Urology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 83-86, January 2010

The Effect of Prior Varicocelectomy in Patients With Nonobstructive Azoospermia on Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: A Retrospective Pilot Study

  • Bulent Haydardedeoglu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bulent Haydardedeoglu, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Cemalpasa Mah 5 Sokak Ferah Apt Kat 9 no 18 Seyhan, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Tahsin Turunc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Esra Bulgan Kilicdag

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Umit Gul

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
  • ,
  • Tayfun Bagis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey

Received 5 June 2009; accepted 9 September 2009. published online 13 November 2009.

Objectives

To examine our retrospective data on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and to determine whether a history of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing an ICSI cycle was optimizing or not.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on Baskent University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, and Department of Urology. Infertile couples suffering from NOA scheduled to an ICSI cycle, which was controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with a gonadotropin or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol, selected for the study were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 31) included NOA patients who had undergone prior varicocele repair, and group 2 (n = 65) included NOA patients who had not undergone varicocele repair.

Results

There was a significant difference between the 2 groups considering the sperm retrieval rate, which was higher in the varicocele repair group (sperm retrieval rate 60.81% and 38.46% respectively, P = .01). The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were significantly higher in the varicocelectomy group (74.2% vs 52.3% and 64.5% vs 41.5%, respectively, P <.05).

Conclusions

Varicocele repair in NOA might be considered in patients undergoing ICSI cycle.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(09)02561-8

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.023

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 83-86, January 2010