Advertisement
Discussion| Volume 125, P161-162, March 2019

AUTHOR REPLY

  • Susan Y. Wu
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Felix Y. Feng
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA

    Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA

    University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Thomas A. Hope
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Thomas A. Hope, M.D., 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143.
    Affiliations
    University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA

    Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
    Search for articles by this author
      We greatly appreciate the thoughtful comments in regards to our manuscript, which highlight a number of important issues about the use of PSMA-PET. It should be noted at the outset that PSMA-PET should not be considered a standard imaging modality. In the United States, PSMA-PET is investigational and is not FDA approved. Although PSMA-PET may be considered standard of care in a few countries, its use in the United States is limited to clinical trials. Nonetheless, the prevalence of PSMA-PET is likely to increase in the next few years, as we should be close to approval of this agent in the coming year. Our hope is that the preliminary data presented in our manuscript may help guide the use of PSMA-PET imaging.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • van Leeuwen PJ
        • Emmett L
        • Ho B
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer.
        BJU International. 2017; 119: 209-215https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13540
        • Herlemann A
        • Wenter V
        • Kretschmer A
        • et al.
        68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Provides Accurate Staging of Lymph Node Regions Prior to Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
        European Urology. 2016; 70: 553-557https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.051
        • Zhang Q
        • Zang S
        • Zhang C
        • et al.
        Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer.
        J Transl Med. 2017; 15: 230https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1333-2
        • Budäus L
        • Leyh-Bannurah S-R
        • Salomon G
        • et al.
        Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.
        European Urology. 2016; 69: 393-396https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.010
        • Nguyen PL
        • Chen M-H
        • Hoffman KE
        • Katz MS
        • D'Amico AV
        Predicting the Risk of Pelvic Node Involvement Among Men With Prostate Cancer in the Contemporary Era.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74: 104-109https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.053
        • Hueting TA
        • Cornel EB
        • Somford DM
        • et al.
        External Validation of Models Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients.
        European Urology Oncology. 2018; 1: 411-417https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.016