Advertisement

Applying Representation Quotient Methodology to Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Trends of Applicants and Matriculants to Urology Residency Programs from 2010–2018

Published:November 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.09.032

      Abstract

      Objective

      To accurately examine the trends in the racial and gender composition of medical students applying and matriculating to urology residency programs.

      Methods

      Reports on race/ethnicity and gender for medical school graduates, and urology residency applicants and matriculants were obtained for years 2010-2018. The proportions of individuals representing different racial and gender identities among urology applicants and matriculants were divided by a denominator of their proportion in medical school graduating classes to produce representation quotients (RQapp and RQmat, respectively). Linear regression models were performed on yearly RQs to estimate the RQ changes over time. Non-parametric testing was used to evaluate for differences in applicant to matriculant representation within each identity. ANOVA was performed separately on RQapp and RQmat values to assess differences in representation between identities in the applicant and matriculant populations.

      Results

      Asian men experienced increases in representation among urology applicants (RQapp: slope 2.04 × 10−2; p=0.03) and matriculants (RQmat slope: 7.46 × 10−2; p=0.0076) during the study period. Black men trended towards underrepresentation among applicants (RQapp slope –1.51 × 10−1; p=0.03) and matriculants (RQmat slope: –1.71 × 10−1; p=0.02). When examining genders, both men (RQapp=1.43 vs. RQmat=1.44; p=0.80) and women (RQapp=0.52 vs. RQmat=0.51; p=0.67) had unchanged representation in the applicant and matriculant cohorts, but women severely underrepresented on average.

      Conclusions

      Women and Black men are underrepresented in the urology workforce. These concerning findings demonstrate the dire need for initiatives regarding recruitment into urology to support and to ensure successful entry into the field for minority groups.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cooper LA
        • Roter DL
        • Johnson RL
        • Ford DE
        • Steinwachs DM
        • Powe NR.
        Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race.
        Ann Intern Med. Dec 2 2003; 139: 907-915https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009
        • Marrast LM
        • Zallman L
        • Woolhandler S
        • Bor DH
        • McCormick D.
        Minority physicians' role in the care of underserved patients: diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities.
        JAMA Intern Med. Feb 1 2014; 174: 289-291https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12756
        • Komaromy M
        • Grumbach K
        • Drake M
        • et al.
        The role of black and Hispanic physicians in providing health care for underserved populations.
        N Engl J Med. May 16 1996; 334: 1305-1310https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199605163342006
        • Lett E
        • Murdock HM
        • Orji WU
        • Aysola J
        • Sebro R.
        Trends in Racial/Ethnic Representation Among US Medical Students.
        JAMA Netw Open. Sep 4 2019; 2e1910490https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490
        • Shantharam G
        • Tran TY
        • McGee H
        • Thavaseelan S.
        Examining Trends in Underrepresented Minorities in Urology Residency.
        Urology. May 2019; 127: 36-41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.061
        • Washington 3rd, SL
        • Baradaran N
        • Gaither TW
        • et al.
        Racial distribution of urology workforce in United States in comparison to general population.
        Transl Androl Urol. Aug 2018; 7: 526-534https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.05.16
        • Marthi S
        • Enemchukwu E
        • Thavaseelan S.
        Defining the Variance: The Current State of Female and URM Concordance of Urology Resident Workforce to the General U.S. Population.
        Urology. Apr 2022; 162: 116-120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.039
        • Simons ECG
        • Arevalo A
        • Washington SL
        • et al.
        Trends in the Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the US Urology Workforce.
        Urology. Apr 2022; 162: 9-19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.038
        • Benjamini Y
        • Krieger AM
        • Yekutieli D.
        Adaptive Linear Step-up Procedures That Control the False Discovery Rate.
        Biometrika. 2006; 93: 491-507
        • Barzansky B
        • Hash RB
        • Catanese V
        • Waechter D.
        What Is the Role of Accreditation in Achieving Medical School Diversity?.
        AMA J Ethics. Dec 1 2021; 23: E946-E952https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.946
      1. 2021 Fall Applicant, Matriculant, and Enrollment Data Tables. Accessed June 10, 2022, https://www.aamc.org/media/57761/download?attachment

