Urology
Volume 75, Issue 4 , Pages 779-785, April 2010

Polymorphisms in hOGG1 and XRCC1 and Risk of Prostate Cancer: Effects Modified by Plasma Antioxidants

  • Jianjun Zhang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jianjun Zhang, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Public Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, 714 N Senate Ave, Suite EF250, Indianapolis, IN 46202
  • ,
  • Ishwori B. Dhakal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
  • ,
  • Graham Greene

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
  • ,
  • Nicholas P. Lang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
  • ,
  • Fred F. Kadlubar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas

Received 11 March 2009; accepted 26 August 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Objectives

To investigate whether polymorphisms in genes involved in the repair of oxidative DNA damage, modulate, and/or interact with antioxidants to influence prostate cancer risk in a population-based case-control study in Central Arkansas. Accumulating evidence indicates that oxidative stress plays a role in prostate carcinogenesis.

Methods

Cases (n = 193) included men aged 40-80 years, diagnosed with prostate cancer in 3 major hospitals in 1998-2003, and controls (n = 197) were matched to cases by age, race, and county of residence.

Results

After adjustment for confounders, subjects who were heterozygous or homozygous for the variant allele of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism appeared to experience a lower risk of prostate cancer than those who were homozygous for the wild-type allele (odds ratio [OR] (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.72 (0.46-1.10)]. Conversely, a significant increased risk was observed for individuals who carried 1 or 2 copies of the variant allele of the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism, compared with those who only harbored the wild-type allele (OR [95% CI]: 1.56 [1.01-2.45]). The above-mentioned associations were generally more pronounced among subjects with low plasma carotenoids or α-tocopherol (<median). Among subjects who had low plasma levels of β-cryptoxanthin (<73 μg/L), possession of at least 1 copy of the XRCC1 399Gln allele conferred a greater than 2-fold elevated risk (OR [95% CI]: 2.64 [1.40-5.07]).

Conclusions

Our study offers preliminary but intriguing data suggesting that variability in the capacity of repairing oxidative DNA damage influences susceptibility to prostate cancer and that these effects are modified by antioxidants.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study is supported by grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Arkansas Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (116-1005406, Dr. Zhang, PI) and from the National Institute on Aging, NIH (1R01AG15722, Dr. Lang, PI).

PII: S0090-4295(09)02505-9

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.063

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 4 , Pages 779-785, April 2010