The Expanding Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Urologic Procedural Care


      To understand the role of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) in urologic procedural care and its change over time. As the population ages and the urologic workforce struggles to meet patient access demands, the role of APPs in the provision of all aspects of urologic care is increasing. However, little is currently known about their role in procedural care.

      Materials and Methods

      Commonly performed urologic procedures were linked to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes from 1994 to 2012. National Medicare Part B beneficiary claims frequency was identified using Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files. Trends were studied for APPs, urologists, and all other providers nationally across numerous procedures spanning complexity, acuity, and technical skill set requirements.


      Between 1994 and 2012, annual Medicare claims for urologic procedures by APPs increased dramatically. Cystoscopy increased from 24 to 1820 (+7483%), transrectal prostate biopsy from 17 to 834 (+4806%), complex Foley catheter placement from 471 to 2929 (+522%), urodynamics testing from 41 to 9358 (+22,727%), and renal ultrasound from 18 to 4500 (+24,900%)


      We found dramatic growth in the provision of urologic procedural care by APPs over the past 2 decades. These data reinforce the known expansion of the APP role in urology and support the timeliness of ongoing collaborative multidisciplinary educational efforts to address unmet needs in education, training, and guideline formation to maximize access to urologic procedural services.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Morton-Rias D.
        2015 Statistical Profile of Certified Physician Assistants. An Annual Report of the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 31, 2016)
        • Nurse Practitioners
        American Association of Nurse Practitioners.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 31, 2016)
        • Hooker R.S.
        • Cawley J.F.
        • Everett C.M.
        Predictive modeling the physician assistant supply: 2010-2025.
        Public Health Rep. 2011; 126: 708-716
        • Langston J.L.
        • Kirby E.W.
        • Pruthi R.S.
        AUA Workforce and Compensation Survey.
        • Langston J.P.
        • Orcutt V.L.
        • Smith A.S.
        • et al.
        Advanced practice providers in U.S. urology: a national survey of demographics and clinical roles.
        Urol Pract. 2016; (ePub ahead of print)
        • Duszak R.
        • Bilal N.
        • Picus D.
        • Hughes D.R.
        • Xu B.J.
        Central venous access: evolving roles of radiology and other specialties nationally over two decades.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2013; 10: 603-612
        • Angel W.
        • Hawkins C.M.
        • Wang J.M.
        • Hughes D.R.
        • Duszak R.
        Percutaneous hepatic and renal biopsy procedures: an 18-year analysis of changing utilization, specialty roles, and sites of service.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015; 26: 680-685
        • Duszak R.
        • Walls D.G.
        • Wang J.M.
        • et al.
        Expanding roles of nurse practitioners and physician assistants as providers of nonvascular invasive radiology procedures.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12: 284-289
        • CMS
        Data from the 100 percent denominator file.
        (Available at:) (Accessed November 2015)
        • Etzioni D.A.
        • Liu J.H.
        • Maggard M.A.
        • et al.
        The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce.
        Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 170
        • Pruthi R.S.
        • Neuwahl S.
        • Nielsen M.E.
        • et al.
        Recent trends in the urology workforce in the United States.
        Urology. 2013; 82: 987
        • McKibben M.J.
        • Kirby E.W.
        • Langston J.P.
        • et al.
        Projecting the urology workforce over the next 20 years.
        Urology. 2016; (ePub ahead of print)
        • Cawley J.F.
        • Hooker R.S.
        Physician assistants in American medicine: the half-century mark.
        Am J Manag Care. 2013; 19: e333-e341
        • American Association of Nurse Practitioners
        Historical timeline.
        (Available at:) (Accessed on March 31, 2016)
        • Nyberg S.M.
        • Keuter K.R.
        • Berg G.M.
        Acceptance of physician assistants and nurse practitioners in trauma centers.
        JAAPA. 2010; 23 (41): 35-37
        • Reilly B.K.
        • Brandon G.
        • Shah R.
        The role of advanced practice providers in pediatric otolaryngology academic practices.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77: 36-40
        • Ellis B.W.
        (Chairman) (2000) Nurse Cystoscopy.
        (Report of a Working Party of the British Association of Urological Surgeons; Available at:) (Accessed March 31, 2016)
        • Kerr R.R.
        UK experience with NPs may be harbinger for U.S. urology.
        (Urology Times; Available at:) (Accessed May 29, 2015)
        • Sapre N.
        • Bugeja P.
        • Hayes E.
        • Corcoran N.M.
        • Costello A.
        • Anderson P.D.
        Nurse-led flexible cystoscopy in Australia: initial experience and early results.
        BJU Int. 2012; 110: 46-50
        • Fagerberg M.
        • Nostell P.O.
        Follow up of urinary bladder cancer—a task for the urology nurse?.
        Lakartidningen. 2005; 102: 2149-2150
        • Ikenberry S.O.
        • Anderson M.A.
        • Banerjee S.
        • et al.
        Endoscopy by non-physicians.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 767-770
        • Schoenfeld P.
        • Lipzcomb S.
        • Crook J.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial.
        Gastroenterology. 1999; 117: 312-318
        • Maule W.F.
        Screening for colorectal cancer by nurse endoscopists.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 183-187
        • Kilic G.
        • England J.
        • Borahay M.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012; 33: 183-186
        • McPherson G.
        • Horsburgh M.
        • Tracy C.
        A clinical audit of a nurse colposcopist. Colposcopy: cytology: histology correlation.
        Nurs Prax N Z. 2005; 21: 13-23
        • Gilani N.
        • Patel N.
        • Gerkin R.D.
        • Ramirez F.C.
        • Tharalson E.E.
        • Patel K.
        The safety and feasibility of large volume paracentesis performed by an experienced nurse practitioner.
        Ann Hepatol. 2009; 8: 359-363
        • Murphy F.B.
        • Walls G.
        • Tridandapani S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of image guided nonfocal hepatic biopsies performed by physicians and nurse midlevel providers.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 1059-1063
        • Hooker R.S.
        • Cipher D.J.
        • Sekscenski E.
        Patient satisfaction with physician assistant, nurse practitioner, and physician care: a national survey of Medicare beneficiaries.
        J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2005; 12: 88
        • Larkin G.L.
        • Hooker R.S.
        Patient willingness to be seen by physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and residents in the emergency department: does the presumption of assent have an empirical basis?.
        Am J Bioeth. 2010; 10: 1
        • Hooker R.S.
        • Potts R.
        • Ray W.
        Patient satisfaction: comparing physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and physicians.
        Perm J. 1997; 1: 38