Patterns of Industry Payments to Urologists From 2014-2018



      To evaluate the patterns of financial transaction between industry and urologists in the first 5 years of reporting in the Open Payments Program (OPP) by comparing transactions over time, between academic and nonacademic urologists, and by provider characteristics among academic urologists.


      The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services OPP database was queried for General Payments to urologists from 2014-2018. Faculty at ACGME-accredited urology training programs were identified and characterized via publicly available websites. Industry transfers were analyzed by year, practice setting (academic vs nonacademic), provider characteristics, and AUA section. Payment nature and individual corporate contributions were also summarized.


      A total of 12,521 urologists – representing 75% of the urology workforce in any given year – received $168 million from industry over the study period. There was no significant trend in payments by year (P = .162). Urologists received a median of $1602 over the study period, though 14% received >$10,000. Payment varied significantly by practice setting (P <.001), with nonacademic urologists receiving more but smaller payments than academic urologists. Among academic urologists, gender (P <.001), department chair status (P <.001), fellowship training (P <.001), and subspecialty (P <.001) were significantly associated with amount of payment from industry. Annual payments from industry varied significantly by AUA section.


      Reporting of physician-industry transactions has not led to a sustained decline in transactions with urologists. Significant differences in industry interaction exist between academic and nonacademic urologists, and values transferred to academic urologists varied by gender, chair status, subspecialty, and AUA section.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Brunt CS
        Physician characteristics, industry transfers, and pharmaceutical prescribing: Empirical evidence from medicare and the physician payment sunshine act.
        Health Serv Res. 2019; 54: 636-649
        • Wazana A
        Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift?.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 373-380
        • Lopez JT
        • Prifogle EW
        • Nyame TW
        • Milton JW
        • May JW
        The impact of conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: an analysis of acellular dermal matrix, implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 1328-1334
        • Gray R
        • Tanna N
        • Kasabian A
        Conflict of interest at plastic surgery conferences: is it significant?.
        Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 308e-313e
        • Nakayama DK
        • Boeman AP
        Industry support of graduate medical education in surgery.
        Am Surg. 2009; 75: 395-400
        • Steinman MA
        • Landefeld S
        • Baron RB
        Industry support of CME - Are we at the tipping point?.
        NEJM. 2012; 366: 1069-1071
        • Perez TY
        • Chen MC
        • Chung PH
        • Shenot PJ
        Leaders in urologic education and their relationship to industry: an analysis of sunshine act open payments from 2014-2016.
        Urology. 2019; 123: 53-58
      1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, in Statute. 2010. p. 119-1024.

        • American Urological Association
        The State of Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States 2018.
        2019 (Linthicum, Maryland, U.S)
        • Cvetanovich GL
        • Chalmers PN
        • Bach Jr, BR
        Industry financial relationships in orthopaedic surgery: analysis of the sunshine act open payments database and comparison with other surgical subspecialties.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2015; 97: 1288-1295
        • Eloy JA
        • Bobian M
        • Svider PF
        • et al.
        Association of gender with financial relationships between industry and academic otolaryngologists.
        JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 143: 796-802
        • Han J
        • Stillings S
        • Hamann H
        • Terry R
        • Moy L
        Gender and subspecialty of urology faculty in department-based leadership roles.
        Urology. 2017; 110: 36-39
        • Ji YD
        • Peacock ZS.
        Shining sunlight on industry payments in oral and maxillofacial surgery: the sunshine act.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77: 685-689
        • Morse E
        • Berson E
        • Mehra S
        Industry involvement in otolaryngology: updates from the 2017 Open Payments database.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 161: 265-270