Advertisement
Pediatric Urology| Volume 125, P196-201, March 2019

Pediatric Partial Nephrectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Duplication Anomalies: A Comparison Between Different Surgical Approaches and Techniques

Published:November 23, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.026

      Abstract

      Objective

      To review and compare 4 different surgical approaches for partial nephrectomy of a nonfunctioning moiety in children with upper urinary tract duplication anomalies.

      Materials and methods

      A retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), or laparoendoscopic single site partial nephrectomy (LESS-PN) for the treatment of a nonfunctioning moiety in a duplicated collecting system at 2 medical centers between 2007 and 2017. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical techniques, complications, and results were compared.

      Results

      A total of 59 pediatric patients underwent partial nephrectomy for an upper urinary tract duplication anomaly during a 10-year period: 24 OPN, 7 LPN, 18 RPN, and 10 LESS-PN. Median age was 16 months (interquartile range 9-49.7). Median weight was 10.7 Kg (interquartile range 8.8-16.4). Median estimated blood loss was comparable between all minimally invasive approaches, but significantly increased in the open approach. OPN required more narcotics (0.554 mg Morphine equivalent/Kg/day, range 0.03-6.13) and Acetaminophen (72.12 mg/Kg/day, range 0-209.06) than all other groups in the study. Median operating time in OPN (154.5 minutes, range 108-413) and LESS-PN (140 minutes, range 65-245) were found to be significantly shorter in comparison to LPN (190 minutes, range 159-355), and RPN (256 minutes, range 163-458); (P = .03, .005, .02, and .005).

      Conclusion

      Minimally invasive approaches (LPN, RPN, and LESS-PN) for partial nephrectomy in upper urinary tract duplication anomalies may be associated with decreased postoperative analgesia requirements, shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and less use of drains in comparison to the open approach, while demonstrating efficacy and safety.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Koyanagi T.
        • Tsuji I.
        Experience of complete duplication of the collecting system: retrospective analysis of 23 cases with particular emphasis on the type of ureteral hiatus and its implication in the management of duplex.
        Int Urol Nephrol. 1979; 11: 27-38
        • Jordan G.H.
        • Winslow B.H.
        Laparoendoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with ureterectomy.
        J Urol. 1993; 150: 940-943
        • Bansal D.
        • Cost N.G.
        • Bean C.M.
        • Minevich E.A.
        • Noh P.H.
        Pediatric urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: single surgeon experience.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 1170-1175
        • Herz D.
        • Smith J.
        • McLeod D.
        • Schober M.
        • Preece J.
        • Merguerian P.
        Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of duplex renal anomaly: comparison of surgical outcomes to traditional pure laparoscopic and open surgery.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12 (44 e1-7)
        • Romao R.L.
        • Figueroa V.
        • Salle J.L.
        • Koyle M.A.
        • Bagli D.J.
        • Lorenzo A.J.
        Laparoscopic ureteral ligation (clipping): a novel, simple procedure for pediatric urinary incontinence due to ectopic ureters associated with non-functioning upper pole renal moieties.
        J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 1089-1094
        • Prieto J.
        • Ziada A.
        • Baker L.
        • Snodgrass W.
        Ureteroureterostomy via inguinal incision for ectopic ureters and ureteroceles without ipsilateral lower pole reflux.
        J Urol. 2009; 181 (discussion 8-50): 1844-1848
        • Dindo D.
        • Demartines N.
        • Clavien P.A.
        Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205-213
        • Bolduc S.
        • Upadhyay J.
        • Sherman C.
        • et al.
        Histology of upper pole is unaffected by prenatal diagnosis in duplex system ureteroceles.
        J Urol. 2002; 168: 1123-1126
        • Belman A.B.
        • Filmer R.B.
        • King L.R.
        Surgical management of duplication of the collecting system.
        J Urol. 1974; 112: 316-321
        • Culp O.S.
        Heminephro-ureterectomy: comparison of one-stage and two-stage operations.
        J Urol. 1960; 83: 369-375
        • Choi J.E.
        • You J.H.
        • Kim D.K.
        • Rha K.H.
        • Lee S.H.
        Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 891-901
        • Wu Z.
        • Li M.
        • Liu B.
        • et al.
        Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PloS One. 2014; 9: e94878
        • Kaouk J.H.
        • Palmer J.S.
        Single-port laparoscopic surgery: initial experience in children for varicocelectomy.
        BJU Int. 2008; 102: 97-99
        • Golebiewski A.
        • Losin M.
        • Murawski M.
        • Komasara L.
        • Czauderna P.
        Laparoscopic versus open upper pole heminephroureterectomy for the treatment of duplex kidneys in children.
        J Laparoendoscopic Adv Surg Tech Part A. 2013; 23: 942-945
        • Ballouhey Q.
        • Binet A.
        • Clermidi P.
        • et al.
        Partial nephrectomy for small children: robot-assisted versus open surgery.
        Int J Urol. 2017; 24: 855-860
        • Esposito C.
        • Escolino M.
        • Miyano G.
        • et al.
        A comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: a multicentric survey.
        World J Urol. 2016; 34: 939-948
        • Lee Z.
        • Schulte M.
        • DeFoor W.R.
        • et al.
        A Non-Narcotic Pathway for the Management of Postoperative pain following pediatric robotic pyeloplasty.
        J Endourol. 2017; 31: 255-258
        • Liberman D.
        • Trinh Q.D.
        • Jeldres C.
        • Zorn K.C.
        Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes.
        Curr Opin Urol. 2012; 22: 61-65