Urology
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 515.e1-515.e7, August 2010

Quantitative Loss of Heterozygosity Analysis for Urothelial Carcinoma Detection and Prognosis

  • Delphine Collin-Chavagnac

      Affiliations

    • Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
    • Laboratoire de Radiobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Oullins, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Delphine Collin-Chavagnac, Pharm.D., Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495 Pierre Bénite Cedex, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Christophe Marçais

      Affiliations

    • Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Stephane Billon

      Affiliations

    • Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Françoise Descotes

      Affiliations

    • Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Eric Piaton

      Affiliations

    • Centre de Pathologie Est, Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, Boulevard Pinel, Bron, France
  • ,
  • Myriam Decaussin

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Anatomopathologie Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, France
  • ,
  • Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse

      Affiliations

    • Service de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire Sud, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
    • Laboratoire de Radiobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Oullins, France
  • ,
  • Alain Ruffion

      Affiliations

    • Service d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud, Chemin du Grand Revoyet, Pierre Bénite, France

Received 7 May 2009; accepted 14 November 2009. published online 08 March 2010.

Objectives

To evaluate loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using microsatellite polymorphism analysis as a diagnostic and prognostic marker at the time of transurethral resection and as a follow-up marker preceding cystoscopic evidence of recurrence compared with cytology.

Methods

A total of 127 urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients were included. Tumors were staged and graded according to the International Union Against Cancer–tumor, node, metastases system and to the 2004 World Health Organization classification. LOH urinalysis was performed using 8 markers and marker-specific LOH thresholds. Thirty control samples, obtained from healthy volunteers, were used to determine the positive cut-off for each marker.

Results

LOH was significantly more sensitive than cytology in low-grade (64.8% vs 38.5%, P <.001) and low-stage UC (68.6% vs 45.5%, P <.001). The cumulative sensitivity of cytology and LOH reached 74.7% (P <.001) for low-grade and 80.2% (P <.001) for low-stage tumors. Both urinary LOH at TP53 and chromosome 9p markers were associated with an increased risk of recurrence (relative risk = 1.73 [1.30-2.31], P = .0002) and occurred more frequently in the initial urine samples of patients who later relapsed from primary tumors (36.4% vs 0.0%, P <.05 and 57.6% vs 15.8%, P = .0001). Among 32 relapse patients, LOH was positive alongside cystoscopy in 25 of 32 cases and tested positive before cystoscopy detected recurrence in a further 5 of 25 cases.

Conclusions

UC diagnosis and monitoring would greatly benefit from supplementing conventional cytology with LOH urinalysis, using a panel of 8 microsatellite markers with specific threshold levels. Given the limitations of both cystoscopy and cytology, novel molecular markers are needed for detection and follow-up of UC.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(09)02994-X

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.046

Urology
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 515.e1-515.e7, August 2010