Advertisement

The Top 100 Cited Articles in Urethral Reconstruction

Published:October 02, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.052

      Abstract

      OBJECTIVE

      To examine the most cited literature in urethral reconstruction, review types of work published, and observe research trends.

      METHODS

      The Web of Sciences Sci-Expanded Index was used to conduct a search for urethral reconstruction. References were assessed for relevance to urethral reconstruction by 2 independent reviewers and a final list of the top 100 articles ranked by citation count was obtained. For each article, citation count, publication date, corresponding author, origin institution, origin country, topic area, study design, level of evidence, and origin journal were collected.

      RESULTS

      The mean citation count per publication was 108 (median = 94.5; range = 69-366, SD = 43) with a total of 10,874 citations for all papers since 1970. The top 100 articles were published between 1973 and 2011, came from 19 different countries and 16 different journals. Nearly half were case series and most studies were Level III evidence or lower. The United States was the largest contributor to the top 100 with 56 publications, followed by Italy (14), England (12), and Egypt (7). “Outcomes of surgical treatment for urethral stricture disease” was the most prevalent topic area comprising 55 articles in the top 100, with most articles including descriptions or outcomes of novel surgical techniques.

      CONCLUSION

      In this study, we discovered that the most cited literature in the field of urethral reconstruction is singularly focused and lacking in high levels of evidence. The top 100 cited articles originate primarily from the United States, focus on short-term outcomes after surgical treatment for urethral stricture disease, and are predominantly case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Atala A
        Experimental and clinical experience with tissue engineering techniques for urethral reconstruction.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2002; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(02)00033-2
        • Hampson LA
        • McAninch JW
        • Breyer BN
        Male urethral strictures and their management.
        Nat Rev Urol. 2014; 11: 43-50https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.275
        • Blaschko SD
        • Harris CR
        • Zaid UB
        • et al.
        Trends, utilization, and immediate perioperative complications of urethroplasty in the United States: data from the National Inpatient Sample 2000-2010.
        Urology. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.008
        • Santucci RA
        • Joyce GF
        • Wise M
        Male urethral stricture disease.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 1667-1674
        • Greenwell TJ
        • Castle C
        • Andrich DE
        • MacDonald JT
        • Nicol DL
        • Mundy AR
        Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective.
        J Urol. 2004; https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000132156.76403.8f
        • Osterberg EC
        • Murphy G
        • Harris CR
        • Breyer BN
        Cost-effective strategies for the management and treatment of urethral stricture disease.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.08.002
        • Maciwilan G
        • Andrews MW
        Treatment of urethral stricture.
        Medico-chirurgical Rev. 1827; 7: 69-72
        • Wood J
        Clinical lecture on urinary fistula of the penis, treated by urethroplasty.
        Br Med J. 1872; 2: 207
        • Nesbit RM
        The surgical treatment of congenital chordee without hypospadias.
        J Urol. 1954; 72: 1178-1180
        • Vanni AJ
        New frontiers in urethral reconstruction: injectables and alternative grafts.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2015; 4: 84-91https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.09
        • O'Kelly F
        • Nason GJ
        • McLoughlin LC
        • Flood HD
        • Thornhill JA
        A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945–2013).
        J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11: 85.e1-85.e11https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022
        • Nason GJ
        • Tareen F
        • Mortell A
        The top 100 cited articles in urology: an update.
        Can Urol Assoc J. 2013; 7: E16-E24https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.12223
        • Concato J
        • Shah N
        • Horwitz RI
        Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1887-1892https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200006223422507
        • Borawski KM
        • Norris RD
        • Fesperman SF
        • Vieweg J
        • Preminger GM
        • Dahm P
        Levels of evidence in the urological literature.
        J Urol. 2007; 178: 1429-1433https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.150
        • Joyce KM
        • Joyce CW
        • Kelly JC
        • Kelly JL
        • Carroll SM
        Levels of evidence in the plastic surgery literature: a citation analysis of the top 50 “classic” papers.
        Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42: 411https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.411
        • Tsai Y-L
        • Lee C-C
        • Chen S-C
        • Yen Z-S
        Top-cited articles in emergency medicine.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2006; 24: 647-654https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2006.01.001
        • Liu Y
        • Wang S
        • Xue J
        • et al.
        Hundred top-cited articles focusing on acute kidney injury: a bibliometric analysis.
        BMJ Open. 2016; 6e011630https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011630
        • Kazimoglu H
        • Dokur M
        The top 100 cited articles on urological emergencies: a bibliometric analysis.
        Turkish J Urol. 2018; : 239-250https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2017.82609
        • O'Kelly F
        • Nason GJ
        • McLoughlin LC
        • Flood HD
        • Thornhill JA
        A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).
        J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11: 85.e1-85.e11https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022
        • Wessells H
        • Angermeier KW
        • Elliott S
        • et al.
        Male urethral stricture: American Urological Association guideline.
        J Urol. 2017; 197: 182-190https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.087
        • Vickers AJ
        • Cronin AM
        • Masterson TA
        • Eastham JA
        How do you tell whether a change in surgical technique leads to a change in outcome?.
        J Urol. 2010; 183: 1510-1514https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.034
      1. Surgical innovation as the driver of change in academic surgery.
        Surgery. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURG.2018.11.021
        • Jackson MJ
        • Ivaz SL
        Quality and length of life, money and urethral stricture disease.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2015; 25: 346-351https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000179
        • Cotter KJ
        • Hahn AE
        • Voelzke BB
        • et al.
        Trends in urethral stricture disease etiology and urethroplasty technique from a multi-institutional surgical outcomes research group.
        Urology. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.046
        • Gallegos MA
        • Santucci RA
        Advances in urethral stricture management.
        F1000Research. 2016; 5: 2913https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9741.1
        • Ioannidis JPA
        Meta-research: why research on research matters.
        PLOS Biol. 2018; 16e2005468https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468
        • Vetterlein MW
        • Loewe C
        • Zumstein V
        • et al.
        Characterization of a standardized postoperative radiographic and functional voiding trial after 1-stage bulbar ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty and the impact on stricture recurrence-free survival.
        J Urol. 2019; 201: 563-572https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.041
        • Erickson BA
        • Elliott SP
        • Voelzke BB
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional 1-year bulbar urethroplasty outcomes using a standardized prospective cystoscopic follow-up protocol.
        Urology. 2014; 84: 213-217https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.054
        • Shortreed SM
        • Cook AJ
        • Coley RY
        • Bobb JF
        • Nelson JC
        Challenges and opportunities for using big health care data to advance medical science and public health.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2019; 188: 851-861https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy292
        • Morris PD
        • Narracott A
        • von Tengg-Kobligk H
        • et al.
        Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine.
        Heart. 2016; 102: 18-28https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2015-308044