Advertisement

Understanding the Health Characteristics and Treatment Choices of Older Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence

      Abstract

      OBJECTIVE

      To describe the health characteristics and current treatment choices of male stress urinary incontinence (mSUI) patients to inform patient-centered decision-making.

      METHODS

      We identified a cohort of mSUI patients aged ≥65 at UCSF and San Francisco VA. Using retrospective chart review and telephone interviews, we ascertained demographics, incontinence characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (score ≥ 4 indicates significant morbidity), frailty with Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, functional dependence with activities of daily living (ADL), calculated life expectancy, and assessed mental health and quality of life (QOL). Bivariate analysis evaluated associations between subject characteristics and ultimate treatment type (conservative vs surgery; sling vs sphincter). Logistic multivariable models evaluating treatment choice were also constructed.

      RESULTS

      The 130 participants had a mean age of 75 and a mean incontinence score of 14.2 representing moderately bothersome incontinence. Nearly 80% had significant morbidity, three-quarters had >50% 10-year mortality risk, 10% needed help with 1 + ADL and 22% had a TUG >10 seconds indicating frailty. The mean physical and mental QOL scores were similar to the general population. Anxiety and depression were reported by 3.9% and 10%. In univariate and multivariable analysis, only incontinence characteristics were associated with conservative vs surgical treatment choice (P < .01).

      CONCLUSION

      Multi-morbidity, functional dependence, frailty, and limited life expectancy are common among older men with mSUI, yet current treatment choices appear to be driven by incontinence characteristics. As such, mSUI surgery should be considered among men across the spectrum of health and life expectancy.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Trackstar-Urologic Diseases Chap 04.pdf. Available at:https://uda-online.ctrl.ucla.edu/pdf-compendium/Sections/Trackstar-Urologic%20Diseases%20Chap%2004.pdf.Accessed 20, July, 2020

