Urology
Volume 75, Issue 6 , Pages 1269-1274, June 2010

Robot-assisted Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Bladder Cancer—Where Have We Reached By 2009

  • Iqbal Singh

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Iqbal Singh, M.D., M.Ch.(Urology), Department of Surgery (Urology), University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) and GTBH, F-14 South Extension Part-2, New Delhi-110049, India

Department of Urology, Wake Forest University Medical School and Baptist Medical Center, Medical Centre Boulevard, Winston Salem, North Carolina

Received 3 August 2009; accepted 6 November 2009. published online 28 January 2010.

Objectives

To review the current status and role of robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. To review the need, extent, lymph node yield, oncological feasibility, and outcome of robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive bladder cancer in patients undergoing a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Methods

The National Library of Medicine and the Pub Med were extensively searched for the cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy performed in conjunction with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer using the following keywords: bladder cancer, pelvic lymphadenectomy, cystectomy, laparoscopy, robot, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy. These were reviewed and analyzed (using certain tabulated parameters) to determine the current status of robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Results

The search yielded about 12 major published series (278 cases) of “robot-assisted radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy,” with an overall acceptable mean operating time(s), complication rate, blood loss, and hospital stay.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy is an oncologically feasible and technically safe procedure with acceptable early operative outcomes that appear to be comparable to those achieved with open/laparoscopic surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(09)02917-3

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.020

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 6 , Pages 1269-1274, June 2010