Urology
Volume 76, Issue 3 , Pages 620-623, September 2010

Active Surveillance for Larger (cT1bN0M0 and cT2N0M0) Renal Cortical Neoplasms

Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Received 26 February 2010; received in revised form 10 April 2010 published online 05 July 2010.

Objectives

To report our experience with patients undergoing active surveillance (AS) with Stage T1bN0M0 and T2N0M0 tumors. AS is a reasonable option for selected patients with renal cortical neoplasms (RCNs). Most patients undergoing AS are high-risk surgical candidates with Stage T1a lesions. The natural history of larger (Stage cT1bN0M0 and cT2N0M0) RCNs remains undefined.

Methods

Our institution's institutional review board-approved urologic oncology database was reviewed and identified 229 patients undergoing AS for RCNs. Of this cohort, 36 patients with 42 RCNs ≥4 cm were monitored at regular intervals with imaging. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. The patient demographics, presentation, comorbidity level (Charlson comorbidity index), tumor size, tumor growth rate, and survival data were recorded. A failure of AS was defined as a progression to metastasis or a change from AS to a delayed surgical intervention.

Results

The mean Charlson comorbidity index was 2.83, with 52.8% of patients having an index of ≥3, indicating a high surgical risk. The mean tumor size on the initial computed tomography scan was 7.13 cm (range 4-13.7), and the mean growth rate was 0.57 cm/y (range 0-5.9). With a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 6-96), 5 patients (13.8%) had failure. Three lesions were treated with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and found to be pT2N0M0 on final pathologic examination. Two patients (5.6%) in this cohort developed metastatic disease, and no cancer-specific deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Patients with Stage T1bN0M0 and T2N0M0 RCNs, monitored for a mean follow-up of 3 years, demonstrated a growth rate of 0.57 cm/y, with only 5.6% of patients progressing to metastatic disease.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(10)00580-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.021

Urology
Volume 76, Issue 3 , Pages 620-623, September 2010