Size of external genital organs and somatometric parameters among physically normal men younger than 40 years old


      Objectives. To estimate the sizes of the external genital organs in physically normal adult males younger than 40 years old, as well as to correlate the resulting values with age and a number of somatometric parameters, to provide data that could be clinically applicable by the practicing urologist.
      Methods. Fifty-two physically normal men, 19 to 38 years old, underwent tape measurements of penile dimensions in the flaccid-stretched state (total, shaft, glanular lengths), penile shaft volume calculation, and ultrasonographic testicular volume estimation. The resultant values were correlated with age, height, weight, body mass index, waist/hip ratio, and index finger length.
      Results. The mean testicular volume was 16.9 ± 4.7 cm3, with the right testis (17.5 ± 5.8 cm3) measuring slightly larger than the left (15.85 ± 4.9 cm3; P = not significant). The mean total penile length was 12.18 ± 1.7 cm, the mean penile shaft length was 7.76 ± 1.3 cm, the mean glanular length was 4.4 ± 0.4 cm, and the mean penile shaft volume was 46.5 ± 17.2 cm3. Among the various correlations performed, the penile lengths (total, shaft, glanular) to index finger length (P <0.05) and to penile shaft volume (P <0.001) were statistically significant.
      Conclusions. Data on the size of the external genital organs among physically normal young adult men were provided and a novel formula for penile shaft volume calculation was proposed. Age and somatometric parameters were not associated with the size of the genitalia, excluding the index finger length, which correlated significantly with the dimensions of the flaccid, maximally stretched, penis.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Wessels H.
        • Lue T.F.
        • McAninch J.W.
        Penile length in the flaccid and erect state.
        J Urol. 1996; 156: 995-997
        • Austoni E.
        • Guarneri A.
        • Gatti G.
        Penile elongation and thickening—a myth?.
        Andrologia. 1999; 31: 45-51
        • Lee A.P.
        • Coughlin T.M.
        • Bellinger F.M.
        No relationship of testicular size at orchiopexy with fertility in men who previously had unilateral cryptorchidism.
        J Urol. 2001; 166: 236-239
        • Bondil P.
        • Costa P.
        • Daures J.P.
        • et al.
        Clinical study of the longitudinal deformation of the flaccid penis and its variations with ageing.
        Eur Urol. 1992; 21: 284-286
        • da Ros C
        • Teloken C.
        • Sogari P.
        • et al.
        Caucasian penis.
        J Urol. 1994; 151 (abstract): 323A-325A
        • Taskinen S.
        • Taavitsainen M.
        • Wikstrom S.
        Measurement of testicular volume.
        J Urol. 1996; 155: 930-933
        • Behre H.M.
        • Nashan D.
        • Nieschlag E.
        Objective measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography.
        Int J Androl. 1989; 12: 395-403
        • Honig S.C.
        New diagnostic techniques in the evaluation of anatomic abnormalities of the infertile male.
        Urol Clin North Am. 1994; 21: 417-432
        • Horton E.S.
        in: Stein J.H. Internal Medicine. 4th ed. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis1994: 1263-1264
        • Ponchietti R.
        • Mondaini N.
        • Bonafe M.
        • et al.
        Penile length and circumference.
        Eur Urol. 2001; 39: 183-186
        • Alter G.J.
        Augmentation phalloplasty.
        Urol Clin North Am. 1995; 22: 887-902
        • Ludwig G.
        Micropenis and apparent micropenis—a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
        Andrologia. 1999; 31: 27-30
        • Schonfeld W.A.
        • Beebe G.W.
        Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity.
        J Urol. 1942; 48: 759-763
        • Kinsey A.C.
        • Pomeroy W.B.
        • Martin C.E.
        Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1948
        • Schneider T.
        • Sperling H.
        • Lummen G.
        • et al.
        Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? A prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men.
        Urology. 2001; 57: 314-318
        • Prader A.
        Testicular size.
        Triangle. 1966; 7: 240-243
        • Takihara H.
        • Cosentino M.J.
        • Sakatoku J.
        • et al.
        Significance of testicular size measurement in andrology. II. Correlation of testicular size with testicular function.
        J Urol. 1987; 137: 416-419
        • Abramsson L.
        On the investigation of men from infertile relations.
        Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988; 113: 1-47
        • Daniel Jr, W.A.
        • Feinstein R.A.
        • Howard-Peebles P.
        • et al.
        Testicular volumes of adolescents.
        J Pediatr. 1982; 101: 1010-1012
        • Skoog J.S.
        • Roberts P.K.
        • Goldstein M.
        • et al.
        The adolescent varicocele.
        Pediatrics. 1997; 100: 112-122
        • Cendron M.
        • Huff D.S.
        • Keating M.A.
        • et al.
        Anatomical, morphological and volumetric analysis.
        J Urol. 1993; 149: 570-572
        • Diamond D.A.
        • Paltiel H.J.
        • DiCanzio J.
        • et al.
        Comparative assessment of pediatric testicular volume.
        J Urol. 2000; 164: 1111-1114
        • Costabile R.A.
        • Skoog S.
        • Radowich M.
        Testicular volume assessment in the adolescent with a varicocele.
        J Urol. 1992; 147: 1348-1350
        • Schlegel P.N.
        • Chang T.S.K.
        Physiology of male reproduction.
        in: Walsh P.C. Retik A.B. Vaughan D.E. Campbell’s Urology, 7th ed. vol 2. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1988: 1254-1286
        • Wikramanayake E.
        Testicular size in young adult Sinhalese.
        Int J Androl. 1995; 18: 29-31