Modified Circumcision Using the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial



      To evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes and complications of the modified circumcision using disposable circumcision suture device (device group) and the conventional dorsal slit circumcision (conventional group) in children.


      A total of 284 patients were randomized to either device group or conventional group. All patients were preoperatively assessed and evaluated at 4 weeks after surgery. The perioperative data and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.


      No statistical differences were observed in the average age and indications between the 2 groups preoperatively (P > .05). Compared with the conventional group, patients in the device group were shorter mean operative time, less blood loss, lower intraoperative and postoperative pain score, faster incision healing time and a higher satisfaction rate of penile cosmetic appearance (P < .01). Similarly, the incidences of complication were significantly lower in the device group than in the conventional group (4.3% vs 12.3%, P < .05).


      The modified circumcision using disposable circumcision suture device is a simple, safe, faster, and effective procedure and may become the attractive alternative to the conventional technique for the children, with a relatively lower complication rate and better cosmetic results. With the improvement of disposable circumcision suture device, the modified circumcision using disposable circumcision suture device has the potential to be widely used in the world.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Xu Y
        • Li F
        • Li Z
        • et al.
        A prospective, randomized controlled trial of circumcision in adult males using the CO2 laser: modified technique compared with the conventional dorsal-slit technique.
        Photomed Laser Surg. 2013; 31: 422-427
        • Daling JR
        • Madeleine MM
        • Johnson LG
        • et al.
        Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease.
        Int J Cancer. 2005; 116: 606-616
        • Bailey RC
        • Moses S
        • Parker CB
        • et al.
        Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 643-656
        • Gray RH
        • Kigozi G
        • Serwadda D
        • et al.
        Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 657-666
        • Craig JC
        • Knight JF
        • Sureshkumar P
        • et al.
        Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys.
        J Pediatr. 1996; 128: 23-27
        • Castellsagué X
        • Bosch FX
        • Muñoz N
        • et al.
        Male circumcision, penile human papillomavirus infection, and cervical cancer in female partners.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1105-1112
        • Hayashi Y
        • Kohri K
        Circumcision related to urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, human immunodeficiency virus infections, and penile and cervical cancer.
        Int J Urol. 2013; 20: 769-775
        • Brito MO
        • Khosla S
        • Pananookooln S
        • et al.
        Sexual pleasure and function, coital trauma, and sex behaviors after voluntary medical male circumcision among men in the Dominican Republic.
        J Sex Med. 2017; 14: 526-534
        • Huang C
        • Song P
        • Xu C
        • et al.
        Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: a network meta-analysis.
        Int J Surg. 2017; 43: 17-25
        • Cao D
        • Liu L
        • Hu Y
        • et al.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.
        Urology. 2015; 85: 799-804
        • Williams N
        • Kapila L.
        Complications of circumcision.
        Br J Surg. 1993; 80: 1231-1236
        • Yuan Y
        • Zhang Z
        • Cui W
        • et al.
        Clinical investigation of a novel surgical device for circumcision.
        J Urol. 2014; 191: 1411-1415
        • Lv BD
        • Zhang SG
        • Zhu XW
        • et al.
        Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction.
        Asian J Androl. 2014; 16: 453-456
        • Zhang Z
        • Yang B
        • Yu W
        • et al.
        Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
        Int Urol Nephrol. 2016; 48: 465-473
        • Jin XD
        • Lu JJ
        • Liu WH
        • et al.
        Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: aprospective randomized clinical trial.
        Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015; 48: 577-582
        • Han H
        • Xie DW
        • Zhou XG
        • et al.
        Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.
        Int Braz J Urol. 2017; 43: 736-745
        • Wang J
        • Zhou Y
        • Xia S
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of a novel disposable circumcision device: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial at 2 centers.
        Med Sci Monit. 2014; 20: 454-462
        • Huo ZC
        • Liu G
        • Li XY
        • et al.
        Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Asian J Androl. 2017; 19: 362-367
        • Fan Y
        • Cao D
        • Wei Q
        • et al.
        The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis.
        Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 25514
        • Li YL
        • Tu XA
        • Li QX
        • et al.
        The clinical application and curative effect the inverted "V" shape gap pad ring applied to circumcision anastomat.
        Zhongguo Nan Ke Xue. 2016; 30 (Chinese): 33-36
        • Han YF
        • Jiang HS
        • et al.
        Surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device for the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce.
        Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2018; 24 (Chinese): 404-408
        • Rao JM
        • Yang JR
        • Ren YX
        • et al.
        Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia >80 mL: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.
        Urology. 2013; 82: 176-181
        • Pan F
        • Pan L
        • Zhang A
        • et al.
        Circumcision with a novel disposable device in Chinese children: a randomized controlled trial.
        Int J Urol. 2013; 20: 220-226
        • Decastro B
        • Gurski J
        • Peterson A
        Adult template circumcision: a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device.
        Urology. 2010; 76: 810-814
        • Wu X
        • Wang Y
        • Zheng J
        • et al.
        A report of 918 cases of circumcision with the Shang Ring: comparison between children and adults.
        Urology. 2013; 81: 1058-1063
        • Awori QD
        • Lee RK
        • Li PS
        • et al.
        Use of the ShangRing circumcision device in boys below 18 years old in Kenya: results from a pilot study.
        J Int AIDS Soc. 2017; 20: 21588
        • Wang H
        • Chen N
        • Huo R
        • et al.
        Evaluation of clinical curative effects of disposable stitching instrument in redundant prepuce patients.
        Exp Ther Med. 2017; 14: 298-302