Reconstructive Urology| Volume 126, P222-226, April 2019

Download started.


Evaluation of Generic Versus Condition-Specific Quality of Life Indicators for Successful Urethral Stricture Surgery

Published:December 20, 2018DOI:



      To compare the utility of generic health quality of life (QOL) and condition specific indicators as patient reported outcomes measures for urethral stricture surgery.

      Materials and Methods

      Patient data were obtained from the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons collaborative database. Patients who underwent any successful urethroplasty and completed both pre- and postoperative generic and condition-specific questionnaires were included.


      A total of 201 patients met inclusion criteria. Urethral-stricture specific measures improved after surgery: mean LUTS score (13.1-4.0, p<0.05), Peeling curve (3.1-1.7, p < 0.05), and overall interference of urinary symptoms on life (3.0-1.6, p < 0.05). Mean overall health status visual analog scale (74.2-80.0, p < 0.05) and generic health QOL EQ-5D index scores (0.90-0.95, p < 0.05) also improved; however, individual EQ-5D measures assessing mobility, self-care, and activity level did not change. EQ-5D measures for pain/discomfort (1.48-1.23, p < 0.05) and anxiety/depression (1.33-1.21, p < 0.05) improved, but not to the same extent as stricture-specific measures. More patients reported improvement in condition-specific urethra/penis pain and bladder pain compared to improvement in generic EQ-5D pain/discomfort (p < 0.001).


      Generic health QOL indicators are less meaningful in the assessment of urethral stricture surgery and should be replaced with condition-specific outcomes measures. It is important to ensure that appropriate condition-specific outcomes measures are utilized as patient reported outcomes measures become more prevalent in medicine and potentially become utilized to evaluate surgeon outcomes and determine surgeon reimbursement.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Meeks JJ
        • Erickson BA
        • Granieri MA
        • et al.
        Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review.
        J Urol. 2009; 182: 1266-1270
        • Bertrand LA
        • Voelzke BB
        • Elliott SP
        • et al.
        Measuring and predicting patient dissatisfaction after anterior urethroplasty using patient reported outcomes measures.
        J Urol. 2016; 196: 453-461
        • Rosen RC
        • Cappelleri JC
        • Smith MD
        • et al.
        Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction.
        Int J Impot Res. 1999; 11: 319-326
        • Rosen RC
        • Catania J
        • Pollack L
        • et al.
        Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ): scale development and psychometric validation.
        Urology. 2004; 64: 777-782
        • Jackson MJ
        • Sciberras J
        • Mangera A
        • et al.
        Defining a patient-reported outcome measure for urethral stricture surgery.
        Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 60-68
        • Herdman M
        • Gudex C
        • Lloyd A
        • et al.
        Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).
        Qual Life Res. 2011; 20: 1727-1736
        • Jackson MJ
        • Chaudhury I
        • Mangera A
        • et al.
        A prospective patient-centred evaluation of urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture using a validated patient-reported outcome measure.
        Eur Urol. 2013; 64: 777-782
        • Peeling WB
        Diagnostic assessment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
        Prostate Suppl. 1989; 2: 51-68
        • Epstein RM
        • Street Jr., RL
        The values and value of patient-centered care.
        Ann Fam Med. 2011; 9: 100-103
        • Terwee CB
        • Bot SD
        • de Boer MR
        • et al.
        Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42
        • Baradaran N
        • Hampson LA
        • Edwards TC
        • et al.
        Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Urethral Reconstruction.
        Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19: 48
        • Kaplan SA
        • Olsson CA
        • Te AE
        The American Urological Association symptom score in the evaluation of men with lower urinary tract symptoms: at 2 years of followup, does it work?.
        J Urol. 1996; 155: 1971-1974
        • Heyns CF
        • Marais DC
        Prospective evaluation of the American Urological Association symptom index and peak urinary flow rate for the followup of men with known urethral stricture disease.
        J Urol. 2002; 168: 2051-2054
        • Morey AF
        • McAninch JW
        • Duckett CP
        • et al.
        American Urological Association symptom index in the assessment of urethroplasty outcomes.
        J Urol. 1998; 159: 1192-1194
        • Nuss GR
        • Granieri MA
        • Zhao LC
        • et al.
        Presenting symptoms of anterior urethral stricture disease: a disease specific, patient reported questionnaire to measure outcomes.
        J Urol. 2012; 187: 559-562
        • Tam CA
        • Elliott SP
        • Voelzke BB
        • et al.
        The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an inadequate tool to screen for urethral stricture recurrence after anterior urethroplasty.
        Urology. 2016; 95: 197-201
        • Kessler TM
        • Fisch M
        • Heitz M
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery for urethral stricture.
        J Urol. 2002; 167: 2507-2511
        • Breyer BN
        • Edwards TC
        • Patrick DL
        • et al.
        Comprehensive qualitative assessment of urethral stricture disease: toward the development of a patient centered outcome measure.
        J Urol. 2017; 198: 1113-1118