Advertisement

Evaluating Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Amongst Practicing Urologists: Analysis of the 2018 American Urological Association Census

      ABSTRACT

      Objective

      To describe factors associated with Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) participation using 2018 American Urological Association Census data. QIPS have become increasingly important in medicine. However, studies about QIPS in urology suggest low levels of participation, with little known about factors predicting non-participation.

      Methods

      Results from 2339 census respondents were weighted to estimate 12,660 practicing urologists in the United States. Our primary outcome was participation in QIPS. Predictor variables included demographics, practice setting, rurality, fellowship training, QIPS domains in practice, years in practice, and non-clinical/clinical workload.

      Results

      QIPS participants and non-participants significantly differed in distributions of age (P = .0299), gender (P = .0013), practice setting (P <.0001), employment (employee vs partner vs owner vs combination; P <.0001), and fellowship training (P <.0001). QIPS participants reported fewer years in practice (21.3 vs 25.9, P = .018) and higher clinical (45.2 vs 39.2, P = .022) and non-clinical (8.76 vs 5.28, P = .002) work hours per week. Non-participation was associated with male gender (OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.03-6.95) and Asian race (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.27-5.29) for quality programs and private practice settings (ORs = 8.72-27.8) for patient safety initiatives.

      Conclusion

      QIPS was associated with academic settings. Interventions to increase rates of quality and safety participation should target individual and system-level factors, respectively. Future work should discern barriers to QIPS engagement and its clinical benefits.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Plsek P
        Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2001 (Published online)
        • Berwick DM
        • Nolan TW
        • Whittington J.
        The triple aim: care, health, and cost.
        health aff (Millwood). 2008; 27: 759-769https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759
        • Bodenheimer T
        • Sinsky C.
        From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.
        Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12: 573-576https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1713
        • McCafferty MH
        • Polk HC.
        Patient safety and quality in surgery.
        Surg Clin North Am. 2007; 87: 867-881https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2007.06.001
        • Tyson MD
        • Barocas DA.
        Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2017; 27: 375-379https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000406
        • Richards KA
        • Cesario S
        • Lim AH
        • et al.
        Utility of routine urinalysis and urine culture testing in an ambulatory urology clinic: a quality improvement initiative in a Veterans healthcare facility.
        Can J Urol. 2017; 24: 8627-8633
        • Pallari E
        • Khadjesari Z
        • Biyani CS
        • et al.
        Pilot implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement taught curriculum for urology residents: lessons from the United Kingdom.
        Am J Surg. 2020; 219: 269-277https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.011
        • Haynes AB
        • Weiser TG
        • Berry WR
        • et al.
        A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 491-499https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
        • Van Leeuwen B
        • Jinfeng J
        • Deibert CM.
        Urology resident involvement in patient safety and quality improvement activities.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2020; 21: 48https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-01000-2
        • Ziemba Justin B
        • Matlaga Brian R
        • Tessier Christopher D.
        Educational resources for resident training in quality improvement: a national survey of urology residency program directors.
        Urol Pract. 2018; 5: 398-404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2017.08.001
        • Jacobs AC
        • Malhotra NR
        • Purnell SM
        • et al.
        Quality improvement education in surgical specialty training: a comparison of Vascular Surgery resident and Urology Resident experiences and attitudes.
        Am J Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.036
        • Malhotra NR
        • Lee YJ
        • Millar MM
        • Cartwright PC
        • Smith BK.
        Experiences with quality improvement in training: a national survey of urology residents.
        Urology. 2020; 145: 83-89https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.075
        • Lucas DJ
        • Pawlik TM.
        Quality improvement in gastrointestinal surgical oncology with american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.
        Surgery. 2014; 155: 593-601https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.001
        • Berman L
        • Rangel S
        • Goldin A
        • et al.
        Safety culture among pediatric surgeons: a national survey of attitudes and perceptions of patient safety.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53: 381-395https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.09.011
      1. Census Results - American Urological Association.
        2021 (Accessed June 1Available at:)
        • Vandenbroucke JP
        • von Elm E
        • Altman DG
        • et al.
        Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
        Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2007; 18: 805-835https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511
        • Downey JR
        • Hernandez-Boussard T
        • Banka G
        • Morton JM.
        Is patient safety improving? national trends in patient safety indicators: 1998–2007.
        Health Serv Res. 2012; 47: 414-430https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01361.x
        • Wang Y
        • Eldridge N
        • Metersky ML
        • et al.
        National trends in patient safety for four common conditions, 2005–2011.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 341-351https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1300991
        • Mahoney ST
        • Irish W
        • Strassle PD
        • et al.
        Practice characteristics and job satisfaction of private practice and academic surgeons.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5670
        • Breyer BN
        • Fang R
        • Meeks W
        • Lightner D
        • Clemens JQ.
        Use of the american urological association clinical practice guidelines: data from the AUA census.
        Urol Pract. 2017; 4: 462-467https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2016.10.003
        • Dahrouge S
        • Armstrong CD
        • Hogg W
        • Singh J
        • Liddy C.
        High-performing physicians are more likely to participate in a research study: findings from a quality improvement study.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19: 171https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0809-6
        • Lane GI
        • Ellimoottil C
        • Wallner L
        • Meeks W
        • Mbassa R
        • Clemens JQ.
        Shared decision-making in urologic practice: results from the 2019 AUA census.
        Urology. 2020; 145: 66-72https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.078
        • Washington SL
        • Baradaran N
        • Gaither TW
        • et al.
        Racial distribution of urology workforce in United States in comparison to general population.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7: 526-534https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.05.16
        • Cohen AJ
        • Agochukwu-Mmonu N
        • Makarov DV
        • et al.
        Significant management variability of urethral stricture disease in United States: data from the AUA Quality (AQUA) Registry.
        Urology. 2020; 146: 265-270https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.053
        • Shelton JB
        • Pichardo D
        • Meeks W
        • et al.
        Characteristics of participants in the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) registry and early impact of participation on quality of care.
        Urol Pract. 2021; 0https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000198