Development and Validation of A Male Anterior Urethral Stricture Classification System


      To develop and validate a clinical classification system for urethral stricture disease (USD) based on the retrograde urethrogram (RUG), physical exam, and stricture-specific patient history.


      Three elements were chosen to be included in the classification system: 1) Length of urethral stricture (L); 2) Stricture segment/location (S); 3) Stricture Etiology (E) (LSE classification system). Each element was divided into clinically relevant sub-categories. A three-step development and validation process then ensued, culminating in an in-person Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons (TURNS) meeting, at which the final classification system was unanimously agreed upon by attendees based on interrater reliability data obtained from the classifying of 22 clinical vignettes. A final validation step involved retrospectively classifying cases in the TURNS database to determine if classification influenced surgical technique and was associated with presumed stricture etiology.


      The final LSE classification system was found to have an interrater reliability of 0.79 (individual components 0.76, 0.70 and 0.93 respectfully). Retrospective classification of the 2162 TURNS strictures revealed the segment (S) to be strongly associated with urethroplasty type (p = 0.0005) and stricture etiology (E) (p = 0.0005).


      We developed and validated a novel, easy to use, urethral stricture classification system. The system's ability to aid in directing treatments, predict treatment outcomes, and facilitate collaborative research efforts will require further study.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Breyer BN
        • McAninch JW
        • Whitson JM
        • et al.
        Multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term urethroplasty outcome.
        J Urol. 2010; 183: 613-617
        • Mangera A
        • Chapple C.
        Management of anterior urethral stricture: an evidence-based approach.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2010; 20: 453-458
        • Barbagli G
        • Montorsi F
        • Balo S
        • et al.
        Treatments of 1242 bulbar urethral strictures: multivariable statistical analysis of results.
        World J Urol. 2019; 37: 1165-1171
        • Barbagli G
        • Palminteri E
        • Lazzeri M
        • Guazzoni G
        • Turini D
        Long-term outcome of urethroplasty after failed urethrotomy versus primary repair.
        J Urol. 2001; 165: 1918-1919
        • Sinha RJ
        • Singh V
        • Sankhwar SN
        • Dalela D
        Donor site morbidity in oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: implications of tobacco consumption.
        BMC Urol. 2009; 9: 15
        • Breyer BN
        • McAninch JW
        • Whitson JM
        • et al.
        Effect of obesity on urethroplasty outcome.
        Urology. 2009; 73: 1352-1355
        • Erickson BA
        • Breyer BN
        • McAninch JW
        The use of uroflowmetry to diagnose recurrent stricture after urethral reconstructive surgery.
        J Urol. 2010; 184: 1386-1390
        • Meeks JJ
        • Erickson BA
        • Granieri MA
        • Gonzalez CM
        Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review.
        J Urol. 2009; 182: 1266-1270
        • Hagedorn JC
        • Voelzke BB.
        Patient selection for urethroplasty technique: excision and primary reanastomosis versus graft.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2017; 44: 27-37
        • Carney KJ
        • McAninch JW
        Penile circular fasciocutaneous flaps to reconstruct complex anterior urethral strictures.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2002; 29: 397-409
        • Jezior JR
        • Schlossberg SM.
        Excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral stricture.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2002; 29 (vii): 373-380
        • Heinke T
        • Gerharz EW
        • Bonfig R
        • Riedmiller H
        Ventral onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for complex stricture repair.
        Urology. 2003; 61: 1004-1007
        • Iselin CE
        • Webster GD.
        Dorsal onlay urethroplasty for urethral stricture repair.
        World J Urol. 1998; 16: 181-185
        • Broadwin M
        • Vanni AJ.
        Outcomes of a urethroplasty algorithm for fossa navicularis strictures.
        Can J Urol. 2018; 25: 9591-9595
        • Kulkarni S
        • Barbagli G
        • Sansalone S
        • Lazzeri M
        One-sided anterior urethroplasty: a new dorsal onlay graft technique.
        BJU Int. 2009; 104: 1150-1155
        • Mundy AR
        • Andrich DE
        Urethral strictures.
        BJU international. 2011; 107: 6-26
        • Cotter KJ
        • Hahn AE
        • Voelzke BB
        • et al.
        Trends in urethral stricture disease etiology and urethroplasty technique from a multi-institutional surgical outcomes research group.
        Urology. 2019; 130: 167-174
        • Chen ML
        • Correa AF
        • Santucci RA
        Urethral strictures and stenoses caused by prostate therapy.
        Rev Urol. 2016; 18: 90-102
        • Blaschko SD
        • McAninch JW
        • Myers JB
        • Schlomer BJ
        • Breyer BN
        Repeat urethroplasty after failed urethral reconstruction: outcome analysis of 130 patients.
        J Urol. 2012; 188: 2260-2264
        • Awad MA
        • Gaither TW
        • Osterberg EC
        • Murphy GP
        • Baradaran N
        • Breyer BN
        Prostate cancer radiation and urethral strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018; 21: 168-174
        • Singh M
        • Blandy JP.
        The pathology of urethral stricture.
        J Urol. 1976; 115: 673-676
        • Kirkcaldy RD
        • Hook EW
        • 3rd Soge OO
        • et al.
        Trends in neisseria gonorrhoeae susceptibility to cephalosporins in the United States, 2006-2014.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1869-1871
        • Scherz HC
        • Kaplan GW
        • Packer MG
        • Brock WA
        Post-hypospadias repair urethral strictures: a review of 30 cases.
        J Urol. 1988; 140: 1253-1255
        • Langston JP
        • Robson CH
        • Rice KR
        • Evans LA
        • Morey AF
        Synchronous urethral stricture reconstruction via 1-stage ascending approach: rationale and results.
        J Urol. 2009; 181: 2161-2165
        • Wiegand LR
        • Brandes SB.
        The UREThRAL stricture score: a novel method for describing anterior urethral strictures.
        Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada. 2012; 6: 260-264
        • Eswara JR
        • Han J
        • Raup VT
        • et al.
        Refinement and validation of the urethral stricture score in categorizing anterior urethral stricture complexity.
        Urology. 2015; 85: 474-477
        • Alwaal A
        • Sanford TH
        • Harris CR
        • Osterberg EC
        • McAninch JW
        • Breyer BN
        Urethral stricture score is associated with anterior urethroplasty complexity and outcome.
        J Urol. 2016; 195: 1817-1821
        • Kutikov A
        • Uzzo RG.
        The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.
        J Urol. 2009; 182: 844-853
        • Denoix P
        Enquete permanent dans les centres anticancereaux.
        Bull Inst Nat Hyg. 1946; 1: 5
        • Erickson BA
        • Elliott SP
        • Myers JB
        • et al.
        Understanding the relationship between chronic systemic disease and lichen sclerosus urethral strictures.
        J Urol. 2016; 195: 363-368