Reconstructive Urology| Volume 107, P232-238, September 2017

Download started.


The Impact of Age on Urethroplasty Success


      To determine if age is an independent predictor of surgical success in patients undergoing urethroplasty. Urethroplasty performed by excision and primary anastomosis depends on vascular collateralization. Successful augmented urethroplasty depends on graft neovascularization. Older patients have more comorbid conditions including peripheral vascular disease associated with reduced penile blood flow.


      This is a retrospective review of urethroplasties from 11 institutions. Primary outcome was functional success at 1 year from surgery, defined as freedom from post-urethroplasty procedures. Secondary outcome was freedom from cystoscopic evidence of stricture recurrence at 3 months. Study outcomes were compared between 2 age cohorts (<60 years old and ≥60 years old). Multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluated the influence of patient factors on our primary and secondary outcomes, using age as a continuous variable.


      Of 322 urethroplasties, 258 were performed in patients <60 years and 64 in patients ≥60 years. Median follow-up was 1.8 years. The following were not significantly different between groups: stricture length or location, smoking status, number of previous urethrotomies or dilations, and urethroplasty type. The following were more common in patients ≥60 years: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery and peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. There was no difference in need for repeat procedures or anatomic recurrence between age groups or with increasing age. Stricture length was the only statistically significant clinical factor.


      Urethroplasty success may be affected by comorbidities but not age. Age alone should not be used as an absolute exclusion criterion for men needing urethral reconstruction.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Santucci R.A.
        Male urethral stricture disease.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 1667-1674
        • Anger J.T.
        • Buckley J.C.
        • Santucci R.A.
        • et al.
        Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty.
        Urology. 2011; 77: 481-485
        • Lacy J.M.
        • Cavallini M.
        • Bylund J.R.
        • et al.
        Trends in the management of male urethral stricture disease in the veteran population.
        Urology. 2014; 84: 1506-1510
        • Barbagli G.
        • Morgia G.
        • Lazzeri M.
        Dorsal onlay skin graft bulbar urethroplasty: long-term follow-up.
        Eur Urol. 2008; 53: 628-634
        • Elliott S.P.
        • Metro M.J.
        • McAninch J.W.
        Long-term follow up of the ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction.
        J Urol. 2003; 169: 1754-1757
        • Santucci R.A.
        • Mario L.A.
        • McANinch J.W.
        Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients.
        J Urol. 2002; 167: 1715-1719
        • Santucci R.A.
        • McAninch J.W.
        • Mario L.A.
        • et al.
        Urethroplasty in patients older than 65 years: indications, results, outcomes and suggested treatment modifications.
        J Urol. 2004; 172: 201-203
        • Erickson B.A.
        • Elliott S.P.
        • Voelzke B.B.
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional 1-year bulbar urethroplasty outcomes using a standardized prospective cystoscopic follow-up protocol.
        Urology. 2014; 84: 213-217
        • Wessels H.
        • Angermeier K.
        • Elliott S.P.
        • et al.
        Male urethral stricture: AUA guidelines.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 22, 2016)
        • Schwentner C.
        • Seibold J.
        • Colleselli D.
        • et al.
        Dorsal onlay skin graft in patients older than 65 years.
        Urology. 2010; 76: 465-470
        • Kinnaird A.S.
        • Levine M.A.
        • Ambati D.
        • et al.
        Stricture length and etiology as preoperative independent predictors of recurrence after urethroplasty: a multivariate analysis of 604 urethroplasties.
        Can Urol Assoc J. 2014; 8: E296-E300
        • Erickson B.A.
        • Breyer B.N.
        • McAninch J.W.
        Changes in uroflowmetry maximum flow rates after urethral reconstructive surgery as a means to predict for stricture recurrence.
        J Urol. 2011; 186: 1934-1937
        • Johnson E.K.
        • Latini J.M.
        The impact of urethroplasty on voiding symptoms and sexual function.
        Urology. 2011; 78: 198-201
        • Barbagli G.
        • Montorsi F.
        • Guazzoni G.
        • et al.
        Ventral oral mucosal onlay graft urethroplasty in nontraumatic bulbar urethral strictures: surgical technique and multivariable analysis of results in 214 patients.
        Eur Urol. 2013; 64: 440-447
        • Breyer B.N.
        • McAninch J.W.
        • Whitson J.M.
        • et al.
        Multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term urethroplasty outcome.
        J Urol. 2010; 183: 613-617
        • Liu J.
        • Liu Y.
        • Zhuang L.
        • et al.
        One-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture.
        BMC Urol. 2014; 14: 35
        • Blaschko S.D.
        • McAninch J.W.
        • Myers J.B.
        • et al.
        Urethroplasty after failed urethral reconstruction: outcome analysis of 130 patients.
        J Urol. 2012; 188: 2260-2264
        • Marchal C.
        • Pérez J.E.
        • Herrera B.
        • et al.
        Barbagli's dorsal urethroplasty. Analysis of results and factors for success.
        Arch Esp Urol. 2010; 63: 537-544
        • Wang P.
        • Fan M.
        • Zhang Y.
        • et al.
        Modified urethral pull-through operation for posterior urethral stricture and long-term outcome.
        J Urol. 2008; 180: 2479-2485
        • Kulkarni S.B.
        • Joshi P.M.
        • Venkatesan K.
        Management of panurethral stricture disease in India.
        J Urol. 2012; 188: 824-830
        • Ahmad H.
        • Mahmood A.
        • Niaz W.A.
        • et al.
        Bulbar urethral stricture repair with buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.
        J Pak Med Assoc. 2011; 61: 440-442
        • Morey A.F.
        • Lin H.C.
        • DeRosa C.A.
        • et al.
        Fossa navicularis reconstruction: impact of stricture length on outcomes and assessment of extended meatotomy (first stage Johanson) maneuver.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 184-187
        • Barbagli G.
        • Palminteri E.
        • Guazzoni G.
        • et al.
        Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique?.
        J Urol. 2005; 174: 955-957
        • Love K.M.
        • Mehaffrey J.H.
        • Safavian D.
        • et al.
        Bariatric surgery insurance requirements independently predict surgery dropout.
        Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017; ([Epub ahead of print])