Reconstructive Urology| Volume 99, P246-253, January 2017

Download started.


Patient-centered Treatment Decisions for Urethral Stricture: Conjoint Analysis Improves Surgical Decision-making

Published:September 16, 2016DOI:


      To determine whether the use of a choice-based conjoint analysis (CA) exercise decreased patients' decisional conflict about treatment preferences for surgical management of urethral stricture disease. Understanding patient preferences for treatment decisions assists in shared decision-making and emphasizes patient-centered outcomes. CA offers a method to understand what risks patients are willing to take for what gains.


      The CA methodology was used by providing participants with case-based choices to elucidate the relative importance that individuals place on various treatment aspects. Patients' decisional conflict regarding surgery for urethral stricture was assessed before and after the CA exercise to assess the impact the exercise had on their decisional conflict.


      Completion of the CA exercise resulted in a significant decrease in decisional conflict (P < .001). The majority (59.5%) of participants with decisional conflict before the CA exercise experienced a decrease in decisional conflict afterwards, with only a minority (16.5%) experiencing new decisional conflict after the exercise. Participants felt the choice-based CA exercise was helpful in deciding what was important in making treatment decisions (70%) and in expressing their priorities and treatment preferences (82%). The number needed to counsel to achieve a decrease in decisional conflict was 1.69 and to achieve no decisional conflict was 3.65.


      Choice-based CA improves patients' ability to express their treatment preferences and decreases decisional conflict. CA may be a new tool that physicians and patients can use to aid in shared decision-making with a focus on patient-centered outcomes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Charles C.
        • Gafni A.
        • Whelan T.
        Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.
        Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49: 651-661
        • Say R.E.
        • Thomson R.
        The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions–challenges for doctors.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 542-545
        • Stiggelbout A.M.
        • Van der Weijden T.
        • De Wit M.P.T.
        • et al.
        Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.
        BMJ. 2012; 344: e256
        • Greenfield S.
        • Greenfield S.
        • Kaplan S.
        • Kaplan S.
        • Ware J.E.
        • Ware J.E.
        Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes.
        Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102: 520-528
        • Janis I.L.
        • Mann L.
        Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment.
        Free Press, New York, NY1977
        • Légaré F.
        • Kearing S.
        • Clay K.
        • et al.
        Are you SURE?: assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test.
        Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56: e308-e314
        • O'Connor A.M.
        Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
        Med Decis Making. 1995; 15: 25-30
        • Stacey D.
        • Légaré F.
        • Col N.F.
        • et al.
        Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (CD001431)
        • Wouters H.
        • Van Dijk L.
        • Van Geffen E.C.G.
        • et al.
        Do the benefits of statins outweigh their drawbacks? Assessing patients' trade-off preferences with conjoint analysis.
        Int J Cardiol. 2014; 176: 1220-1222
        • Wouters H.
        • Maatman G.A.
        • Van Dijk L.
        • et al.
        Trade-off preferences regarding adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
        Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: 2324-2329
        • Wilson L.
        • Loucks A.
        • Bui C.
        • et al.
        Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk-benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices.
        J Neurol Sci. 2014; 344: 80-87
        • Utz K.S.
        • Hoog J.
        • Wentrup A.
        • et al.
        Patient preferences for disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis therapy: a choice-based conjoint analysis.
        Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014; 7: 263-275
        • Silverman S.
        • Calderon A.
        • Kaw K.
        • et al.
        Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis.
        Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24: 2067-2077
        • Robinson S.M.
        • Ní Bhuachalla B.
        • Ní Mhaille B.
        • Cotter P.E.
        • O'Connor M.
        • O'Keeffe S.T.
        Home, please: a conjoint analysis of patient preferences after a bad hip fracture.
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015; 15: 1165-1170
        • Hollin I.L.
        • Peay H.L.
        • Bridges J.F.P.
        Caregiver preferences for emerging Duchenne muscular dystrophy treatments: a comparison of best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis.
        Patient. 2015; 8: 19-27
        • Santucci R.A.
        • Joyce G.F.
        • Wise M.
        Male urethral stricture disease.
        J Urol. 2007; 177: 1667-1674
        • Hampson L.A.
        • McAninch J.W.
        • Breyer B.N.
        Male urethral strictures and their management.
        Nat Rev Urol. 2014; 11: 43-50
        • Barry M.J.
        • Fowler F.J.
        • O'Leary M.P.
        • et al.
        The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association.
        J Urol. 1992; 148 (discussion 1564): 1549-1557
        • Ferron Parayre A.
        • Labrecque M.
        • Rousseau M.
        • Turcotte S.
        • Légaré F.
        Validation of SURE, a four-item clinical checklist for detecting decisional conflict in patients.
        Med Decis Making. 2014; 34: 54-62
        • Saigal C.S.
        • Dahan E.
        The voice of the patient.
        in: Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. 2012 (Available from:)
        • America COQOHCI, Institute of Medicine (US)
        Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academy Press, 2001
        • American Urological Association (US)
        AUA White Paper on Implementation of Shared Decision Making into Urological Practice.
        (Available from:)
        • Hanson L.C.
        • Carey T.S.
        • Caprio A.J.
        • et al.
        Improving decision-making for feeding options in advanced dementia: a randomized, controlled trial.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 2009-2016
        • Hess E.P.
        • Hess E.P.
        • Knoedler M.A.
        • et al.
        The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5: 251-259
        • Légaré F.
        • Labrecque M.
        • LeBlanc A.
        • et al.
        Training family physicians in shared decision making for the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections: a pilot clustered randomized controlled trial.
        Health Expect. 2011; 14: 96-110
        • Montori V.M.
        • Shah N.D.
        • Pencille L.J.
        • et al.
        Use of a decision aid to improve treatment decisions in osteoporosis: the osteoporosis choice randomized trial.
        Am J Med. 2011; 124: 549-556
        • Mullan R.J.
        • Montori V.M.
        • Shah N.D.
        • et al.
        The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial.
        Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1560-1568
        • Sheridan S.L.
        • Shadle J.
        • Simpson R.J.
        • Pignone M.P.
        The impact of a decision aid about heart disease prevention on patients' discussions with their doctor and their plans for prevention: a pilot randomized trial.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6: 121