Advertisement
Medical Oncology| Volume 108, P135-141, October 2017

Download started.

Ok

Bone Scan Index Is an Independent Predictor of Time to Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study

      Objective

      To prospectively determine the prognostic value of the bone scan index (BSI) for time to development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in consecutive, hormone-naïve patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

      Patients and Methods

      Eligible patients participated in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the value of bone scintigraphy (BS) at staging. BSI was determined using the EXINI BoneBSI software in 208 consecutive patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. The presence or absence of bone metastases at staging was classified by BS with or without supplementary imaging. Follow-up was performed >5 years after including the last patient.

      Results

      During follow-up, 149 of the 208 patients (72%) were diagnosed with CRPC. Median time to CRPC was 20 months. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years in patients without CRPC. In univariate analyses, presence of bone metastases (M1) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-4.30), Gleason grade (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.79), and BSI (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.23) but not PSA significantly predicted time to CRPC (all, P < .001). The predictive values of M1 (HR 2.06), Gleason grade (HR 1.47), and BSI (HR 1.10) were confirmed in multivariate analyses. Log-rank test for equality of time to CRPC showed the significant predictive value of BSI (BSI = 0 vs 0 < BSI ≤ 1 vs BSI > 1, P < .001). In addition to routine assessment of M1 vs M0 status, BSI contributed to the predictive power.

      Conclusions

      BSI is an independent risk factor for the time from initiation of androgen deprivation therapy to CRPC in hormone-naïve patients. The significant prognostic factors, in rank order, were M1 status, Gleason grade, and BSI.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Norgaard M.
        • Jensen A.O.
        • Jacobsen J.B.
        • Cetin K.
        • Fryzek J.P.
        • Sorensen H.T.
        Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark (1999 to 2007).
        J Urol. 2010; 184: 162-167
        • Imbriaco M.
        • Larson S.M.
        • Yeung H.W.
        • et al.
        A new parameter for measuring metastatic bone involvement by prostate cancer: the Bone Scan Index.
        Clin Cancer Res. 1998; 4: 1765-1772
        • Ulmert D.
        • Kaboteh R.
        • Fox J.J.
        • et al.
        A novel automated platform for quantifying the extent of skeletal tumour involvement in prostate cancer patients using the Bone Scan Index.
        Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 78-84
        • Kaboteh R.
        • Gjertsson P.
        • Leek H.
        • et al.
        Progression of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer—automated detection of new lesions and calculation of bone scan index.
        EJNMMI Res. 2013; 3: 64
        • Nakajima K.
        • Nakajima Y.
        • Horikoshi H.
        • et al.
        Enhanced diagnostic accuracy for quantitative bone scan using an artificial neural network system: a Japanese multi-center database project.
        EJNMMI Res. 2013; 3: 83
        • Takahashi Y.
        • Yoshimura M.
        • Suzuki K.
        • et al.
        Assessment of bone scans in advanced prostate carcinoma using fully automated and semi-automated bone scan index methods.
        Ann Nucl Med. 2012; 26: 586-593
        • Poulsen M.H.
        • Rasmussen J.
        • Edenbrandt L.
        • et al.
        Bone Scan Index predicts outcome in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
        BJU Int. 2016; 117: 748-753
        • Anand A.
        • Morris M.J.
        • Larson S.M.
        • et al.
        Automated Bone Scan Index as a quantitative imaging biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients being treated with enzalutamide.
        EJNMMI Res. 2016; 6: 23
        • Dennis E.R.
        • Jia X.
        • Mezheritskiy I.S.
        • et al.
        Bone scan index: a quantitative treatment response biomarker for castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 519-524
        • Reza M.
        • Bjartell A.
        • Ohlsson M.
        • et al.
        Bone Scan Index as a prognostic imaging biomarker during androgen deprivation therapy.
        EJNMMI Res. 2014; 4: 58
        • Uemura K.
        • Miyoshi Y.
        • Kawahara T.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of a computer-aided diagnosis system involving bone scans among men treated with docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
        BMC Cancer. 2016; 16: 109
        • Zacho H.D.
        • Barsi T.
        • Mortensen J.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective multicenter study of bone scintigraphy in consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
        Clin Nucl Med. 2014; 39: 26-31
        • Bombardieri E.
        • Aktolun C.
        • Baum R.P.
        • et al.
        Bone scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.
        Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003; 30 (BP99-BB106)
        • Sadik M.
        • Hamadeh I.
        • Nordblom P.
        • et al.
        Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans.
        J Nucl Med. 2008; 49: 1958-1965
        • Heidenreich A.
        • Aus G.
        • Bolla M.
        • et al.
        EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 68-80
        • Scher H.I.
        • Halabi S.
        • Tannock I.
        • et al.
        Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1148-1159
        • Eisenhauer E.A.
        • Therasse P.
        • Bogaerts J.
        • et al.
        New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
        Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 228-247
        • Lowrance W.T.
        • Roth B.J.
        • Kirkby E.
        • Murad M.H.
        • Cookson M.S.
        Castration-resistant prostate cancer: AUA guideline amendment 2015.
        J Urol. 2016; 195: 1444-1452
        • Petersen L.J.
        • Mortensen J.C.
        • Bertelsen H.
        • Zacho H.D.
        Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scintigraphy in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
        Nucl Med Commun. 2015; 36: 679-685
        • Heidenreich A.
        • Bastian P.J.
        • Bellmunt J.
        • et al.
        EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.
        Eur Urol. 2014; 65: 124-137
        • Mohler J.L.
        • Armstrong A.J.
        • Bahnson R.R.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer, version 1.2016.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016; 14: 19-30
        • Heidenreich A.
        • Bastian P.J.
        • Bellmunt J.
        • et al.
        EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.
        Eur Urol. 2014; 65: 467-479
        • Armstrong A.J.
        • Kaboteh R.
        • Carducci M.A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the bone scan index in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tasquinimod in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
        Urol Oncol. 2014; 32: 1308-1316
        • Anand A.
        • Morris M.J.
        • Kaboteh R.
        • et al.
        Analytic validation of the automated bone scan index as an imaging biomarker to standardize quantitative changes in bone scans of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
        J Nucl Med. 2016; 57: 41-45
        • Petersen L.J.
        • Mortensen J.C.
        • Bertelsen H.
        • Zacho H.D.
        Computer-assisted analysis of skeletal lesions in the staging of prostate cancer: prospective multicenter study.
        Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43
        • Kaboteh R.
        • Damber J.E.
        • Gjertsson P.
        • et al.
        Bone Scan Index: a prognostic imaging biomarker for high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving primary hormonal therapy.
        EJNMMI Res. 2013; 3: 9
        • Miyoshi Y.
        • Yoneyama S.
        • Kawahara T.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of the bone scan index using a computer-aided diagnosis system for bone scans in hormone-naive prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
        BMC Cancer. 2016; 16: 128
        • Scher H.I.
        • Morris M.J.
        • Stadler W.M.
        • et al.
        Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3.
        J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 1402-1418
        • Sabbatini P.
        • Larson S.M.
        • Kremer A.
        • et al.
        Prognostic significance of extent of disease in bone in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17: 948-957
        • Soloway M.S.
        • Hardeman S.W.
        • Hickey D.
        • et al.
        Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan.
        Cancer. 1988; 61: 195-202
        • Sweeney C.J.
        • Chen Y.H.
        • Carducci M.
        • et al.
        Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 737-746