Advertisement

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Should Be Preferred Over Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Local Staging and Disease Risk Classification

Published:October 28, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.089

      Objective

      To assess the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) local tumor staging on prostate cancer risk stratification and choice of treatment.

      Materials and Methods

      Prostate cancer patients, newly diagnosed from 2017 to 2018 at 7 Dutch teaching hospitals were included. Risk group classification was done twice, using either digital rectal examination (DRE) or mp-MRI information. Risk group migration and rates of treatment intensification associated with mp-MRI upstaging were established. Diagnostic accuracy measures for the detection of nonorgan-confined disease (stage ≥T3a), for both DRE and mp-MRI, were assessed in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

      Results

      A total of 1683 patients were included. Upstaging due to mp-MRI staging occurred in 493 of 1683 (29%) patients and downstaging in 43 of 1683 (3%) patients. Upstaging was associated with significant higher odds for treatment intensification (odds ratio [OR]: 3.5 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.5). Stage ≥T3a on mp-MRI was the most common reason for risk group upstaging (77%). Sensitivity for the detection of stage ≥T3a was higher for mp-MRI compared to DRE (51% vs 12%, P <.001), whereas specificity was lower (82% vs 97%, P <.001). Mp-MRI resulted in a significantly higher cumulative rate of true positive and true negative stage ≥T3a predictions compared with DRE (67% vs 58%, P <.001).

      Conclusion

      Use of mp-MRI tumor stage for prostate cancer risk classification leads to upstaging in 1 of 3 patients. Mp-MRI enables superior detection of nonorgan-confined disease compared with DRE, and should be the preferred tool for determining clinical tumor stage.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • D'Amico AV
        • Whittinton R
        • Malkowicz B
        • et al.
        Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 969-974
        • Mohler JL
        • Armstrong AJ
        • Bahnson RR
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer, version 1.2016.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016; 14: 19-30
        • Mottet N
        • Bellmunt J
        • Bolla M
        • et al.
        EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent.
        Eur Urol. 2017; 71: 618-629
        • Ahmed HU
        • El-Shater Bosaily A
        • Brown LC
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 815-822
        • van der Leest M
        • Cornel E
        • Israel B
        • et al.
        Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naive men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study.
        Eur Urol. 2018; 75: 570-578
        • Marenco J
        • Orczyk C
        • Collins T
        • Moore C
        • Emberton M
        Role of MRI in planning radical prostatectomy: what is the added value?.
        World J Urol. 2019; 37: 1289-1292
        • Boesen L
        • Chabanova E
        • Logager V
        • Balslev I
        • Mikines K
        • Thomsen HS
        Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multiparametric MRI: a correlation with histopathology.
        Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 1776-1785
        • Caglic I
        • Kovac V
        • Barrett T
        Multiparametric MRI - local staging of prostate cancer and beyond.
        Radiol Oncol. 2019; 53: 159-170
        • de Rooij M
        • Hamoen EH
        • Witjes JA
        • Barentsz JO
        • Rovers MM
        Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2016; 70: 233-245
        • Paner GP
        • Stadler WM
        • Hansel DE
        • Montironi R
        • Lin DW
        • Amin MB
        Updates in the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis staging classification for urologic cancers.
        Eur Urol. 2018; 73: 560-569
        • Draulans C
        • Everaerts W
        • Isebaert S
        • et al.
        Impact of magnetic resonance imaging on prostate cancer staging and European Association of urology risk classification.
        Urology. 2019; 130: 113-119
        • Marcus DM
        • Rossi PJ
        • Nour SG
        • Jani AB
        The impact of multiparametric pelvic magnetic resonance imaging on risk stratification in patients with localized prostate cancer.
        Urology. 2014; 84: 132-137
        • Epstein JI
        • Egevad L
        • Amin MB
        • et al.
        The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; 40: 244-252
        • Weinreb JC
        • Barentsz JO
        • Choyke PL
        • et al.
        PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2.
        Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 16-40
        • Fine SW
        • Amin MB
        • Berney DM
        • et al.
        A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
        Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 20-39
        • Feinstein AR
        • Sosin DM
        • Wells CK
        The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 1604-1608
        • Anderson BB
        • Oberlin DT
        • Razmaria AA
        • et al.
        Extraprostatic extension is extremely rare for contemporary gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 455-460
        • Gandaglia G
        • Ploussard G
        • Valerio M
        • Mattei A
        • Fiori C
        • Roumiguie M
        • et al.
        The key combined value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and concomitant systematic biopsies for the prediction of adverse pathological features in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
        Eur Urol. 2019; (Online ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.005
        • Martini A
        • Gupta A
        • Lewis SC
        • et al.
        Development and internal validation of a side-specific, multiparametric mag-netic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
        BJU Int. 2018; 122: 1025-1033
        • Nyarangi-Dix J
        • Wiesenfarth M
        • Bonekamp D
        • et al.
        Combined clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of extraprostatic disease-A risk model for patient-tailored risk stratification when planning radical prostatectomy.
        Eur Urol Focus. 2018; (Online ahead of print)
        • Ball MW
        • Partin AW
        • Epstein JI
        Extent of extraprostatic extension independently influences biochemical recurrence-free survival: evidence for further pT3 subclassification.
        Urology. 2015; 85: 161-164
        • Jeong BC
        • Chalfin HJ
        • Lee SB
        • et al.
        The relationship between the extent of extraprostatic extension and survival following radical prostatectomy.
        Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 342-346
        • Ploussard G
        • Beauval JB
        • Lesourd M
        • et al.
        Added value of concomitant systematic biopsies for grade group prediction based on radical prostatectomy final pathology in magnetic resonance imaging positive cases undergoing fusion targeted biopsies.
        J Urol. 2019; 202: 1182-1187