Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined prostate-specific
antigen (PSA) density and MRI interpretation for the detection of clinically significant
prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database of men who received prostate
MRI prior to biopsy at our institution between September 2014 and December 2016, excluding
those on active surveillance (n = 372). Logistic regression models to predict clinically
significant PCa on biopsy were developed using (1) MRI-defined PSA density; (2) PSA
alone; and (3) the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculator. Additional
logistic regression models were then generated by combining the previous clinical
variables with MRI interpretation (ie, prostate imaging reporting and data system
[PI-RADS] classification): (1) MRI-defined PSA density + MRI interpretation; (2) PSA + MRI
interpretation; and (3) PCPT + MRI interpretation. Receiving operator characteristic
curves for each of the 6 models were generated, and the area under the curves (AUC)
were compared.
Results
MRI-defined PSA density (AUCPSAD = 0.77) significantly outperformed the PSA (AUCPSA = 0.66,
P < .01) and PCPT models (AUCPCPT = 0.70, P < .01). When combined with MRI interpretation (ie, PI-RADS classification), the MRI-defined
PSA density model (AUCPSAD + MRI = 0.80) significantly outperformed the PSA (AUCPSA + MRI = 0.75,
P < .01) and PCPT models (AUCPCPT + MRI = 0.76, P = .01).
Conclusion
In addition to the PI-RADS classification, prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance
imaging also provides an accurate assessment of prostate volume. By utilizing this
additional data to determine MRI-defined PSA density, we find that risk discrimination
for clinically significant PCa on biopsy can be significantly improved.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to UrologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Prostate-specific antigen-based screening: controversy and guidelines.BMC Med. 2015; 13https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0296-5
- Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2015; 68: 438-450https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037
- Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.Lancet. 2017; 389: 815-822https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
- Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review.Eur Urol. 2013; 63: 125
- Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted vs. conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: single-institution, matched cohort comparison.Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2015; 33: 109.e1-109.e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.09.004
- Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen.Eur Urol. 2016; 70: 846-853https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052
- Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.JAMA. 2015; 313: 390-397https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17942
- Negative predictive value of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: outcome of 5-year follow-up in men with negative findings on initial MRI studies.Eur J Radiol. 2014; 83: 1740-1745https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.06.026
- PSA density as a better predictor of prostate cancer than percent-free PSA in a repeat biopsy.J Chinese Med Assoc. 2011; 74: 552-555https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2011.10.004
- Re-examining Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) density: defining the optimal PSA range and patients for using PSA density to predict prostate cancer using extended template biopsy.Urology. 2017; 105: 123-128https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.015
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-017-0024-7
- Prostate magnetic resonance imaging provides limited incremental value over the memorial sloankettering cancer center preradical prostatectomy nomogram.Urology. 2018; 113: 119-128https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.051
- PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2.Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 16-40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052
- Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85: 1125-1131https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.025
- Prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer.Urology. 2014; 83: 1362-1367https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.035
- Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program.Urology. 2002; 60: 826-830https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01958-1
- The European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer - prostate cancer mortality at 13years of follow-up.Lancent. 2014; 384: 2027-2035https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0
- Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens.Can Urol Assoc J. 2016; 10: 264-268https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3236
- The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.BJU Int. 2012; 110: 36-42https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x
- Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis.Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 343-351https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11046
- Magnetic resonance imaging provides added value to the prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator for patients with estimated risk of high-grade prostate cancer less than or equal to 10%.Urology. 2017; 102: 182-189
Article info
Publication history
Published online: December 20, 2018
Accepted:
December 11,
2018
Received:
July 20,
2018
Footnotes
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.
Identification
Copyright
© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.