Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016



      To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability.


      The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Year (AY) 2009-2010 to 2016-2017. Cases were stratified into the 4 ACGME categories – general urology, endourology, oncology, and reconstruction. Linear regression models analyzed the association between training year, volume, and type of cases performed. Inter-resident variability in case exposure was calculated by the difference between the ACGME reported 10th and 90th percentiles.


      During the study period, the mean number of cases performed per resident was 1092 (standard deviation 32.7). Although there was no significant change in total case volume, there were changes within case categories. Endoscopic, retroperitoneal oncology, and male reconstruction case volume all increased significantly (Δ20.1%, Δ 5.1%, Δ 8.2%, respectively, all P < .05). This was balanced with a concomitant decrease in pelvic oncology and female reconstruction cases (Δ 10.0% and Δ 14.5%, respectively, both P < .05). There was a 27.8% increase in laparoscopic/robotic cases (P < .001). The ratio difference between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile ranged from a low of 2.5 for retroperitoneal oncology cases to a high of 5.2 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.


      From AY2009-2010 to 2016-2017, residency case volume has remained constant, but there has been a change in types of cases performed and proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. Significant variability of inter-resident operative experience was noted.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Joyner BD
        An historical review of graduate medical education and a protocol of accreditation council for graduate medical education compliance.
        J Urol. 2004; 172: 34-39
        • Frank JR
        • Danoff D
        The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies.
        Med Teach. 2007; 29: 642-647
        • Ten Cate O
        Competency-based postgraduate medical education: past, present and future.
        GMS J Med Educ. 2017; 34 (Available at:): Doc69
        • Ross S
        • Hauer KE
        • Melle E van
        Outcomes are what matter: competency-based medical education gets us to our goal.
        MedEdPublish. 2018; 7: 1-5
        • Leach DC
        Changing education to improve patient care.
        Postgrad Med J. 2008; 84 (Available at:): 437-441
        • Holmboe ES
        • Edgar L
        • Conforti L
        • et al.
        Reflections on the first 2 years of milestone implementation.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2015; (Available at:): 506-512
      1. Coburn M, Amling CL, Bahnson R, et al: The Urology milestone project. 2016. Available at:, Accessed February 25, 2019

        • Maruthappu M
        • Duclos A
        • Lipsitz SR
        • et al.
        Surgical learning curves and operative efficiency: a cross-specialty observational study.
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5 (e006679–e006679. Available at:)
        Date accessed: February 25, 2019
        • Faris SF
        • Myers JB
        • Voelzke BB
        • et al.
        Assessment of the male urethral reconstruction learning curve.
        Urology. 2016; 89 (Available at:): 137-143
        Date accessed: February 25, 2019
        • Lavery HJ
        • Samadi DB
        • Thaly R
        • et al.
        The advanced learning curve in robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional survey.
        J Robot Surg. 2009; 3 (Available at:): 165-169
        Date accessed: February 25, 2019
        • Okhunov Z
        • Safiullah S
        • Patel R
        • et al.
        Evaluation of urology residency training and perceived resident abilities in the United States.
        J Surg Educ. 2019; 76: 936-948
      2. American Urological Association: Urology residents in the United States and across the globe. 2019. Available at:

        • Silvestre J
        • Hernandez JM
        • Lee DI
        Disparities in pediatric operative experience during urology residency training.
        Urology. 2019; 127 (Available at:): 24-29
        • Mazzone E
        • Mistretta FA
        • Knipper S
        • et al.
        Contemporary national assessment of robot-assisted surgery rates and total hospital charges for major surgical uro-oncological procedures in the United States.
        J Endourol. 2019; 33 (Available at:): 438-447
        • Raheem OA
        • Mirheydar HS
        • Miller DL
        • et al.
        Contemporary trends in the ambulatory surgical treatment of urolithiasis: population-based analysis.
        J Endourol. 2015; 29 (Available at:): 1189-1192
        • Blaschko SD
        • Harris CR
        • Zaid UB
        • et al.
        Trends, utilization, and immediate perioperative complications of urethroplasty in the United States: data from the National Inpatient Sample 2000-2010.
        Urology. 2015; 85: 1190-1194
        • Kearns JT
        • Holt SK
        • Wright JL
        • et al.
        PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.
        Cancer. 2018; 124 (Available at:): 2733-2739
        • Cooperberg MR
        • Mallin K
        • Kane CJ
        • et al.
        Treatment trends for stage i renal cell carcinoma.
        J Urol. 2011; 186: 394-399
        • Doolittle J
        • Piotrowski J
        • Zuk K
        • et al.
        Evolving trends for selected treatments of T1a renal cell carcinoma.
        Urology. 2019; 132: 136-142
        • Gandaglia G
        • Ravi P
        • Abdollah F
        • et al.
        Contemporary incidence and mortality rates of kidney cancer in the united states.
        J Can Urol Assoc. 2014; 8: 247-252
        • Chaudhry Z
        • Tarnay CM
        Assessing resident surgical volume before and after initiation of a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellowship.
        J Surg Educ. 2017; 74: 450-454
        • Kasten SJ
        • Prince MEP
        • Lypson ML
        Residents make their lists and program directors check them twice: reviewing case logs.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 4: 257-260
        • Dreyfus SE
        The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition.
        Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2004; 24: 177-181
        • Carraccio CL
        • Benson BJ
        • Nixon LJ
        • et al.
        From the educational bench to the clinical bedside: translating the dreyfus developmental model to the learning of clinical skills.
        Acad Med. 2008; 83: 761-767
        • Sweet RM
        • McDougall EM
        Simulation and computer-animated devices: the new minimally invasive skills training paradigm.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2008; 35 (Available at:): 519-531
        Date accessed: August 18, 2019
        • Seymour NE
        • Gallagher AG
        • Roman SA
        • et al.
        Virtual reality training improves operating room performance results of a randomized, double-blinded study.
        Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 458-464
        • Andolsek K
        • Padmore J
        • Hauer K
        • et al.
        accreditation council for graduate medical education clinical competency committees: a guidebook for programs.
        2nd Edition. 2017 (Available at:)
        • Derossis AM
        • Fried GM
        • Abrahamowicz M
        • et al.
        Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.
        Am J Surg. 1998; 175: 482-487
        • Satava RM
        • Stefanidis D
        • Levy JS
        • et al.
        Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) skills curriculum: a single-blinded, multispecialty, multi-institutional randomized control trial.
        Ann Surg. 2019; (Available at:)
        Date accessed: October 29, 2019
      3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: Common program requirements 2019.; 2018. Available at: