Advertisement

Workforce Diversity in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: An Analysis of the American Urological Association Census Data

  • Elodi J. Dielubanza
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Elodi J Dielubanza, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Address: 45 Francis Street Boston Massachusetts 02115.
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ekene A. Enemchukwu
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Ekene A Enemchukwu, MD, MPH, Stanford University School of Medicine, Address: 300 Pasteur Drive, 2nd Floor Grant Building, Rm S287, Stanford, California 94305
    Affiliations
    Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
    Search for articles by this author
  • Humphrey O. Atiemo
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Humphrey O Atiemo, MD, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Address: 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit Massachusetts 48202
    Affiliations
    Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
    Search for articles by this author

      ABSTRACT

      Objective

      To describe the current state of workforce diversity in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) using the 2014-2019 American Urological Association (AUA) census data.

      Materials

      We evaluated FPMRS workforce diversity using the AUA census data from 2014 to 2019. Underrepresented in medicine (URiM) groups were categorized as individuals who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black/African American, Hispanic, Multiracial, and Other. The FPMRS workforce was then compared to the overall urologic workforce and the other urologic subspecialties (oncology, pediatric urology, and endourology) and assessed by AUA section.

      Results

      In 2019, 602 urologists self-identified as FPMRS providers. Of these 12.4% (n = 74) were categorized as URiM urologists compared to 8% of the overall urologic workforce. Women who represent 9.9% of all urologists were overrepresented in FPMRS workforce (46.5%). FPMRS had the largest proportion of URiM and women urologists when compared to the other subspecialty areas.

      Conclusion

      The FPMRS urologic subspecialty has the highest percentage of women and URiM urologists compared to all other urologic subspecialty areas. Engagement initiatives and targeted programs may offer insights into this trend. Further research is required to determine the impact of such programs in attracting URiM and women to FPMRS.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wu JM
        • Vaughan CP
        • Goode PS
        • et al.
        Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123 (PMID: 24463674; PMCID: PMC3970401): 141-148https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057
        • Nygaard I
        • Barber MD
        • Burgio KL
        • et al.
        Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women.
        JAMA. 2008; 300 (PMID: 18799443; PMCID: PMC2918416): 1311-1316https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1311
      1. Fact Sheet: Aging in the United States. Population Bulletin. Population Reference Bureau Available at: https://www.prb.org/aging-unitedstates-fact-sheet/

        • LaVeist T
        • Nuru-Jeter A
        • Jones K
        The association of doctor-patient race concordance with health services utilization.
        J Public Health Pol. 2003; 24 (Available at:): 312-323
      2. Cooper-Patrick, L, Gallo, J, Gonzales, H, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282: 583–589.

        • Mandimika CL
        • Murk W
        • Mcpencow AM
        • et al.
        Racial disparities in knowledge of pelvic floor disorders among community-dwelling women.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015; 21 (PMID: 26313495; PMCID: PMC4556138): 287-292https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000182
        • Washington BB
        • Raker CA
        • Mishra K
        • Sung VW
        Variables impacting care-seeking for pelvic floor disorders among african american women.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013; 19 (PMID: 23442507): 98-102https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b013e31827bfee8
        • Siddiqui NY
        • Ammarell N
        • Wu JM
        • Sandoval JS
        • Bosworth HB
        Urinary incontinence and health-seeking behavior among white, black, and latina women.
        Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016; 22 (PMID: 27171320; PMCID: PMC5002243): 340-345https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000286
        • Shah AD
        • Kohli N
        • Rajan SS
        • Hoyte L
        Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in the united states: does race play a role?.
        Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19 (Epub 2008 Mar 29. PMID: 18373047): 1085-1092https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0580-4
        • Shah AD
        • Kohli N
        • Rajan SS
        • Hoyte L
        Racial characteristics of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the united states.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197 (PMID: 17618763): 701-708https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.042
        • Weissbart SJ
        • Zimmern PE
        • Nitti VW
        • et al.
        The history of the society of urodynamics, female pelvic medicine, and urogenital reconstruction.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37 (Epub 2018 Mar 25. PMID: 29575219): 2015-2025https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23540
      3. Society of Urodynamics Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) 2021 Visiting Professorship.
        WJ Weiser &Associates, Inc, 2021 (Viewed March 3Available at:)
        • Lett LA
        • Murdock HM
        • Orji WU
        • Aysola J
        • Sebro R
        Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2 (PMID: 31483469; PMCID: PMC6727686)e1910490https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490
        • Nieblas-Bedolla E
        • Williams JR
        • Christophers B
        • Kweon CY
        • Williams EJ
        • Jimenez N
        Trends in race/ethnicity among applicants and matriculants to US surgical specialties, 2010-2018.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3e2023509https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23509
        • Lett LA
        • Orji WU
        • Sebro R
        Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties.
        PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (PMID: 30444928; PMCID: PMC6239326)e0207274https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207274
        • Abelson JS
        • Symer MM
        • Yeo HL
        • et al.
        Surgical time out: our counts are still short on racial diversity in academic surgery.
        Am J Surg. 2018; 215 (Epub 2017 Jul 1. PMID: 28693843): 542-548https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.028
        • Fox BM
        • Adami AJ
        • Hull TD
        Reinforcing our pipeline: trainee-driven approaches to improving physician-scientist training.
        J Clin Invest. 2018; 128 (Epub 2018 Jul 16. PMID: 30010622; PMCID: PMC6063468): 3206-3208https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI122100
        • Daye D
        • Patel CB
        • Ahn J
        • Nguyen FT
        Challenges and opportunities for reinvigorating the physician-scientist pipeline.
        J Clin Invest. 2015; 125: 883-887https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI80933
        • Yehia WT
        Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: a mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds.
        BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14 (PMID 24512599): 26
        • Price EG
        • Powe NR
        • Kern DE
        • et al.
        Improving the diversity climate in academic medicine: faculty perceptions as a catalyst for institutional change.
        Acad Med. 2009; 84: 95-105
        • Fang D
        • Moy E
        • Colburn L
        • Hurley J
        Racial and ethnic disparities in faculty promotion in academic medicine.
        JAMA. 2000; 284 (PMID: 10974686): 1085-1092https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.9.1085
        • Cropsey KL
        • Masho SW
        • Shiang R
        • Sikka V
        • Kornstein SG
        • Hampton CL
        Committee on the status of women and minorities, virginia commonwealth university school of medicine, medical college of virginia campus. why do faculty leave? reasons for attrition of women and minority faculty from a medical school: 4-year results.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008; 17 (PMID: 18657042): 1111-1118https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0582