Advertisement

Effect of age and surgical approach on complications and short-term mortality after radical prostatectomy—a population-based study

      Abstract

      Objectives. To use population-based data to accurately delineate the types and incidence of complications, risk of readmission, and influence of age and surgical approach on short-term mortality after radical prostatectomy.
      Methods. Medicare claims from 1991 to 1994 were used to identify and quantify the types and risks of complications, rehospitalization within 90 days, and mortality at 30 and 90 days after perineal or retropubic prostatectomy. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationships between age, surgical approach, and short-term outcomes while adjusting for potential confounders.
      Results. On the basis of data from 101,604 men, complications affected 25.0% to 28.8% of patients treated with the perineal or retropubic approach. The retropubic approach had a higher risk of respiratory complications (relative risk [RR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37 to 1.71) and miscellaneous medical complications (RR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.60 to 1.97) and a lower risk of miscellaneous surgical complications (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94). Differences in medically related gastrointestinal complications partially accounted for the differences in miscellaneous medical complications. Rectal injury with the perineal approach was only ∼1% to 2%. Readmission within 90 days was necessary for 8.5% to 8.7% of patients who underwent the retropubic or perineal approach. The 30-day mortality was less than 0.5% for men aged 65 to 69; it approached 1% for men aged 75 and older.
      Conclusions. Complications and readmission after prostatectomy are substantially more common than previously recognized. Notable differences exist in the incidence of respiratory and nonsurgical gastrointestinal complications, although many short-term outcomes are comparable for the two approaches. Older age is associated with elevated surgical mortality and complications.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Urology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Landis S.H
        • Murray T
        • Bolden S
        • et al.
        Cancer statistics, 1998.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 1998; 48: 6-29
        • Middleton R.G
        The management of clinically localized prostate cancer.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 1996; 46: 249-253
        • Salomon L
        • Colombel M
        • Patard J.J
        • et al.
        Retropubic and perineal approach.
        Prog Urol. 1997; 7: 976-983
        • Haab F
        • Boccon-Gibod L
        • Boccon-Gibod V
        • et al.
        Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer.
        Br J Urol. 1994; 74: 626-629
        • Frazier H.A
        • Robertson J.E
        • Paulson D.F
        Radical prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 1992; 147: 888-890
        • Kraus C.T
        • Persky L
        Radical perineal prostatectomy in patients over age of seventy.
        Urology. 1981; 18: 368-369
        • Lassen P.M
        • Kearse Jr, W.S
        Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy.
        Urology. 1995; 45: 266-269
        • Lerner S.E
        • Fleischmann J
        • Taub H.C
        • et al.
        Combined laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection and modified belt radical perineal prostatectomy for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.
        Urology. 1994; 43: 493-498
        • Levy D.A
        • Resnick M.I
        Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 1994; 151: 905-908
        • Levy J.B
        • Ramchandani P
        • Berlin J.W
        • et al.
        Vesicourethral healing following radical prostatectomy.
        Urology. 1994; 44: 888-892
        • Parra R.O
        • Boullier J.A
        • Rauscher J.A
        • et al.
        The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 1994; 151: 1599-1602
        • Teichman J.M
        • Reddy P.K
        • Hulbert J.C
        Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
        Urology. 1995; 45: 823-830
        • Walther P.J
        Radical perineal vs. retropubic prostatectomy.
        Eur Urol. 1993; 24: 34-38
        • Weldon V.E
        • Tavel F.R
        • Neuwirth H
        Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 1997; 158 (see comments): 1470-1475
        • Division of Quality Control Management AHA
        International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. American Hospital Publishing, Chicago1989
      1. Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology. American Medical Association, Chicago1995
        • Lu-Yao G.L
        • McLerran D
        • Wasson J
        • et al.
        An assessment of radical prostatectomy.
        JAMA. 1993; 269: 2633-2636
      2. Iezzoni L: Screening quality of care using administrative data: final report. Report to the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1992.

        • Harrell F.E
        The LOGISTIC Procedure. 5th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina1986
        • Mokulis J
        • Thompson I
        Radical prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 1997; 157: 230-232
        • Boxer R.J
        • Kaufman J.J
        • Goodwin W.E
        Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: 1951–1976. A review of 329 patients.
        J Urol. 1977; 117: 208-213
        • Paulson D.F
        Rectal injuries during radical perineal prostatectomy.
        Urology. 1995; 45 (editorial comment): 269
        • Mark D.H
        Mortality of patients after radical prostatectomy.
        J Urol. 1994; 152: 896-898
        • Fisher E.S
        • Whaley F.S
        • Krushat W.M
        • et al.
        The accuracy of Medicare’s hospital claims data.
        Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 243-248
      3. Madans J, Rothwell S, Reuben C, et al: A comparison of respondent, facility and Medicare provided information on hospital utilization for a national longitudinal cohort. Presented at the 118th Meeting of the American Public Health Association, New York, New York, October 1990.