Advertisement

The Impact of Hospital Volume on Short-term and Long-term Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Published:September 03, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.062

      OBJECTIVES

      To examine the effect of hospital volume on short and long-term outcomes for radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx). Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is a rare malignancy that few surgeons have experience with. The hospital volume-outcome relationship has been well established for other cancers but not RNUx.

      METHODS

      The National Cancer Database was queried for all cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma that underwent RNUx from 2004 to 2016. Average annual hospital volume for radical nephroureterectomy was stratified into tertiles. The upper tertile, defined as 6 or more RNUx per year, was considered high volume while low volume was less than 6 RNUx per year. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify independent predictors of overall survival, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of perioperative outcomes.

      RESULTS

      We identified 37,479 RNUx performed across 1290 hospitals. There were no differences in baseline health or cancer staging between patients who presented at low- versus high-volume centers. Both peri-operative survival (30- and 90-day mortality) and long-term overall survival were improved in patients treated at high-volume centers. On multivariable survival analysis, treatment at a high-volume center was associated with improved hazards of survival. This relationship for long-term survival remained consistent on landmark analysis where patients who died within 90 days of surgery were removed.

      CONCLUSIONS

      Treatment at a high-volume hospital was associated not only with improved short-term perioperative outcomes but also with improved overall long-term survival. The mechanism behind this is likely multifactorial with surgeon volume, and ancillary support services all playing critical roles.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rouprêt M
        • Babjuk M
        • Compérat E
        • et al.
        European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update.
        Eur Urol. 2018; 73: 111-122
        • Capolicchio JP
        • Saemi A
        • Trotter S
        • Plante MK
        Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with a modified hand-assisted approach.
        Urology. 2011; 77: 607-611
        • Birkmeyer JD
        • Stukel TA
        • Siewers AE
        • Goodney PP
        • Wennberg DE
        • Lucas FL
        Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2117-2127
        • Begg CB
        • Cramer LD
        • Hoskins WJ
        • Brennan MF
        Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 1747-1751
        • Wright JD
        • Huang Y
        • Ananth CV
        • et al.
        Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 139: 506-512
        • Greenup RA
        • Obeng-Gyasi S
        • Thomas S
        • et al.
        The effect of hospital volume on breast cancer mortality.
        Ann Surg. 2018; 267: 375-381
        • Chapman BC
        • Paniccia A
        • Hosokawa PW
        • et al.
        Impact of facility type and surgical volume on 10-year survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224: 362-372
        • Joshi SS
        • Handorf EA
        • Zibelman M
        • et al.
        Treatment facility volume and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a registry-based analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2018; 74: 387-393
        • Becker A
        • Bianchi M
        • Hansen J
        • et al.
        Benefit in regionalization of care for patients treated with nephrectomy: a nationwide inpatient sample.
        World J Urol. 2014; 32: 1511-1521
        • Sun M
        • Bianchi M
        • Trinh QD
        • et al.
        Hospital volume is a determinant of postoperative complications, blood transfusion and length of stay after radical or partial nephrectomy.
        J Urol. 2012; 187: 405-410
        • Cole AP
        • Sun M
        • Lipsitz SR
        • Sood A
        • Kibel AS
        • Trinh QD
        Reassessing the value of high-volume cancer care in the era of precision medicine.
        Cancer. 2018; 124: 1319-1321
        • Tae BS
        • Ku JH
        • Kwak C
        • Kim HH
        • Jeong CW
        Comparison of renal function after radical surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma versus renal cell carcinoma: propensity score matching.
        Urol Int. 2018; 101: 400-408
        • Lane BR
        • Smith AK
        • Larson BT
        • et al.
        Chronic kidney disease after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and implications for the administration of perioperative chemotherapy.
        Cancer. 2010; 116: 2967-2973
        • Winchester DP
        • Stewart AK
        • Phillips JL
        • Ward EE
        The national cancer data base: past, present, and future.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 4-7
      1. American College of Surgeons. The national cancer database 2013 PUF data dictionary. Available at: http://ncdbpuf.facs.org/?q=print-pdf-all. Accessed January 01, 2016.

      2. Surgery of the Primary Site Codes. Available at: http://ncdbpuf.facs.org/content/surgery-primary-site-codes. Accessed January 01, 2016.

        • Udovicich C
        • Perera M
        • Huq M
        • Wong L-M
        • Lenaghan D
        Hospital volume and perioperative outcomes for radical cystectomy: a population study.
        BJU Int. 2017; 119: 26-32
        • Waingankar N
        • Mallin K
        • Smaldone M
        • et al.
        Assessing the relative influence of hospital and surgeon volume on short-term mortality after radical cystectomy.
        BJU Int. 2017; 120: 239-245
        • Capitanio U
        • Shariat SF
        • Isbarn H
        • et al.
        Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.
        Eur Urol. 2009; 56: 1-9
        • Ni S
        • Tao W
        • Chen Q
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
        Eur Urol. 2012; 61: 1142-1153
        • Tinay I
        • Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F
        • Leow JJ
        • et al.
        Trends in utilisation, perioperative outcomes, and costs of nephroureterectomies in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a 10-year population-based analysis.
        BJU Int. 2016; 117: 954-960
        • Milstein A
        • Galvin RS
        • Delbanco SF
        • Salber P
        • Buck Jr, CR
        Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative.
        Eff Clin Pract. 2000; 3: 313-316
        • Birkmeyer JD
        • Finlayson EVA
        • Birkmeyer CM
        Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.
        Surgery. 2001; 130: 415-422
        • Lughezzani G
        • Jeldres C
        • Isbarn H
        • et al.
        A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
        Urology. 2010; 75: 118-124
        • Roscigno M
        • Shariat SF
        • Margulis V
        • et al.
        Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer specific survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.
        J Urol. 2009; 181: 2482-2489
        • Go RS
        • Bartley AC
        • Crowson CS
        • et al.
        Association between treatment facility volume and mortality of patients with multiple myeloma.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 598-604
        • Huo J
        • Lairson DR
        • Du XL
        • et al.
        Hospital case volume is associated with improved survival for patients with metastatic melanoma.
        Am J Clin Oncol. 2016; 39: 491-496
        • Goyal G
        • Kommalapati A
        • Bartley AC
        • Gunderson TM
        • Adjei AA
        • Go RS
        Association between hospital volume and mortality of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
        Lung Cancer. 2018; 122: 214-219
        • Urbach DR
        • Baxter NN
        Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data.
        BMJ. 2004; 328: 737-740
        • Boffa DJ
        • Rosen JE
        • Mallin K
        • et al.
        Using the national cancer database for outcomes research: a review.
        JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 1722-1728