Advertisement

Underinsurance And Multiple Surgical Treatments for Kidney Stones

Published:September 25, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.09.004

      Objective

      To further elucidate the relationship between low socioeconomic status (SES) and larger, more complex stones requiring staged surgical interventions. Specifically, we aimed to determine if underinsurance (Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay insurance types) is associated with multiple surgeries within 1 year.

      Methods

      We performed a retrospective longitudinal analysis of prospectively collected data from the California statewide Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) dataset. We included adult patients who had their first recorded kidney stone encounter between 2009 and 2018 and underwent at least 1 urologic stone procedure. We followed these patients within the dataset for one year after their initial surgery to assess for factors predicting multiple surgical treatments for stones.

      Results

      A total of 156,319 adults were included in the study. The proportions of individuals in private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare and self-pay/indigent groups differed by the presence or absence of additional surgeries (64.0%, 13.5%, 19.4%, and 0.1%, vs 70.3%, 10.1%, 16.6%, and 0.1%, respectively). Compared to private insurance, Medicaid (1.46 [1.40-1.53] P < .001) and Medicare (1.15 [1.10-1.20] P < .001) insurance types were associated with significantly greater odds of multiple surgeries, whereas no significant association was seen in the self-pay/indigent insurance type (1.35 [0.83-2.19], P = 1.0).

      Conclusion

      In a statewide, California database from 2009 to 2018, underinsured adults had higher odds of undergoing a second procedure for kidney stones within 1 year of initial surgical treatment. This study adds to the expanding body of literature linking suboptimal healthcare access and disparate outcomes for kidney stone patients.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Scales Jr, CD
        • Smith AC
        • Hanley JM
        • et al.
        Urologic diseases in america project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.
        Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 160-165
        • Litwin MS
        • Saigal C.
        Urologic Diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
        US Government Printing Office, Washington2012: DC2012
        • Ziemba JB
        • Matlaga BR.
        Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis.
        Invest Clin Urol. 2017; 58: 299https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299
        • Scotland KB
        • Rudnick B
        • Healy KA
        • et al.
        Retrograde ureteroscopic management of large renal calculi: a single institutional experience and concise literature review.
        J Endourol. 2018; 32: 603-607https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0069
        • Turna B
        • Umul M
        • Demiryoguran S
        • et al.
        How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?.
        J Endourol. 2007; 21: 34-43https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.0315
        • Bayne DB
        • Usawachintachit M
        • Armas-Phan M
        • et al.
        Influence of socioeconomic factors on stone burden at presentation to tertiary referral center: data from the registry for stones of the kidney and ureter.
        Urology. 2019; 131: 57-63https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.009
        • Quarrier S
        • Li S
        • Penniston KL
        • et al.
        Lower socioeconomic status is associated with adverse urinary markers and surgical complexity in kidney stone patients.
        Urology. 2020; 146: 67-71https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.025
        • McMaughan DJ
        • Oloruntoba O
        • Smith ML
        Socioeconomic status and access to healthcare: interrelated drivers for healthy aging.
        Front Public Health. 2020; 8https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231
        • Christopher AS
        • McCormick D
        • Woolhandler S
        • et al.
        Access to care and chronic disease outcomes among medicaid-insured persons versus the uninsured.
        Am J Public Health. 2016; 106: 63-69https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302925
        • Stringhini S
        • Carmeli C
        • Jokela M
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women.
        Lancet North Am Ed. 2017; 389: 1229-1237https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32380-7
        • Bachour K
        • Rezaee ME
        • Swanton AR
        • et al.
        Understanding the relationship between health insurance and kidney stones: an examination of NHANES data.
        Can J Urol. 2020; 27 (PMID: 32544047): 10238-10243
        • Elder JW
        • Delgado MK
        • Chung BI
        • et al.
        Variation in the intensity of care for patients with uncomplicated renal colic presenting to U.S. emergency departments.
        J Emerg Med. 2016; 51: 628-635https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.037
      1. Available at:https://hcai.ca.gov/data-and-reports/request-data/, Accessed 8, 2021

        • R Core Team
        R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2020 (Available at) (Accessed February 5, 2022)
        • Brubaker WD
        • Dallas KB
        • Elliott CS
        • et al.
        Payer type, race/ethnicity, and the timing of surgical management of urinary stone disease.
        J Endourol. 2019; 33: 152-158https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0614
        • Herrick BW
        • Wallaert JB
        • Eisner BH
        • et al.
        Insurance status, stone composition, and 24-hour urine composition.
        J Endourol. 2013; 27: 652-656https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0490
        • Buchmueller TC
        • Grumbach K
        • Kronick R
        • et al.
        Book review: the effect of health insurance on medical care utilization and implications for insurance expansion: a review of the literature.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2005; 62: 3-30https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558704271718
        • Blackwell RH
        • Barton GJ
        • Kothari AN
        • et al.
        Early intervention during acute stone admissions: revealing “The Weekend Effect” in urological practice.
        J Urol. 2016; 196: 124-130https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.056
        • Kirshenbaum EJ
        • Doshi C
        • Dornbier R
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic disparities in the acute management of stone disease in the United States.
        J Endourol. 2019; 33: 167-172https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0760
        • Ho A
        • Sarmah P
        • Bres-Niewada E
        • et al.
        Ureteroscopy for stone disease: expanding roles in the modern era.
        Central Eur J Urol. 2017; 70https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2017.1343
        • Bagrodia A
        • Gupta A
        • Raman JD
        • et al.
        Predictors of cost and clinical outcomes of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.
        J Urol. 2009; 182: 586-590https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.014
        • Singh BP
        • Prakash J
        • Sankhwar SN
        • et al.
        Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.
        Urology. 2014; 83: 1016-1022
        • National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States
        With Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.
        National Center for Health Statistics (US), Hyattsville (MD)2015 (2016 May. Report No.: 2016-1232. PMID: 27308685)
        • Ski CF
        • King-Shier KM
        • Thompson DR.
        Gender, socioeconomic and ethnic/racial disparities in cardiovascular disease: a time for change.
        Int J Cardiol. 2014; 170: 255-257https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.082
        • Bailey ZD
        • Krieger N
        • Agénor M.
        • et al.
        Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.
        Lancet North Am Ed. 2017; 389: 1453-1463https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30569-x
        • Fiscella K
        • Sanders MR
        Racial and ethnic disparities in the quality of health care.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2016; 37: 375-394https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021439
        • Stormacq C
        • Van den Broucke S
        • Wosinski J
        • et al.
        Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review.
        Health Promot Int. 2018; 34: e1-e17https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day062
        • Crivelli JJ
        • Maalouf NM
        • Paiste HJ
        • et al.
        Disparities in kidney stone disease: a scoping review.
        J Urol. 2021; 206: 517-525https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000001846
        • Teisberg E
        • Wallace S
        • O’Hara S
        • et al.
        Defining and implementing value-based health care.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95: 682-685https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003122
      2. 2021 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Introduction and Methods.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2021 (AHRQ Publication No.21(22)-0054-EF)