Advertisement

Estimation of Size of Distal Ureteral Stones: Noncontrast CT Scan Versus Actual Size

      Objectives

      To determine the accuracy of stone size determination by computed tomography (CT) for distal ureteral calculi.

      Methods

      A total of 76 patients who presented with distal ureteral stone were evaluated with CT. Of the 76 patients, 41 successfully passed the stone spontaneously and intact. The largest stone size dimension measured on CT by an experienced endourologist was compared with the actual measured size of the spontaneously expulsed stone as measured by digital calipers.

      Results

      The mean actual size of the stone was 4.51 mm (range 1-9.2, SD ± 1.91). The mean largest dimension measured on CT was 5.51 mm (range 2-11.2, SD ± 2.09). The correlation coefficient (r) when comparing the actual size with the CT scan measurement was −0.022. When the largest stone dimension was obtained on the craniocaudal CT images, the correlation coefficient was 0.097. When the largest stone dimension was obtained on the axial CT image, the correlation coefficient was −0.107.

      Conclusions

      CT scan imaging is a poor predictor of the largest stone dimension for distal ureteral calculi. Caution should be used in counseling patients on the rate of spontaneous stone passage when determined using CT measurements of stone size.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Smith R.C.
        • Rosenfield A.T.
        • Choe K.A.
        • et al.
        Acute flank pain: Comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.
        Radiology. 1995; 194: 789-794
        • Lanoue M.Z.
        • Mindell H.J.
        The use of unenhanced helical CT to evaluate suspected renal colic.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169: 1579-1584
        • Sommer F.G.
        • Jeffrey Jr, R.B.
        • Rubin G.D.
        • et al.
        Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: Value of reformatted non-contrast helical CT.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165: 509-513
        • Parsons J.K.
        • Lancini V.
        • Shetye K.
        • et al.
        Urinary stone size: Comparison of abdominal plain radiography and noncontrast CT measurements.
        J Endourol. 2003; 17: 725-728
        • Dalrymple N.C.
        • Verga M.
        • Anderson K.R.
        • et al.
        The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.
        J Urol. 1998; 159: 735-740
        • Altman D.G.
        Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
        in: Chapman & Hall, New York1991: 396-403
        • Olcott E.W.
        • Sommer F.G.
        • Napel S.
        Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: In vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography and nephrotomography.
        Radiology. 1997; 204: 19-25
        • Kampa R.J.
        • Ghani K.R.
        • Wahed S.
        • et al.
        Size matters: A survey of how urinary-tract stones are measured in the UK.
        J Endourol. 2005; 19: 856-860
        • Narepalem N.
        • Sundaram C.P.
        • Boridy I.C.
        • et al.
        Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
        J Urol. 2002; 167: 1235-1238
        • Zagoria R.J.
        • Khatod E.G.
        • Chen M.Y.M.
        Abdominal radiography after CT reveals urinary calculi: A method to predict usefulness of abdominal radiography on the basis of size and CT attenuation of calculi.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 1117-1122
        • Van Appledorn S.
        • Ball A.J.
        • Patel V.R.
        • et al.
        Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones.
        J Endourol. 2003; 17: 851-854
        • Dundee P.
        • Bouchier-Hayes D.
        • Haxhimolla H.
        • et al.
        Renal tract calculi: Comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan.
        J Endourol. 2006; 20: 1005-1009