Advertisement

Adopting for Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Analyzing the Learning Curve of Tertiary Academic Center Urology Team

      Objectives

      To evaluate the effect of learning curve on supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) outcomes.

      Methods

      The aim of the study was to include a total of 75 patients. All of the patients were operated on by the same team, which had experience of at least 100 prone mini-PNL cases. The team was led by a surgeon who had observed 40 supine conventional PNL procedures (sheath size 24 Fr) over a period of 3 months at an endourology center with experience in supine PNL and surgeries were performed by the same primary surgeon. Patients were divided equally into 5 groups, as first 15 cases in Group 1, and final 15 in Group 5. Groups were compared according to preoperative characteristic, intraoperative result, complication rate, and success rate.

      Results

      The mean access time was 14 minutes in group 1. It decreased to mean of 10.3 minutes for cases 31 through 45, and afterward significant decrease occurred up to a mean of 6.5 minutes for cases 61 through 75 (P ≤.001). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification system, complications were assessed, and a decrease was observed from group 1 to group 5 (40%, 20%, 26.6%, 6.7%, and 13.3%, respectively). The stone free rate increased from the mean of 66.7% for the first two groups to 80% for group 3 and increase up to the 93.3% for group 4 and 5 (P = .128).

      Conclusion

      The present study showed that considering the decrease in access time and operation time 60 patients could be enough for surgical competency as well as the complications and stone-free rates reached satisfactory levels after 45 patients.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Zhao Z
        • Fan J
        • Liu Y
        • et al.
        Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position!.
        Urolithiasis. 2018; 46: 79-86
        • Wollin DA
        • Preminger GM
        Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them.
        Urolithiasis. 2018; 46: 87-97
        • Lingeman JE
        • Siegel YI
        • Steele B
        • et al.
        Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis.
        J Urol. 1994; 151: 663-667
        • Lahme S
        Miniaturisation of PCNL.
        Urolithiasis. 2018; 46: 99-106
        • Lahme S
        • Bichler KH
        • Strohmaier WL
        • et al.
        Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones.
        Eur Urol. 2001; 40: 619-624
        • Cracco CM
        • Scoffone CM
        ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery?.
        World J Urol. 2011; 29: 821-827
        • Artibani W
        • Novara G
        “Cancer-related outcome and learning curve inretropubic radical prostatectomy: ‘if you need an operation, the most important step is to choose the right surgeon’”.
        Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 874-876
        • Ziaee SA
        • Sichani MM
        • Kashi AH
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
        Urol J. 2010; 7: 226-231
        • Tanriverdi O
        • Boylu U
        • Kendirci M
        • et al.
        The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
        Eur Urol. 2007; 52: 206-211
        • Dindo D
        • Demartines N
        • Clavien PA
        Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205-213
        • Good DW
        • Stewart GD
        • Stolzenburg JU
        • et al.
        Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
        World J Urol. 2014; 32: 1225-1233
        • Skolarikos A
        • Alivizatos G
        • de la Rosette JJ
        Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy.
        Eur Urol. 2005; 47: 22-28
        • Yu W
        • Rao T
        • Li X
        • et al.
        The learning curve for access creation in solo ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the associated skills.
        Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49: 419-424
        • de la Rosette JJ
        • Laguna MP
        • Rassweiler JJ
        • et al.
        Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy–a critical review.
        Eur Urol. 2008; 54: 994-1001
        • Negrete-Pulido O
        • Molina-Torres M
        • Castaño-Tostado E
        • et al.
        Percutaneous renal access: the learning curve of a simplified approach.
        J Endourol. 2010; 24: 457-460
        • Jang WS
        • Choi KH
        • Yang SC
        • et al.
        The learning curve for Flank percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a single surgeon's experience.
        Korean J Urol. 2011; 52: 284-288
        • Quirke K
        • Aydin A
        • Brunckhorst O
        • et al.
        Learning curves in urolithiasis surgery: a systematic review.
        J Endourol. 2018; 32: 1008-1020