Advertisement

Two Specialists, Two Recommendations: Discordance Between Urologists’ & Radiation Oncologists’ Prostate Cancer Treatment Recommendations

      Abstract

      Objective

      To examine the treatment recommendation patterns among urologists and radiation oncologists, the level of concordance or discordance between physician recommendations, and the association between physician recommendations and the treatment that patients received.

      Method

      The study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial conducted November 2010 to April 2014 (NCT02053389). Eligible participants were patients from the trial who saw both specialists. The primary outcome was physician recommendations that were scored using an adapted version of the validated PhyReCS coding system. Secondary outcomes included concordance between physician recommendations and the treatment patients received.

      Results

      Participants were 108 patients (Mean age 61.9 years; range 43-82; 87% non-Hispanic White). Urologists were more likely to recommend surgery (79% of recommendations) and radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend radiation (68% of recommendations). Recommendations from the urologists and radiation oncologists were concordant for only 33 patients (30.6%). Most patients received a treatment that both physicians recommended (59%); however, 35% received a treatment that only one of their physicians recommended. When discordant, urologists more often recommended surgery and radiation oncologists recommended radiation and surgery as equally appropriate options.

      Conclusion

      Urologists and radiation oncologists are more likely to differ than agree in their treatment recommendations for the same patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and more likely to favor treatment aligned with their specialty. Additional studies are needed to better understand how patients make decisions after meeting with two different specialists to inform the development of best practices within oncology clinics.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Scherr KA
        • Fagerlin A
        • Hofer T
        • et al.
        Physician recommendations trump patient preferences in prostate cancer treatment decisions.
        Med Decis Making. 2017; 37: 56-69https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X16662841
        • Moore MJ
        • O'Sullivan B
        • Tannock IF.
        How expert physicians would wish to be treated if they had genitourinary cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 1988; 6: 1736-1745https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1988.6.11.1736
        • Fowler FJ
        • Collins MM
        • Albertsen PC
        • Zietman A
        • Elliott DB
        • Barry MJ.
        Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Article.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 3217https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.24.3217
        • Lavallée LT
        • Fergusson D
        • Mallick R
        • et al.
        Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: treatment recommendations differ between urologists and radiation oncologists. Article.
        PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: 1-1https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079773
        • Kim SP
        • Gross CP
        • Nguyen PY
        • et al.
        Specialty bias in treatment recommendations and quality of life among radiation oncologists and urologists for localized prostate cancer. Article.
        Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014; 17: 163-169https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2014.3
        • Ariane M
        • Ploussard G
        • Rebillard X
        • et al.
        Differences in practice patterns between urologists and radiation oncologists in the management of localized prostate cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Article.
        World J Urol. 2015; 33: 1741-1747https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1543-2
        • Hamdy FC
        • Donovan JL
        • Lane JA
        • et al.
        10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1415-1424https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220
        • Scherr K
        • Delaney RK
        • Ubel P
        • et al.
        Preparing patients with early stage prostate cancer to participate in clinical appointments using a shared decision making training video.
        Med Decis Making. 2021; 42: 364-374https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211028563
        • Scherr K
        • Fagerlin AW, LD
        • et al.
        The Physician Recommendation Coding System (PhyReCS): a reliable and valid method to quantify the strength of physician recommendations during clinical encounters.
        Med Decis Making. 2017; 37: 46-55
        • Shuman A
        • Larkin KT,D
        • et al.
        Patient reflections on decision making for laryngeal cancer treatment.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 156: 299-304