Advertisement
Ambulatory and Office Urology| Volume 146, P19-24, December 2020

Download started.

Ok

Malpractice Litigation in Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury: a Legal Database Review

Published:September 08, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.049

      Objective

      To examine the factors associated with iatrogenic ureteral injury litigation and outcomes.

      Methods

      The Westlaw legal database was queried for all iatrogenic ureteral injury cases. Variables extracted included available clinical factors, method of settlement, and litigation outcomes. Linear regression analysis was conducted to examine factors associated with award amount.

      Results

      A total of 522 cases from 1961 to 2019 were included in the study. The most common specialty named was gynecology (353/512, 68.9%), followed by urology (89/512, 17.4%). The most common claim was intraoperative negligence (474/522 cases, 90.8%). Fifty two cases were settled or arbitrated and 470 went to trial. Settlement or arbitration was more likely in cases involving institution-only defendant (15.4% vs 7.3%, P< .01), academic institution (19.7% vs 7.1%, P < .01), and patient death (42.9% vs 10.7%; P < .001). Of cases that went to trial, the verdict favored the defendant in 339/470 cases (72.1%). The median award was $552,822.96 (interquartile range 187,007-1,063,603). Duration of temporary drainage ($5050/day, P = .02), delayed repair (P = .03), claim of inadequate workup (P = .03), and claim of failure to supervise trainee (P < .001) were significantly associated with increasing award amount.

      Conclusion

      The majority of ureteral injury litigation ruled in favor of the defendant. However, when awarded, the amount was substantial and correlated with drainage duration, delayed repair, claim of inadequate workup, and failure to supervise trainee. These findings highlight factors perceived to be associated with significant distress and reflect trends in medicolegal decision-making.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ozdemir E
        • Ozturk U
        • Celen S
        • et al.
        Urinary complications of gynecologic surgery: iatrogenic urinary tract system injuries in obstetrics and gynecology operations.
        Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38: 217-220
        • Vakili B
        • Chesson RR
        • Kyle BL
        • et al.
        The incidence of urinary tract injury during hysterectomy: a prospective analysis based on universal cystoscopy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1599-1604
        • Halabi WJ
        • Jafari MD
        • Nguyen VQ
        • et al.
        Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery: an analysis of trends, outcomes, and risk factors over a 10-year period in the United States.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57: 179-186
        • Eswara JR
        • Raup VT
        • Potretzke AM
        • Hunt SR
        • Brandes SB
        Outcomes of iatrogenic genitourinary injuries during colorectal surgery.
        Urology. 2015; 86: 1228-1233
        • Burks FN
        • Santucci RA.
        Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury.
        Ther Adv Urol. 2014; 6: 115-124
        • Merola J
        • Arnold B
        • Luks V
        • et al.
        Prophylactic ureteral stent placement vs no ureteral stent placement during open colectomy.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 87-90
        • Douissard J
        • Meyer J
        • Ris F
        • Liot E
        • Morel P
        • Buchs NC
        Iatrogenic ureteral injuries and their prevention in colorectal surgery: results from a nationwide survey.
        Colorectal Dis. 2019; 21: 595-602
        • Sandberg EM
        • Bordewijk EM
        • Klemann D
        • Driessen SRC
        • Twijnstra ARH
        • Jansen FW
        Medical malpractice claims in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a Dutch overview of 20 years.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 5418-5426
        • Gilmour DT
        • Baskett TF.
        Disability and litigation from urinary tract injuries at benign gynecologic surgery in Canada.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 109-114
        • Rynecki ND
        • Coban D
        • Gantz O
        • et al.
        Medical malpractice in orthopedic surgery: a Westlaw-based demographic analysis.
        Orthopedics. 2018; 41: e615-e620
        • Blazek AJ
        • Belle JD
        • Deibert MP
        • Deibert CM
        Legal review of vasectomy litigation and the variables impacting trial outcomes.
        Urology. 2019; 131: 120-124
        • Thomas R
        • Gupta R
        • Griessenauer CJ
        • et al.
        Medical malpractice in neurosurgery: a comprehensive analysis.
        World Neurosurg. 2018; 110: e552-e559
        • Engelhard SB
        • Collins M
        • Shah C
        • Sim AJ
        • Reddy AK
        Malpractice litigation in pediatric ophthalmology.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016; 134: 1230-1235
        • Bal BS.
        An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 339-347
        • Selzman AA
        • Spirnak JP
        Iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a 20-year experience in treating 165 injuries.
        J Urol. 1996; 155: 878-881
        • Packiam VT
        • Cohen AJ
        • Pariser JJ
        • Nottingham CU
        • Faris SF
        • Bales GT
        The impact of minimally invasive surgery on major iatrogenic ureteral injury and subsequent ureteral repair during hysterectomy: a national analysis of risk factors and outcomes.
        Urology. 2016; 98: 183-188
        • Vilos G
        • Dow D
        • Allen H
        Litigation following ureteral injuries associated with gynaecological surgery.
        Journal SOGC. 1999; 21: 31-45
        • Peters P.
        Doctors & juries.
        Michigan Law Review. 2007; 105: 1453-1495
        • Osman NI
        • Collins GN.
        Urological litigation in the UK National Health Service (NHS): an analysis of 14 years of successful claims.
        BJU Int. 2011; 108: 162-165
        • Kim E
        • Wu H
        • Simpson K
        • Patzkowsky K
        • Wang K
        Litigations involving ureteral injury related to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: lessons learned from a legal literature review.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26: 608-617
      1. Hartwig R. Medical Malpractice Insurance Jury Verdict Research: Insurance Information Institute. Volume 1. 2008, New York, NY, USA

        • Shepherd J.
        Uncovering the silent victims of the American medical liability system.
        Vanderbilt Law Review. 2014; 67: 151-196
        • Joshi HB
        • Okeke A
        • Newns N
        • Keeley Jr., FX
        • Timoney AG
        Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents.
        Urology. 2002; 59: 511-516
        • Thiels CA
        • Choudhry AJ
        • Ray-Zack MD
        • et al.
        Medical malpractice lawsuits involving surgical residents.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 8-13
        • Sohn DH
        • Bal BS
        Medical malpractice reform: the role of alternative dispute resolution.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 1370-1378
        • Szmania S
        • Johnson A
        • Mulligan M
        Alternative dispute resolution in medical malpractice: a survey of emerging trends and practices.
        Conflict Resolution Q. 2008; 26: 71-96
        • Hsieh MH
        • Tan AG
        • Meng MV
        Medical malpractice in American urology: 22-year national review of the impact of caps and implications for contemporary practice.
        J Urol. 2008; 179 (discussion 1949): 1944-1949
        • Baker SR
        • Whang JS
        • Luk L
        • Clarkin KS
        • Castro 3rd, A
        • Patel R
        The demography of medical malpractice suits against radiologists.
        Radiology. 2013; 266: 539-547
        • Canady MR.
        The verdict is in: surviving a medical malpractice trial.
        Physician Leadersh J. 2016; 3: 14-17