Urology
Volume 75, Issue 5 , Pages 1156-1161, May 2010

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome of Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Treated With Tamsulosin HCl in Korea

  • Hyuk Soo Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • ,
  • Choal Hee Park

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Choal Hee Park, M.D., 194 Dongsan-dong, Jung-gu, Dongsan Hospital, Department of Urology, Daegu, Korea
  • ,
  • Dae Kyung Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
  • ,
  • Jong Kwan Park

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
  • ,
  • Sung Joon Hong

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Byung Ha Chung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Jeong Gu Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Choung-Soo Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
  • ,
  • Kyu-Sung Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Joon Chul Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Received 23 July 2009; accepted 5 September 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily in treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using the new subjective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) outcome score (LOS).

Methods

Of 370 patients from 9 urology outpatient clinics, 299 finished this study. Tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily was administered orally in a nonblind design for a 12-week period. The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin with new assessing parameters; the most bothersome symptoms, BPH K1-short form and LOS. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin with conventional parameters, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax.), and postvoiding residual urine volume.

Results

A total of 189 (63.2%) of 299 patients responded that their most bothersome symptom had been improved at 12 weeks after study. All 9 items in BPH K1-short form showed statistically significant improvement (P <.05). Overall, 20 (6.7%) patients met criteria for cured, 246 (82.3%) for improved, and 33 (11.0%) for failed. Statistically significant improvements were observed in IPSS, Qmax., and postvoiding residual urine volume (P <.05).

Conclusions

Tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily may be an effective treatment, subjectively and objectively in patients with BPH. To evaluate the effect of the treatment in patients with BPH, it may be more effective to use the subjective quality of life questionnaire and the subjective-objective data integrated LOS than the currently used IPSS and Qmax..

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by a grant from Astellas Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

PII: S0090-4295(09)02532-1

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.010

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 5 , Pages 1156-1161, May 2010