Urology
Volume 77, Issue 2 , Pages 469-473 , February 2011

Bone-anchored Sling for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: Assessment of Complications

Received 1 March 2010 ,Accepted 9 June 2010.

References 

  1. Nitti JW . The prevalence of urinary incontinence . Rev Urol . 2001;3:S2–S6
  2. Ficazzola MA , Nitti VW . The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic finding . J Urol . 1998;160:1317–1320
  3. Stothers L , Thom DH , Calhoun E . Urologic diseases in America: Urinary Incontinence in Men . J Urol . 2005;173:1302–1308
  4. Jacoby SMK , Filberti C , Wald M , et al.   Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence . J Urol . 2001;165:72–76
  5. Comiter CV . The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study . J Urol . 2002;167:597–601
  6. Castle EP , Andrews PE , Itano N , et al.   The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: mean followup of 18 months . J Urol . 2005;173:1657–1660
  7. Gilberti C , Gallo F , Schenone M , et al.   The bone anchored suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup . J Urol . 2009;181:2204–2208
  8. Onur R , Singla A . Comparison of bone-anchored sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence . Int J Urol . 2006;13:1207–1211
  9. Comiter CV . The male perineal sling: intermediate-term results . Neurourol Urodyn . 2005;24:645–653
  10. Fischer MC , Huckabay C , Nitti VW . The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome . J Urol . 2007;177:1414–1418
  11. Rajpurkar AD , Onur R , Singla A . Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy of the new perineal Bone-anchored male sling . Eur Urol . 2005;47:237–242
  12. Fassi-Fehri H , Badet L , Cherass A , et al.   Efficacy of the InVance male sling in men with stress urinary incontinence . Eur Urol . 2007;51:498–503
  13. Guimaraes M , Oliveiro R , Pinto R , et al.   Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treatment of male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery . Br J Urol . 2008;103:500–504
  14. Giberti C , Gallo F , Schenone M , et al.   The bone-anchored sub-urethral sling for the treatment of iatrogenic male incontinence: subjective and objective assessment after 41 months of mean follow-up . World J Urol . 2008;26:173–178
  15. Mouracade P , Wagner B , Charles T , et al.   Treatment of postoperative male urinary incontinence by bone-anchored male sling . Prog Urol . 2008;18:390–394
  16. Twiss CO , Fischer MC , Nitti VW . Comparison between reduction in 24-hour pad weight, International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and post-operative patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) score in patients after male perineal sling . Neurourol Urodyn . 2007;26:8–13
  17. Ballert KN , Nitti VW . Complications of male incontinence surgery . Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep . 2008;3:58–62

PII: S0090-4295(10)00803-4

doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.014

Urology
Volume 77, Issue 2 , Pages 469-473 , February 2011

Article Tools