        • Bauer Scott R
        • Scherzer Rebecca
        • Suskind Anne M
        • et al.
        Co-occurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms and frailty among community-dwelling older men.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68: 2805-2813https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16766
        • Jang Il-Young
        • Lee Chang Ki
        • Jung Hee-Won
        • et al.
        Urologic symptoms and burden of frailty and geriatric conditions in older men: the Aging Study of PyeongChang Rural Area.
        Clin Interv Aging. 2018; 13: 297-304https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S158717
        • Mehta HB
        • Dimou F
        • Adhikari D
        • et al.
        Comparison of comorbidity scores in predicting surgical outcomes.
        Med Care. 2016; 54: 180-187https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000465
        • Souwer Esteban T D
        • Verweij Norbert M
        • van den Bos Frederiek
        • et al.
        Risk stratification for surgical outcomes in older colorectal cancer patients using ISAR-HP and G8 screening tools.
        J Geriatr Oncol. 2018; 9: 110-114https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2017.09.003
        • Nishijima Tomohiro F
        • Esaki Taito
        • Morita Masaru
        • Toh Yasushi
        Preoperative frailty assessment with the robinson frailty score, edmonton frail scale, and G8 and adverse postoperative outcomes in older surgical patients with cancer.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; S0748-7983: 30803-30809https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.031
        • Bruijnen Cheryl P
        • Heijmer Anne
        • Harten-Krouwel Diny G van
        • et al.
        Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with cancer considered for surgical treatment.
        J Geriatr Oncol. 2020; S1879-4068 (30489-6)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.017
        • Inouye Brian M.
        • Sexton Stephanie J.
        • Boysen William R.
        • et al.
        Increasing comorbidity and frailty is not associated with early postoperative complications among men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter or sling implantation: a real-world application of nsqip® data to reconstructive urology.
        Urology Practice. 2021; 8: 264-269https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000199
        • Scheepers Ellen R M
        • Molen Loes F van der
        • Bos Frederiek van den
        • Burgmans Josephine P
        • Huis-Tanja Lieke H van
        • Hamaker Marije E
        The G8 frailty screening tool and the decision-making process in older breast cancer patients.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021; 30: e13357https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13357
        • Zwaard Babette C van der
        • Stein Charlotte E
        • Bootsma Janet E M
        • Geffen Hendrikus J A A van
        • Douw Conny M
        • Keijsers Carolina J P W
        Fewer patients undergo surgery when adding a comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with a hip fracture.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140: 487-492https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03294-5
        • Rizvi Syed Ali Mujtaba
        • Helseth Eirik
        • Rønning Pål
        • et al.
        Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making.
        BMC Surg. 2020; 20: 236https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00893-7
        • Sourdet Sandrine
        • Brechemier Delphine
        • Steinmeyer Zara
        • Gerard Stephane
        • Balardy Laurent
        Impact of the comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decision in geriatric oncology.
        BMC Cancer. 2020; 20: 384https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06878-2
        • Perlow Haley K
        • Cassidy Vincent
        • Farnia Benjamin
        • et al.
        Impact of performance status and comorbidity on palliative radiation treatment tolerance and end-of-life decision-making.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018; 4: 127-133https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.002
        • Sandhu Jaspreet S
        • Breyer Benjamin
        • Comiter Craig
        • et al.
        Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline.
        J Urol. 2019; 202: 369-378https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000314
        • Lucas Malcolm G
        • Bosch Ruud J L
        • Burkhard Fiona C
        • et al.
        EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence.
        Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 1118-1129https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.023
        • Charlson ME
        • Pompei P
        • Ales KL
        • MacKenzie CR
        A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 373-383https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
        • Chan KS
        • Kasper JD
        • Brandt J
        • Pezzin LE
        Measurement equivalence in ADL and IADL difficulty across international surveys of aging: findings from the HRS, SHARE, and ELSA.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012; 67B: 121-132https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr133
        • Pangilinan J
        • Quanstrom K
        • Bridge M
        • Walter LC
        • Finlayson E
        • Suskind AM
        The timed up and go test as a measure of frailty in urologic practice.
        Urology. 2017; 106: 32-38https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.054
        • Cruz M
        • Covinsky K
        • Widera EW
        • Stijacic-Cenzer I
        • Lee SJ
        Predicting 10-Year Mortality for Older Adults.
        JAMA. 2013; 309: 874-876https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.1184
        • Kroenke K
        • Spitzer RL
        • Williams JBW
        • Monahan PO
        • Löwe B
        Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection.
        Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 317-325https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
        • Kroenke K
        • Spitzer RL
        • Williams JBW
        The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.
        Med Care. 2003; 41: 1284-1292https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C
        • Smyer MA
        • Hofland BF
        • Jonas EA
        Validity study of the short portable mental status questionnaire for the elderly*.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1979; 27: 263-269https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1979.tb06128.x
        • Hays RD
        • Bjorner JB
        • Revicki DA
        • Spritzer KL
        • Cella D
        Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items.
        Quality of Life Research. 2009; 18: 873-880https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9
        • Avery K
        • Donovan J
        • Peters TJ
        • Shaw C
        • Gotoh M
        • Abrams P
        ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence.
        Neurourol Urodyn. 2004; 23: 322-330https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20041
        • Alwaal A
        • Harris CR
        • Awad MA
        • Allen IE
        • Breyer BN
        Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
        Int Urol Nephrol. 2016; 48: 1571-1576https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1347-3
        • Kim S
        • Brooks AK
        • Groban L
        Preoperative assessment of the older surgical patient: honing in on geriatric syndromes.
        Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10: 13-27https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S75285
        • Min L
        • Hall K
        • Finlayson E
        • et al.
        Estimating risk of postsurgical general and geriatric complications using the VESPA preoperative tool.
        JAMA Surg. 2017; 152: 1126-1133https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2635
        • Medendorp AR
        • Anger JT
        • Jin C
        • et al.
        The impact of frailty on artificial urinary sphincter placement and removal procedures.
        Urology. 2019; 129: 210-216https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.015
        • Dunlop DD
        • Manheim LM
        • Sohn M-W
        • Liu X
        • Chang RW
        Incidence of functional limitation in older adults: The impact of gender, race, and chronic conditions.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 964-971https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32817
        • Chiarelli PE
        • Mackenzie LA
        • Osmotherly PG
        Urinary incontinence is associated with an increase in falls: a systematic review.
        Aust J Physiother. 2009; 55: 89-95https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70038-8
        • Yokoyama M
        • Masuda H
        • Ito M
        • et al.
        Longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
        Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12311
        • Bauer RM
        • Grabbert MT
        • Klehr B
        • et al.
        36-month data for the AdVance XP® male sling: results of a prospective multicentre study.
        BJU Int. 2017; 119: 626-630https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13704
        • Giammò A
        • Ammirati E
        • Tullio A
        • et al.
        Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: results of a single centre.
        Int Braz J Urol. 2019; 45: 127-136https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0171
        • Abdullah A
        • Machkour F
        • Bouchet E
        • Plainard X
        • Descazeaud A
        Efficacy of the VIRTUE male quadratic sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A retrospective study.
        Prog Urol. 2019; 29: 490-495https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2019.07.004