Urology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 399-405, February 2010

The Unintended Burden of Increased Prostate Cancer Detection Associated With Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

  • Peter C. Albertsen

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Peter C. Albertsen, M.D., Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3955

Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut

Received 10 March 2009; accepted 6 August 2009. published online 23 November 2009.

The increasing incidence of prostate cancer is associated with the intensity of screening for prostate-specific antigen. Although some men may benefit from the early detection of prostate cancer through screening, all men diagnosed with prostate cancer experience an effect on their mental and physical well-being and that of their families. In light of the recent publication of the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations concerning prostate-specific antigen testing, this article reviews the quality-of-life implications of prostate cancer screening and diagnosis, and explores risk reduction in screened men as a potential strategy to manage these issues.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Responsibility for opinions, conclusions, and interpretation of data lies with the author.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02610-7

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.078

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 2 , Pages 399-405, February 2010