Urology
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 265-270, August 2010

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Men, Women, and Children—Current Evidence: Findings of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence

  • Brian S. Buckley

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr. Brian S. Buckley, Ph.D., Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
  • ,
  • Marie Carmela M. Lapitan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital and National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
  • ,
  • epidemiology committee of the fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 2008

Received 20 October 2009; accepted 24 November 2009. published online 10 June 2010.

Objectives

To summarize existing evidence relating to the prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in order to provide a concise reference source for clinicians, health researchers, and service planners.

Methods

For the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence (4th ICI) world experts identified, collated, and reviewed the best available evidence. Estimates of prevalence from different studies are presented as ranges.

Results

Most studies report some degree of urinary incontinence (UI) in 25-45% of women; 7-37% of women aged 20-39 report some UI; “daily UI” is reported by 9% to 39% of women over 60. Pregnancy, childbirth, diabetes and increased body mass index are associated with an increased risk of UI. Prevalence of UI in men approximately half that in women: UI is seen in 11-34% of older men, with 2-11% reporting daily UI. Surgery for prostate disease is associated with an increased risk. Some 10% of children aged seven, 3% of 11-12 years olds and 1% of 16-17 year olds are not dry at night.

Conclusions

UI is clearly common, but accurate prevalence data have proven difficult to establish because of heterogeneity between studies in terms of methodologies, definitions of UI and populations considered. Future research should use standardized, validated and more readily comparable methods.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Milsom I, Herbison P, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U, Thom D comprised the Epidemiology Committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, 2008.

PII: S0090-4295(10)00019-1

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.078

Urology
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 265-270, August 2010