Urology
Volume 79, Issue 2 , Pages 321-325, February 2012

Is Renal Biopsy a Better Predictor of the Outcome of Pyeloplasty in Adult Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction?

Institute of Nephro-urology, Victoria Hospital campus, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Received 29 March 2011; accepted 11 October 2011. published online 14 December 2011.

Objective

To prospectively evaluate per operative renal biopsy as a predictor of outcome of pyeloplasty in cases of unilateral pelviureteric junction obstruction in adults.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a prospective study on 24 patients with unilateral UPJ obstruction undergoing pyeloplasty between November 2005 and August 2006 and followed them until December 2010. Intraoperative renal wedge biopsy was obtained in these patients and this was correlated with preoperative DRF on diuretic renogram. Outcome of pyeloplasty was assessed at 1 and 3 years by diuretic renograms and the renal biopsy as a predictive tool was compared with preoperative DRF.

Results

Histology suggestive of obstructive damage to kidneys, such as significant glomerulosclerosis, widened Bowman's capsule, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy on renal biopsy was the highly significant predictor of poor outcome of pyeloplasty with a P value = .001 compared with preoperative DRF.

Conclusion

Renal biopsy is better predictor of outcome of pyeloplasty compared with preoperative DRF in UPJ obstruction. In the presence of severe obstructive changes in renal biopsy, recoverability of renal function despite achievement of successful drainage is significantly decreased.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(11)02496-4

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.018

Urology
Volume 79, Issue 2 , Pages 321-325, February 2012