11,1.46 | <.001 | 1.52 | 1.34, 1.74 | <.001 |
RENAL score | 1.13 | 0.96, 1.33 | .15 | 1.51 | 1.31, 1.76 | <.001 |
PADUA score | 1.09 | 0.93, 1.29 | .29 | 1.52 | 1.32, 1.77 | <.001 |
Diameter | 1.29 | 1.09, 1.52 | .035 | 1.69 | 1.44, 2.00 | <.001 |
DAP score | 1.39 | 1.05, 1.87 | .003 | 1.84 | 1.53, 2.23 | <.001 |
DAP diameter level | ||||||
< 2.4 cm | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
2.4 cm - 4.4 cm | 4.52 | 1.73, 15.49 | .006 | 1.82 | 0.97, 3.59 | .07 |
> 4.4 cm | 8.17 | 2.97, 28.85 | <.001 | 5.16 | 2.63, 10.66 | <.001 |
C-Index | 0.58 | 0.42,0.78 | <.001 | 0.44 | 0.33, 0.58 | <.001 |
Invision score | 1.15 | 1.01, 1.31 | .03 | 1.29 | 1.16, 1.44 | <.001 |
NePhRO score | 1.27 | 1.09, 1.49 | .003 | 1.46 | 1.27, 1.68 | <.001 |
Exploration of Predictive Factors Based on Multivariable Analysis
Multivariable Model | ||
---|---|---|
Variable | OR (95%CI) | P value |
Age | 1.05(1.02, 1.09) | .0039 |
BMI | 1.18(1.06, 1.33) | .0049 |
Diabetes | 2.51(1.05, 5.87) | .0351 |
OT > 110 min | 2.82(1.42, 5.75) | .0034 |
Diameter level of DAP score | ||
< 2.4 cm | Ref. | |
2.4 cm-4.4 cm | 3.73(1.33, 13.45) | .0225 |
> 4.4 cm | 4.12(1.35, 15.64) | .0207 |
AKI | 5.07(2.56, 10.27) | <.001 |
Verification of the Predictive Model

DISCUSSION
- Mari A
- Tellini R
- Antonelli A
- et al.
- Mari A
- Tellini R
- Antonelli A
- et al.
CONCLUSION
Author Contributions
Trial Registration
Appendix. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
References
- EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 913-924https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005
- The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.J Urol. 2009; 182: 844-853https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
- A Nomogram for the prediction of intermediate significant renal function loss after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a prospective multicenter observational study (RECORd2 Project).Eur Urol Focus. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.012
- Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.Crit Care. 2004; 8: R204-R212https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2872
- Preoperative radiographic parameters predict long-term renal impairment following partial nephrectomy.World J Urol. 2013; 31: 817-822https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0694-z
- The predictive role of biomarkers for the detection of acute kidney injury after partial or radical nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature.Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 6: 344-353https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.09.020
- Decline in renal function after partial nephrectomy: etiology and prevention.J Urol. 2015; 193: 1889-1898https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.093
- Predictive value of nephrometry scores in nephron-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 6: 490-504https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.004
- A Nomogram to predict significant estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction after robotic partial nephrectomy.Eur Urol. 2018; 74: 833-839https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.037
- Independent external validation of a nomogram to define risk categories for a significant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.Int J Urol. 2021; 28: 75-79https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14404
- Does glomerular filtration rate at discharge after partial nephrectomy predict long-term glomerular filtration rate stability?.J Endourol. 2019; 33: 488-491https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0869
- Clinical and histologic predictors of renal function decline after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.J Endourol. 2011; 25: 1435-1441https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0646
- Assessing time of full renal recovery following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.Urology. 2018; 112: 98-102https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.004
- Are warm ischemia and ischemia time still predictive factors of poor renal function after partial nephrectomy in the setting of elective indication?.World J Urol. 2015; 33: 11-15https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1292-7
- Functional recovery after partial nephrectomy: effects of volume loss and ischemic injury.J Urol. 2012; 187: 1667-1673https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.068
- A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy.Eur Urol. 2015; 68: 980-992https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.010
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Funding Support: This study was funded by grants from Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2019SY073), Zhongshan Hospital Science Foundation (2020ZHZS20, 2020ZSLC16),National Natural Science Foundation of China (62273099) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22ZR1458000, 22Y11905300). All these study sponsors have no roles in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and in the interpretation of data.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy