Advertisement

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Image-guided Cryoablation of Completely Endophytic Renal Masses

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncologic control of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation in the treatment of completely endophytic renal masses. Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation is a minimally invasive and effective treatment for small renal masses. Image-guided cryoablation is an attractive treatment for completely endophytic tumors given the challenge in visualization of such lesions during surgical extirpation.

      Materials and Methods

      A retrospective study evaluating percutaneous cryoablation of completely endophytic renal masses with normal overlying renal cortex was performed. From January 2003 to December 2015, 200 endophytic renal masses (RENAL score 3 – endophytic/exophytic) were identified from an internal renal ablation database. After imaging review, 49 tumors with completely intact overlying renal cortex in 47 patients were included in the study. Outcomes, including complications and oncologic efficacy were evaluated according to standard nomenclature.

      Results

      Patients comprised 37 men and 10 women (mean age 64.0 years) who underwent 48 cryoablation procedures to treat 49 renal masses. Mean tumor size was 2.5  ±  0.5 cm. Major complications occurred following 5 of the 48 (10%) procedures. Forty of 46 (87%) tumors with imaging follow-up were recurrence-free at a mean of 56 months. Five of six local recurrences were successfully retreated with cryoablatoin.

      Conclusion

      Percutaneous thermal ablation of completely endophytic renal masses is a relatively safe procedure associated with acceptable complication and local tumor control rates. Given the complexities associated with partial nephrectomy, percutaneous cryoablation may be considered an alternative treatment for these select patients. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the durable efficacy of this treatment.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Cancer Society
        Cancer Facts & Figures 2019.
        American Cancer Society, Atlanta2019 (Available at)
      1. Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ,Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018.

        • Hollingsworth J.M.
        • Miller D.C.
        • Daignault S.
        • Hollenbeck B.K.
        Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reasess treatment effect.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98: 1331-1334
        • Campbell S.C.
        • Uzzo R.G.
        • Allaf M.E.
        • et al.
        Renal Mass and Localized renal cancer: AUA guidelines.
        J Urol. 2017; 198: 520-529
        • Allen B.C.
        • Remer E.M.
        Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: patient selection, technique, and postprocedural imaging.
        Radiographics. 2010; 30: 887-902
        • Parsons R.B.
        • Cantor D.
        • Kutikov A.
        • Uzzo R.G.
        RENAL Nephrometry Scoring System: the radiologist's perspective.
        AJR. 2012; 199: 355-359
        • Dindo D.
        • Demartines N.
        • Clavien P.A.
        Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205-213
        • Atwell T.D.
        • Carter R.E.
        • Schmit G.D.
        • et al.
        Complications following 573 percutaneous renal radiofrequency and cryoablation procedures.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 23: 48-54
        • Tanagho Y.S.
        • Kaouk J.H.
        • Allaf M.E.
        • et al.
        Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers.
        Urology. 2013; 81: 573-579
        • Atwell T.D.
        • Farrell M.A.
        • Callstrom M.R.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous cryoablation of large renal masses: technical feasibility and short-term outcome.
        AJR. 2007; 188: 1195-1200
        • Autorino R.
        • Khalifeh A.
        • Laydner H.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience.
        BJU Int. 2014; 113: 762-768
        • Johnson D.B.
        • Solomon S.B.
        • Su L.M.
        • et al.
        Defining the complications of cryoablation and radio frequency ablation of small renal tumors: a multi-institutional review.
        J Urol. 2004; 172: 874-877
        • Mullerad M.
        • Kastin A.
        • Adusumilli P.S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of nephron-sparing surgery in central verusus peripheral renal tumors.
        Urology. 2005; 65: 467-472
        • Rosenberg M.D.
        • Kim C.Y.
        • Tsivian M.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous cryoablation of renal lesions with radiographic ice ball involvement of the renal sinus: analysis of hemorrhagic and collecting system complications.
        AJU. 2011; 196: 935-939
        • Gervais D.A.
        • McGovern F.J.
        • Arellano R.S.
        • et al.
        Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: part 1, indications, results, and role in patient management over a 6-year period and ablation of 100 tumors.
        AJR. 2005; 185: 64-71
        • Varkarakis I.M.
        • Allaf M.E.
        • Inagaki T.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous radio frequency ablation of renal masses: results at a 2-year mean followup.
        J Urol. 2005; 174: 456-460
        • Iannuccilli J.D.
        • Dupuy D.E.
        • Beland M.D.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness and safety of computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal cancer: a 14-year single institution experience in 203 patients.
        Eur Radiol. 2016; 26: 1656-1664
        • Thompson R.H.
        • Atwell T.
        • Schmit G.
        • et al.
        Comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses.
        Eur Uro. 2015; 67: 252-259