Advertisement

EDITORIAL COMMENT

      We would like to thank the editors for their comment on “Preventing prostate biopsy complications: to Augment or to Swab”. They present some of the challenges to implementing a rectal swab prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy, and offer an alternative using the transperineal (TP) biopsy approach.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Liu W
        • Patil D
        • Howard DH
        • et al.
        Adoption of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging for men undergoing prostate biopsy in the United States.
        Urol. 2018; 117: 57-63
        • Roberts MJ
        • Macdonald A
        • Ranasinghe S
        • et al.
        Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.
        Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021; 24: 169-176
        • Skouteris VM
        • Crawford ED
        • Mouraviev V
        • et al.
        Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Versus Transperineal Mapping Prostate Biopsy: Complication Comparison.
        Rev Urol. 2018; 20: 19-25
        • Guo LH
        • Wu R
        • Xu HX
        • et al.
        Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Trial.
        Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 16089