      2. Altering the Course: BLACK MALES IN MEDICINE. Accessed August 22nd, 2022, https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/84/

        • Wong D
        • Kuprasertkul A
        • Khouri Jr., RK
        • Ganesan V
        • Kenigsberg AP
        • Lemack GE
        Assessing the Female and Underrepresented Minority Medical Student Experience in the Urology Match: Where Do We Fall Short?.
        Urology. Jan 2021; 147: 57-63https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.076
        • Dai JC
        • Agochukwu-Mmonu N
        • Hittelman AB.
        Strategies for Attracting Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Urology.
        Curr Urol Rep. Sep 2 2019; 20: 61https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0921-5
        • Weissbart SJ
        • Stock JA
        • Wein AJ.
        Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
        Urology. Apr 2015; 85: 731-736https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.041
        • Rojek AE
        • Khanna R
        • Yim JWL
        • et al.
        Differences in Narrative Language in Evaluations of Medical Students by Gender and Under-represented Minority Status.
        J Gen Intern Med. May 2019; 34: 684-691https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04889-9
        • Boatright D
        • Ross D
        • O'Connor P
        • Moore E
        • Nunez-Smith M
        Racial Disparities in Medical Student Membership in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society.
        JAMA Intern Med. May 1 2017; 177: 659-665https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9623
        • Ellis J
        • Otugo O
        • Landry A
        • Landry A.
        Interviewed while Black.
        N Engl J Med. Dec 17 2020; 383: 2401-2404https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2023999
        • Williams M
        • Kim EJ
        • Pappas K
        • et al.
        The impact of United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) step 1 cutoff scores on recruitment of underrepresented minorities in medicine: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
        Health Sci Rep. Jun 2020; 3: e2161https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.161
        • Sajadi-Ernazarova K
        • Ramoska EA
        • Saks MA.
        USMLE Scores Do Not Predict the Clinical Performance of Emergency Medicine Residents.
        Mediterranean Journal of Emergency Medicine & Acute Care. 2020; 1
        • Miller B
        • Dewar SB
        • Nowalk A.
        74. LACK OF CORRELATION BETWEEN USMLE SCORES AND PERFORMANCE IN PEDIATRICS RESIDENCY TRAINING BASED ON ACGME MILESTONES RATINGS.
        Academic Pediatrics. 2019; 19: e34
        • Chisholm LP
        • Drolet BC.
        USMLE Step 1 Scoring Changes and the Urology Residency Application Process: Program Directors' Perspectives.
        Urology. Nov 2020; 145: 79-82https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.033
        • Velez D
        • Ashok A
        • Greenberg R
        • et al.
        Rising Tides: Challenges and Opportunities for Women in the Urologic Workforce.
        Urology. Apr 2021; 150: 47-53https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.014
      3. Urology Unbound. Accessed June 10, 2022, https://urologyunbound.org/about-us

        • Wallace NO
        • Pittman AB
        • Wilson SN.
        The R Frank Jones Urology Interest Group: An Intentional and Strategic Pipeline Program to Increase Diversity in Urology.
        Urology. Apr 2022; 162: 27-32https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.047
        • Cannon S
        • Dy GW
        • Seideman C.
        Urologists for Equity: Letter to the Urologic Community.
        Urology. Nov 2020; 145: 302-304https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.001
      4. Welcome to the UReTER (UnderRepresented Trainees Entering Residency) Mentorship Program! Accessed June 10, 2022, https://urology.ucsf.edu/UReTER#.YqOfpuxKiEt

      5. Michigan Urology Academy (MUA). Accessed June 10, 2022, https://medicine.umich.edu/dept/urology/education/medical-students/michigan-urology-academy-mua

      6. 2021 Urology Residency Match Statistics. Accessed June 27, 2022, https://www.auanet.org/documents/education/specialty-match/2021-Urology-Residency-Match-Statistics.pdf

      7. Urology. Accessed June 15, 2022, https://services.aamc.org/eras/erasstats/par/display.cfm?NAV_ROW=PAR&SPEC_CD=480