Urology
Volume 54, Issue 6 , Pages 1088-1091, December 1999

Partial nephrectomy for centrally located tumors

  • David Y Chan

      Affiliations

    • James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • ,
  • Fray F Marshall

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Fray F. Marshall, M.D., Department of Urology, Emory University Hospital, 1365 Clifton Road Northeast, Building A, Room 3225, Atlanta, GA 30322

Received 3 March 1999; received in revised form 27 July 1999; accepted 27 July 1999.

Abstract 

Introduction. Interest in nephron-sparing surgery has been spurred by the good long-term results of patients treated with partial nephrectomy. Partial nephrectomy entails the complete resection of renal tumor while leaving behind clear surgical margins and maximum functional renal parenchyma.

Technical Considerations. We prefer to access the renal tumor by a flank incision. Intraoperative sonography is used to define the operative lesion and to search for multicentric tumors. A vascular clamp is placed on the renal hilum for vascular control. Regional hypothermia protects the kidney during renal ischemia. The perinephric fat is excised in situ with the renal tumor. Tumor base biopsies ensure negative margins. Meticulous dissection and tying of vessels improves hemostasis. Diluted methylene blue is directly injected into the renal pelvis to inspect for any intrarenal leakage. The argon beam coagulator is used routinely, and collagen (Avitene) is placed into the renal defect for hemostasis. The renal parenchyma and Gerota’s fascia are reapproximated anatomically. A small drain is left in place, and the wound is closed in the usual manner.

Conclusions. Recent studies continue to report that conservative surgery is as effective as radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, but the judgments in patient selection and operative management are paramount in determining its success.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(99)00422-7

Urology
Volume 54, Issue 6 , Pages 1088-1091, December 1999