Urology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 321-327, February 2010

Gender-related Differences in Patients With Stage I to III Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

  • Giovanni Lughezzani

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Maxine Sun

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Paul Perrotte

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Shahrokh F. Shariat

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Claudio Jeldres

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Lars Budäus

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Mathieu Latour

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Hugues Widmer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Alain Duclos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Francois Bénard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Michael McCormack

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Francesco Montorsi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Pierre I. Karakiewicz

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Prognosis and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Department of Pathology, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Pierre I. Karakiewicz, M.D., F.R.C.S.C., Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center (CHUM), 1058, rue St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2X 3J4

Received 30 July 2009; accepted 25 September 2009. published online 04 December 2009.

Objectives

To examine the effect of gender in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) stage at nephroureterectomy (NU), as well as on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after NU in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I-III UTUC.

Methods

Our analyses relied on 2903 (59.9%) males and 1947 (40.1%) females who underwent an NU for pT1-3N0/xM0 UTUC between 1988 and 2006, within 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models examined the effect of gender on stage and grade distribution at NU. Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots explored the impact of gender on CSM rates, after accounting for other-cause mortality (OCM). Finally, competing-risks regression models tested the independent predictor status of gender in CSM analyses. Covariates consisted of pT stage, pN stage, tumor grade, primary tumor location, type and year of surgery, age, and race.

Results

Relative to males, females had a higher proportion of pT3 UTUC (43.1% vs 39%; P = .02) and a higher proportion of grade III/IV UTUC (63.8% vs 59.8%; P = .04) at NU. The female gender represented an independent predictor of pT3 UTUC at NU (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.15; P = .03). After accounting for OCM, CSM rates in females were higher than those in males (HR: 1.18; P = .03). However, in multivariable competing-risks regression models, no statistically significant differences in survival were recorded between males and females (HR: 1.07; P = .4).

Conclusions

Females are more likely to have more advanced pathologic T stage and higher tumor grade at NU than males. After accounting for OCM, stage, grade, and noncancer characteristics, gender no longer affects CSM.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Pierre I. Karakiewicz has been partially supported by the University of Montréal Urology Associates, Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec, the University of Montréal, Department of Surgery and the University of Montréal Foundation.

 Giovanni Lughezzani and Maxine Sun have contributed equally for the preparation of this manuscript.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02638-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.048

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 321-327, February 2010