Advertisement

The Positive Effect of Monetary Incentive on Urology Resident Research

Published:September 21, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.077

      Objective

      To evaluate whether a financial incentive changed research patterns among residents over a 12-year period.

      Methods

      At our institution, beginning July 2016, any resident work that led to a PubMed citation was awarded $1,000. A review of the PubMed database and the regional meeting of the South Central Section of AUA (SCS/AUA) presentation itineraries were used to quantify and qualify the participation in research by these residents before and after introduction of the financial incentive.

      Results

      Scholarly activity from thirty out of thirty possible residents was evaluated. The monetary incentive resulted in increased production post-incentive (6.33) vs pre-incentive (2.44) in average total authorship participation published to PubMed per year (P = .0125). The average number of PubMed primary authorships per resident per year increased from 0 in July 2007-June 2008 to 0.7 in July 2018-June 2019, displaying upward trajectory. Average primary authorship of research produced per year presented at SCS/AUA and published to PubMed increased postincentive (9.00) vs pre-incentive (4.89) (P = .0479). More review articles and less basic science research were published after the incentive.

      Conclusion

      Offering financial incentives to urology residents increased publications and meaningful participation in research.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Canadian Plastic Surgery Research Collaborative (CPSRC). Barriers and attitudes to research among residents in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a national multicenter cross-sectional study.
        J Surg Educ. 2017; 74: 1094-1104
        • Noble C
        • Billett SR
        • Phang DTY
        • Sharma S
        • Hashem F
        • Rogers GD
        Supporting resident research learning in the workplace: a rapid realist review.
        Acad Med. 2018; 93: 1732-1740
        • Ahn J
        • Donegan DJ
        • Lawrence JT
        • Halpern SD
        • Mehta S
        The future of the orthopaedic clinician-scientist: part II: Identification of factors that may influence orthopaedic residents' intent to perform research.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 1041-1046
        • Hames K
        • Patlas M
        • Duszak R
        Barriers to resident research in radiology: a Canadian perspective.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018; 69: 260-265
        • Chang CW
        • Mills JC
        Effects of a reward system on resident research productivity.
        JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 139: 1285-1290https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5303
        • Alweis R
        • Wenderoth S
        • Donato A
        Effectiveness of iterative interventions to increase research productivity in one residency program.
        J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015; 5 (Published 2015 Dec 11): 29203https://doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v5.29203
        • Tien-estrada J
        • Vieira A
        • Percy V
        • et al.
        Determinants of scholarly project completion in a paediatric resident program in Canada.
        Paediatr Child Health. 2019; 24: e98-e103